Abstract
In this chapter we describe a technique that is used to refine a separable metrizable topology so as to produce a locally countable and locally compact new topology with various interesting pathologies. The main feature of the technique is that of arranging for some carefully selected sequences that have uncountably many common limit points in the old topology, to also have uncountably many common limit points relative to the new topology. This ensures that the new topology inherits some of the good properties of the old one.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
To be pedantic, \(\mathcal {S}\) consists of all sequences (S, Q ∖ S, Q ∖ S, …) satisfying S ⊂ Q and \(| \mathop {\mathrm {cl}} \nolimits _\sigma (S) \cap \mathop {\mathrm {cl}} \nolimits _\sigma (Q \setminus S)|= \mathfrak {c}\).
References
S. Broverman, Another realcompact 0–dimensional non–N–compact space. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 69, 156–158 (1978)
M.G. Charalambous, An example concerning inverse limit sequences of normal spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 78, 605–607 (1980)
M.G. Charalambous, The dimension of inverse limit and N–compact spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 78, 648–652 (1982)
M.G. Charalambous, A normal space Z with \(\mathop {\mathrm {ind}}\nolimits Z = 1\) no compactification of which has transfinite dimension. Topology Proc. 22, 95–101 (1997)
E.K. van Douwen, A technique for constructing honest locally compact submetrizable examples. Topol. Appl. 47, 179–201 (1992)
I. Juhász, K. Kunen, M.E. Rudin, Two more hereditarily separable non–Lindelöf spaces. Canad. J. Math. 28, 998–1005 (1976)
S. Mrówka, N–Compactness, Metrizability and Covering Dimension, Rings of continuous functions (Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 1995), pp. 247–275
A. Mysior, Two easy examples of zero–dimensional spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 92, 615–617 (1984)
P. Nyikos, Prabir Roy’s example is not N–compact. General Topology Appl. 3, 197–210 (1973)
A. Ostaszewski, On countably compact perfectly normal spaces. J. London Math. Soc. 14, 505–516 (1976)
E. Pol, A remark about the Juhász–Kunen–Rudin construction of a hereditarily separable non–Lindelöf space. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Ser. Sci. Math. Astr. Phys. 24, 749–751 (1976)
P. Roy, Failure of equivalence of dimension concepts for metric spaces. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 68, 609–613 (1962)
R.C. Solomon, A scattered space that is not zero–dimensional. Bull. London Math. Soc. 8, 239–240 (1976)
K. Tsuda, Some examples concerning the dimension of products. Math. Japonica 27, 177–195 (1982)
M. Wage, The dimension of product spaces. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 75, 4671–4672 (1978)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Charalambous, M.G. (2019). The van Douwen Technique for Constructing Counterexamples. In: Dimension Theory. Atlantis Studies in Mathematics, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22232-1_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22232-1_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22231-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22232-1
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)