Skip to main content

Towards a Dynamic Theory of How Hospitals Cope in Times of High Demand

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter builds on the research on delayed hospital discharge modelling work described in Chap. 7. It proposes a general, dynamic, hypothesis that the ‘normal’ mode of operation for many hospitals today is often well beyond their safe design capacity. This can be very risky for patients as well as expensive. A range of informal strategies which hospitals adopt to help cope with high demand are set out, together with their unintended consequences. These strategies and their unintended consequences are described in terms of the feedback loops and system archetypes introduced in Chap. 5. It is postulated that the unintended consequences for patients, staff and productivity result in an underachievement of the planned number and quality of hospital interventions. Moreover, the costs of using such coping strategies for lengthy periods could be much greater than the investment needed to avoid their use in the first place.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Extracts from the original paper are published with the permission of Wiley.

  2. 2.

    Summary of the rules for drawing feedback loops:

    1. Balancing (B) (or negative) feedback loops are target seeking control loops and have just one or an odd number of negative links between variables.

    2. Reinforcing (R) (or positive) feedback loops are growth loops and have all or an even number of negative links between variables.

    3. Positive links are when an increase in a tail variable of a link gives rise causally to an increase in the head variable (and vice versa).

    4. Negative links are when an increase in the tail variable of a link gives rise causally to a decrease in the head variable (and vice versa).

References

  • Adam. (2018). Moving on from spot purchasing in domiciliary care commissioning. http://www.useadam.co.uk/news/moving-on-from-spot-purchasing-in-domiciliary-care-commissioning/.

  • BBC. (2018). Hospitals buying private nursing home beds for delayed discharge patients. BBC Documentary on Nottingham University Hospital March 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buie, V. C., Owings, M. F., DeFrances, C. J., & Golosinskiy, A. (2006). National hospital discharge survey: Summary. Vital and Health Statistics. Series 13, 2010 (168).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (2018). GPs offered cash to refer fewer people to hospital. Health Policy Guardian Wed 28 February 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudman, J. (2019). We’ve been wasting years trying to design Brexit, interview with Mara Airoldi, Director of UK Government Outcome Lab, Guardian 16th January 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewbank, L., Thompson, J., & Mckenna, H. (2017). NHS bed numbers: Past, present, future. London: The Kings Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. (1968). Market growth as influenced by capital investment. Industrial Management Review, IX(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gainsbury, S. (2017). The NHS deficit is here to stay Nuffield Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healthwatch News Report. (2017). NHS needs to do more to understand why people are returning to hospital after discharge.

    Google Scholar 

  • NICE Guideline. (2016, December). Transition between inpatient hospital settings and community or care home settings for adults with social care needs. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, O. K., Makam, A. N., & Clark, C. (2017). Vital signs are still vital: Instability on discharge and the risk of post-discharge adverse outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 32, 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3826-8.

  • Oliva, R. (2001). Tradeoffs in responses to work pressure in the service industry. California Management Review, 43(4), 26–43. Reprinted in (2002) IEEE Engineering Management Review, 30(1), 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliva, R., & Sterman, J. D. (2001). Cutting corners and working overtime: Quality erosion in the service industry. Management Science, 47(7), 894–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxtoby, K. (2016). Preventing unsafe discharge from hospital. Nursing Times, 112, 25, 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust. (2018). Adult outlier policy, version 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repenning, P. N. (2001). Understanding fire fighting in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(5), 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repenning, N., Goncalves, P., & Black, L. (2001). Past the tipping point: The persistence of fire fighting in product development. California Management Review, 43(4), 44–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repenning, N., & Sterman, J. (2001). Nobody ever gets credit for fixing defects that didn’t happen: Creating and sustaining process improvement. California Management Review, 43(4), 64–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santamaria, J. D., Tobin, A. E., Anstey, M. H., Smith, R. J., & Reid, D. A. (2014). Do outlier inpatients experience more emergency calls in hospital? An observational cohort study. Medical Journal of Australia, 200(1), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja12.11680.

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. O., & Jackson, S. (2017). It’s not all about reducing length of stay. Carlike.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, C. (2016, October 15). NHS hospitals open own care homes to tackle beds crisis. Times Newspaper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J., Repenning, N., & Kofman, F. (1997). Unanticipated side effects of successful quality programs: Exploring a paradox of organizational improvement. Management Science, 43(4), 503–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stylianou, N., Fackrell, R., & Vasilakis, C. (2017). Are medical outliers associated with worse patient outcomes? A retrospective study within a regional NHS hospital using routine data. BMJ Open, 7, e015676. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triggle, N. (2016). Care homes could solve NHS bed-blocking. BBC Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme, E. F. (2003). Towards the definition and use of a core set of archetypal structures in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 19(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme, E. F. (2004). Using generic system archetypes to support thinking and learning. System Dynamics Review, 20(2), 341–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme, E. F., Arnold, S., Monk, D., Todd, D., & McKelvie, D. (2005). Coping but not coping in health and social care—masking the reality of running organisations well beyond safe design capacity. Systems Dynamics Review, 23(4), 371–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Wolstenholme .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wolstenholme, E., McKelvie, D. (2019). Towards a Dynamic Theory of How Hospitals Cope in Times of High Demand. In: The Dynamics of Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21878-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21878-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21877-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21878-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics