Fitness Doping pp 199-211 | Cite as

Research Design and Methodological Considerations

  • Jesper AndreassonEmail author
  • Thomas Johansson


In this chapter, we will present an outline of the methods and methodology used in the studies on which this book is based. The chapter includes, among other things, a discussion of our ethnographic approaches, sampling, interview and observational data, usage and sampling of narratives published on the Internet, and some ethical considerations.


  1. Agar, M. (1996). Professional stranger: Informal Introduction to ethnography. London: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson-Levitt, K. (2006). Ethnography. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 279–296). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Andreasson, J., & Johansson, T. (2014). The global gym: Gender, health and pedagogies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Andreasson, J., & Johansson, T. (2019). Extreme sports, extreme bodies: Gender, identities and bodies in motion. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Back, L. (2007). The art of listening. Oxford and New York: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Back, L. (2012a). Live sociology: Social research and its futures. The Sociological Review, 60(1), 18–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Back, L. (2012b). Tape recorder. In C. Lury & N. Wakeford (Eds.), Inventive methods: The happening of the social. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fangen, K. (2005). Deltagande observation [Participant observation]. Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar
  10. Fleischmann, A. (2004). Narratives published on the Internet by parents of children with autism: What do they reveal and why is it important? Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19(1), 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Giddens, A. (1986). The constitution of society. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gratton, C., & Jones, I. (2004). Research methods for sport studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Grodzinsky, F., & Tavani, H. (2010). Applying the ‘contextual integrity’ model of privacy to personal blogs in the blogosphere. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 3(1), 38–47.Google Scholar
  15. Hall, S., & Jefferson, T. (Eds.). (1976). Resistance through rituals. London, UK: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  16. Hallqvist, A., & Hydén, L.-C. (2012). Work transition as told: A narrative approach to biographical learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Hine, C. M. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hooley, T., Marriott, J., & Wellens, J. (2012). What is online research? New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  20. Hsiung, R. C. (2000). The best of both worlds: An online self-help group hosted by a mental health professional. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 3(6), 935–950.Google Scholar
  21. Joinson, A., McKenna, K., & Postmes, T. (2007). Oxford handbook of Internet psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kozinets, R. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Lalander, P. (2003). Hooked on heroin: Drugs and drifters in a globalized world. Oxford and New York: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Merill, B., & West, L. (2009). Using biographical methods in social research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Orgad, S. (2006). The cultural dimension of online communication: A study of breast cancer patients’ Internet spaces. New Media & Society, 8(2), 877–899.Google Scholar
  26. Pink, S. (2009). Doing sensory ethnography. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Porter, D. (1997). Internet culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Rosenberg, A. (2010). Virtual world research ethics and the private/public distinction. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 3(1), 23–37.Google Scholar
  29. Salganik, M., & Heckathorn, D. (2004). Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-drive sampling. Sociological Methodology, 34, 193–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shamir, B., Daya-Horesh, H., & Adler, D. (2005). Leading by biography: Towards a life-story approach to the study of leadership. Leadership, 1(1), 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sheehan, K. B. (2010). Online research methodology: Reflections and speculations. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 3(1), 56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender: Becoming respectable. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Sparkes, A. C., & Smith, B. (2007). Narrative constructionist inquiry. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 295–314). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  34. Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Walther, J. (2002). Research ethics in Internet-enabled research: Human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sport ScienceLinnaeus UniversityKalmarSweden
  2. 2.Department of Education, Communication and LearningUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations