An Empirical Study on the Influential Factors of User Loyalty in Digital Fitness Community

  • Yao ShenEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11582)


Nowadays, consumption of self-healthy and figure management is developing rapidly. Scholars have studied the impact factors of long-term use of wearable fitness devices. However, a holistic loyalty impact analysis of the applications they are associated with is rarely seen. Based on the individual cognitive model of perception-emotion-intention, seven hypotheses are proposed to verify the relationships among transaction cost, motivation, usability, trust and loyalty. The results show that transaction costs have significant adverse effects on loyalty. Trust has significant positive effect on loyalty, partial mediating effect in transaction costs, and complete mediating effect in motivation and usability on loyalty.


Fitness APPs Self-healthy management Loyalty 


  1. 1.
    Zhang, H., Liu, X.: Investigation and research on fitness guidance APP resources and usage behavior. J. Wuhan Inst. Phys. Educ. 51(10), 37–42 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu, L., Zhang, N.: Research on the relationship between customer perceived value, satisfaction and loyalty-empirical analysis in e-commerce environment. J. Inf. Resour. Manag. 6(03), 50–57+106 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deng, A., Tao, B., Ma, Y.: An empirical study on the factors affecting customer loyalty in online shopping. Chin. Manag. Sci. 22(06), 94–102 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cha, J.: Research on the relationship between B2C e-commerce customer value and customer loyalty. Zhejiang University (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sallis, J.F., et al.: The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Prev. Med. 16(6), 825–836 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rupp, M.A., et al.: The role of individual differences on perceptions of wearable fitness device trust, usability, and motivational impact. Appl. Ergon. 70, 77–87 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ba, S., Wang, L.: Digital health communities: the effect of their motivation mechanisms. Decis. Support Syst. 55(4), 941–947 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koo, D.-M., Ju, S.-H.: The interactional effects of atmospherics and perceptual curiosity on emotions and online shopping intention. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(3), 377–388 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murray, K.B., Haubl, G.: A human capital perspective of skill acquisition and interface loyalty. Commun. ACM 46(12), 272–278 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee, D., et al.: Antecedents and consequences of mobile phone usability: linking simplicity and interactivity to satisfaction, trust, and brand loyalty. Inf. Manag. 52(3), 295–304 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bevan, N.: International standards for HCI and usability. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 55(4), 533–552 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stragier, J., Vanden Abeele, M., De Marez, L.: Recreational athletes running motivations as predictors of their use of online fitness community features. Behav. Inf. Technol. 37(8), 815–827 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park, J., Gunn, F., Han, S.-L.: Multidimensional trust building in e-retailing: cross-cultural differences in trust formation and implications for perceived risk. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 19(3), 304–312 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bhawuk, D.P.S., Brislin, R.: The measurement of intercultural sensitivity using the concepts of individualism and collectivism. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 16(4), 413–436 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yamagishi, T., Yamagishi, M.: Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motiv. Emot. 18(2), 129–166 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Keaveney, S.M., Parthasarathy, M.: Customer switching behavior in online services: an exploratory study of the role of selected attitudinal, behavioral, and demographic factors. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 29(4), 374–390 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheung, M., et al.: Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: informational and normative determinants of on-line consumer recommendations. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 13(4), 9–38 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zeithaml, V.A.: J. Marketing 2 (1988)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of DesignShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations