Abstract
Women’s muscle-building has long been considered a threat to the ‘natural’ gender order. This applies particularly to women’s gender boundary-crossing into the realm of muscular masculinity, through drug use practices and bodybuilding. On the basis of qualitatively gathered interview material and data from various postings on a pro-doping online community, in this chapter we describe and analyze how female fitness dopers understand and negotiate their use in relation to gender and the body. The chapter is positioned within post-structural feminism, and the results show that there is an increasing amount of knowledge in the area of fitness doping that not only targets women, but has also been developed by and for women concerning. Traditionally, scholars have connected female drug use more or less exclusively to female bodybuilders, but as new body and femininity ideals develop, the demographics of female fitness doping are broadening. Although fitness doping remains primarily a masculine domain, the results reveal a development in which women are increasingly being invited to join and becoming more integrated into a fitness community of drug users.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andreasson, J. (2015). Reconceptualising the gender of fitness doping: Reconceptualising the gender of fitness doping—Performing and negotiating masculinity through drug-use practices. Social Sciences, 4, 546–562.
Andreasson, J., & Johansson, T. (2014). The global gym: Gender, health and pedagogies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Aoki, D. (1996). Sex and muscle: The female bodybuilder meets Lacan. Body & Society, 4, 59–74.
Baker, J. S., Graham, M. R., & Davies, B. (2006). Steroid and prescription medicine abuse in the health and fitness community: A regional study. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 17(7), 479–484.
Boepple, L., Ata, R. N., Rum, R., & Thompson, K. (2016). Strong is the new skinny: A content analysis of fitspiration websites. Body Image, 17, 132–135.
Bolin, A., & Granskog, J. (2003). Athletic intruders: Ethnographic research on women, culture, and exercise. New York, NY: State University of New York.
Boyle, L. (2005). Flexing the tensions of female muscularity: How female bodybuilders negotiate normative femininity in competitive bodybuilding. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 33(1–2), 134–149.
Breivik, G., Hanstad, D. V., & Loland, S. (2009). Attitudes towards the use of performance-enhancing substances and body modification techniques: A comparison between elite athletes and the general population. Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics, 12(6), 737–754.
Bunsell, T. (2013). Strong and hard women: An ethnography of female bodybuilding. London: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. London: Routledge.
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.
Christiansen, A. V. (2018). Motionsdoping: Styrketræning, identitet og kultur [Recreational doping: Strength training, identity and culture]. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Denham, B. E. (2008). Masculinities in hardcore bodybuilding. Men and Masculinities, 11(2), 234–242.
Evans-Brown, M., & McVeigh, J. (2009). Anabolic steroid use in the general population of the United Kingdom. In V. Møller, M. McNamee, & P. Dimeo (Eds.), Elite sport, doping and public health (pp. 75–97). Odense, Denmark: University Press of Southern Denmark.
Fair, J. D. (1999). Muscletown USA: Bob Hoffman and the manly culture of York Barbell. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Field, A., Austin, S., Camargo, C., Taylor, C. B., Striegel-Moore, R. H., Loud, K. J. & Colditz, G. A. (2005). Exposure to the mass media, body shape concerns, and use of supplements to improve weight and shape among male and female adolescents. Pediatrics, 116(2), 214–220.
Griffet, J. (2000). The path chosen by female bodybuilders: A tentative interpretation. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17, 130–150.
Grogan, S. (2006). Body image and health: Contemporary perspectives. Journal of Health Psychology, 11(4), 523–530.
Grogan, S., Evans, R., Wright, S., & Hunter, G. (2004). Femininity and muscularity: Accounts of seven women body builders. Journal of Gender Studies, 13(1), 49–61.
Haraway, D. (1990). A Manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology and socialist feminism in the 1980’s. In L. J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism. London: Routledge.
Hill Collins, P. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
IFBB. (2018). Our disciplines. Retrieved March 10, 2018, from https://ifbb.com/our-disciplines/.
Jespersen, M. R. (2012). “Definitely not for women”: An online community’s reflections on women’s use of performance enhancing drugs. In J. Tolleneer, S. Sterckz, & P. Bonte (Eds.), Athletic enhancement, human nature and ethics: Threats and opportunities of doping technologies (pp. 201–218). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Klein, A. (1993). Little big men: Bodybuilding, subculture and gender construction. New York: State University of New York Press.
Lindsay, C. (1996). Bodybuilding: A postmodern freak show. In R. G. Thomson (Ed.), Freakery: Cultural spectacles of the extraordinary body. New York: New York University Press.
Liokaftos, D. (2018). Natural bodybuilding: An account of its emergence and development as competition sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sports (Online), 1–18.
Malcolm, N. L. (2000). Constructing female athleticism: A study of girls’ recreational softball. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(10), 1304–1387.
McGrath, S., & Chananie-Hill, R. (2009). ‘Big Freaky-Looking Women’: Normalizing gender transgression through bodybuilding. Sociology of Sport Journal, 26, 235–254.
Monaghan, L. (2001). Bodybuilding, drugs and risk: Health, risk and society. New York: Routledge.
Monaghan, L. F. (2012). Accounting for illicit steroid use: Bodybuilders’ justifications. In A. Locks & N. Richardson (Eds.), Critical readings in bodybuilding (pp. 73–90). New York, NY: Routledge.
Muller, S., Gorrow, T. R., & Schneider, S. R. (2009). Enhancing appearance and sports performance: Are female collegiate athletes behaving more like males? Journal of American College Health, 57(5), 513–520.
Richardson, N. (2008). Flex-rated! Female bodybuilding: Feminist resistance or erotic spectacle? Journal of Gender Studies, 17(4), 289–301.
Roussel, P., Monaghan, L., Javerlhiac, S., & Yondre, F. (2010). The metamorphosis of female bodybuilders: Judging a paroxysmal body? International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 45(1), 103–109.
Sagoe, D., Andreassen, C. S., & Pallesen, S. (2014). The aetiology and trajectory of anabolic-androgenic steroid use initiation: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 9, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597x-9-27.
Sassatelli, R. (2010). Fitness culture: Gyms and the commercialisation of discipline and fun. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Smith, A. C. T., & Stewart, B. (2012). Body perceptions and health behaviors in an online bodybuilding community. Qualitative Health Research, 22(7), 971–985.
The Swedish Doping Act. (1991:1969). Dopningslagen. Stockholm, Sweden: Svensk författningssamling SFS.
Thualagant, N. (2012). The conceptualization of fitness doping and its limitations. Sport in society: Cultures, commerce, media, politics, 15(3), 409–419.
Van Hout, M. C., & Hearne, E. (2016). Netnography of female use of the synthetic growth hormone CJC-1295: Pulses and potions. Substance Use and Misuse, 51(1), 73–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andreasson, J., Johansson, T. (2020). Female Fitness Doping. In: Fitness Doping. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22105-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22105-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22104-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22105-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)