Advertisement

Fitness Doping pp 183-197 | Cite as

Trajectories and the New Doping Demography

  • Jesper AndreassonEmail author
  • Thomas Johansson
Chapter
  • 146 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter, we pull together some of the key themes and conclusions of the book, focusing on future developments of fitness doping and disrupted doping trajectories in the context of gym and fitness culture. The chapter also picks up some of the book’s other principal themes: its theoretical contribution to the debate on doping trajectories as well as gender and health, among other things.

References

  1. Bhaba, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Brennan, R., Wells, J., & van Hout, M. C. (2017). The injecting use of image and performance-enhancing drugs (IPED) in the general population: A systematic review. Health and Social Care in the Community, 25(5), 1459–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christiansen, A. V. (2018). Motionsdoping. Styrketræning, identitet og kultur [Recreational doping: Strength training, identity and culture]. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  4. Christiansen, A. V., Schmidt Vinther, A., & Liokaftos, D. (2016). Outline of a typology of men’s use of anabolic androgenic steroids in fitness and strength training environments. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy,  https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2016.1231173.Google Scholar
  5. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conrad, P. (2007). The medicalization of society: On the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Johansson, T., & Ottemo, A. (2015). Ruptures in hegemonic masculinity: The dialectic between ideology and utopia. Journal of Gender Studies, 24(2), 192–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klein, A. (1993). Little big men: Bodybuilding, subculture and gender construction. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  10. McNamee, M., Backhouse, S. H., Defoort, Y., Parkinson, A., Sauer, M., & Collins, C. (2014). Study on doping prevention: A map of legal, regulatory and prevention practice provisions in EU 28. Luxembourg. Retrieved from http://www.studyondopingprevention.eu/.
  11. McVeigh, J., Bates, G., & Chandler, M. (2015). Steroids and image enhancing drugs—2014 survey results. Retrieved from http://www.ipedinfo.co.uk/resources/downloads/SIEDs%20Survey%20report%202014%20FINAL.pdf.
  12. Monaghan, L. F. (2001). Bodybuilding, drugs and risk: Health, risk and society. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Monaghan, L. F. (2012). Accounting for illicit steroid use: Bodybuilders’ justifications. In A. Locks & N. Richardson (Red.), Critical readings in bodybuilding. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Pope, H. G., Phillips, K. A., & Olivardia, R. (2002). The adonis complex: How to identify, treat, and prevent body obsession in men and boys. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  15. Smith Maguire, J. (2008). Fit for consumption: Sociology and the business of fitness. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Thualagant, N. (2012). The conceptualization of fitness doping and its limitations. Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics, 15(3), 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. van de Ven, K., & Mulrooney, K. (2016). How private gyms work to keep their members from doping. The Conversation. Retrieved January 5, 2019, from https://www.businessinsider.com/private-gyms-members-doping-2016-12?r=US&IR=T&IR=T.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sport ScienceLinnaeus UniversityKalmarSweden
  2. 2.Department of Education, Communication and LearningUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations