Skip to main content

Background Considerations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Substance in Aristotle's Metaphysics Zeta
  • 162 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 2 sets out notions that will be useful in trying to understand Zeta—including Aristotle’s uses of ‘substance’ (ousia), his notion of essence, ways in which something can be primary, kath’ hauto and kata sumbebēkos predication, and what is katholou (universal). It also briefly describes Aristotelian dialectic and the employment it might have in Zeta.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See also Meta Δ.8 1017b21–23, where Aristotle says that a thing’s essence is its substance.

  2. 2.

    According to Burnyeat (2001, 40), ‘primary’ is always said in relation to a definite series.

  3. 3.

    Kath’ hauto predication will receive further discussion in section ‘IV. Kath’ Hauto and Kata Sumbebēkos Predication’.

  4. 4.

    Code (1985, 111–113) and Furth (1988, 234–235) understand the essence of an individual substance in this way.

  5. 5.

    This point receives further discussion in Chap. 8.

  6. 6.

    In Post Analytics I.2 and I.10, Aristotle says that definitions that are formulae of the essences of objects that fall within the subject matter of a science are among the first principles from which demonstrations in that science proceed (72a19 –23, 76b3–10, and 12–15). These include demonstrations of properties idion to things whose definitions are first principles of that science. This makes what is predicated of these things kath’ hauto explanatorily prior to what is idion to them.

  7. 7.

    See also Meta Δ.30 1025a14–15.

  8. 8.

    I owe this point to Sandra Peterson.

  9. 9.

    This way of understanding Z.13 1038b34–1039a1 will receive further discussion in Chaps. 14, 15, and 16.

  10. 10.

    What follows owes a debt to Owen (1961). For other discussions of what this method amounts to and the extent to which Aristotle uses it, see Bolton (1987, 1991, 1994, 1996), Irwin (1988, Chaps. 1, 2, and 3), and Nussbaum (1982).

  11. 11.

    Recently, there has been a rising interest in developing a neo-Aristotelian metaphysics. For some examples, see Koslicki (2013). Although my interest in Z is primarily historical, what I say in connection with it may be of some interest to those involved in this project.

References

  • Barnes, Jonathan (1984), The Complete Works of Aristotle, Revised Oxford Translation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, Robert (1987), “Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals,” in Gotthelf, Alan and Lennox, James G. (1987) editors, Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 120–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, Robert (1991), “Aristotle’s Method in Natural Science, Physics I,” in Judson, Lindsay (1991) editor, Aristotle’s ‘Physics’, A Collection of Essays (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, Robert (1994), “Aristotle’s Conception of Metaphysics as a Science,” in Scaltsas T., Charles, D., and Gill, M. L. (1994) editors, Unity, Identity and Explanation in Aristotle’s ‘Metaphysics’ (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 321–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, Robert (1996), “Science and the Science of Substance in Aristotle’s Metaphysics,” in Lewis, Frank A. and Bolton, Robert (1996) editors, Form, Matter, and Mixture in Aristotle (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers), 231–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnyeat, Myles (2001), A Map of ‘Metaphysics’ Zeta (Pittsburgh: Mathesis Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Code, Alan (1985), “On the Origins of Some Aristotelian Theses About Predication,” in Bogen, James and Maguire, James E. (1985) editors, How Things Are (Dordrecht: D. Reidel), 101–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furth, Montgomery (1988), Form and Psyche, An Aristotelian Approach to Metaphysics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, T. H. (1988), Aristotle’s First Principles (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koslicki, Kathrin (2013), “Substance, Independence, and Unity,” in Feser, Edward (2013) editor, Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 169–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha (1982), “Saving Aristotle’s Appearances,” in Schofield, Malcolm and Nussbaum, Martha (1982) editors, Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G. E. L. Owen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 267–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G. E. L. (1961), “Tithenai ta phainomena,” Aristote et les problemes de method, Edited by Mansion, S. Papers of the Second Symposium Aristotelicum (Lousvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain), 83–103. Reprinted in Owen, G. E. L. (1986), Logic, Science and Dialectic, Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy, editor, Nussbaum, Martha (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norman O. Dahl .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dahl, N.O. (2019). Background Considerations. In: Substance in Aristotle's Metaphysics Zeta. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22161-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics