Advertisement

An Experience Making Use of Learning Analytics Techniques in Discussion Forums to Improve the Interaction in Learning Ecosystems

  • Luis Magdiel Oliva CórdovaEmail author
  • Héctor R. Amado-SalvatierraEmail author
  • Klinge Orlando Villalba CondoriEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11590)

Abstract

The study discussed in this paper had two principal objectives. The first objective was to stimulate engagement of participants in a virtual learning environment through the invitation to write an application essay on their motivation to be part of the learning experience. This first experience presented a positive reaction in terms of participation in a Massive Open Online Course (MOOCs). The second objective within a subset of the participants in the study was to evaluate the importance of using visual learning analytics to improve and enhance interaction in learning ecosystems, where the participant plays a main role and a visual aid could provide to the teachers different mental models and early alerts related to change of patterns or really low participation. For this, the work presents an analysis of the interaction developed between students and tutors in several types of forums implemented in a virtual course: presentation, doubts, debate, reflection, analysis. Finally, authors performed a comparative study using data and results gathered over two editions in an A/B testing configuration. The results in this study provide evidence that despite the inherent openness behind MOOCs, participants should be encouraged to have a commitment to finish the courses and the standalone discussion forums will not be the only element to consider. In fact the Social Network Analysis will play an important role in a learning ecosystem.

Keywords

Interaction analysis Engagement Learning ecosystem 

References

  1. 1.
    Gómez-Aguilar, D.A., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Therón, R.: Analítica Visual en eLearning. El Profesional de la Información 23, 236–245 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    García-Holgado, A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Human interaction in learning ecosystems based on open source solutions. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2018. LNCS, vol. 10924, pp. 218–232. Springer, Cham (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91743-6_17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    García-Holgado, A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: The evolution of the technological ecosystems: an architectural proposal to enhancing learning processes. In: García-Peñalvo, F.J. (ed.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, TEEM 2013, 14–15 November 2013, Salamanca, Spain, pp. 565–571. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    García-Holgado, A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Architectural pattern to improve the definition and implementation of eLearning ecosystems. Sci. Comput. Program. 129, 20–34 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2016.03.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    García-Holgado, A., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: A metamodel proposal for developing learning ecosystems. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2017. LNCS, vol. 10295, pp. 100–109. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58509-3_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siemens, G.: What is Learning Analytics (2010). http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2010/08/25/what-are-learning-analytics/. Accessed 10 Mar 2011
  7. 7.
    Ferguson, R.: Learning Analytics: answering the FAQ’s. Retrieved from Open University (2014). http://es.slideshare.net/R3beccaF/learning-analytics-fa-qs
  8. 8.
    Pardo, A., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Mirriahi, N.: Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 50, 128–138 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferguson, R.: Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 4(5/6), 304–317 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Oliva-Córdova, L.M., Amado-Salvatierra, H.R., Monterroso, L.: El potencial de aplicar Analíticas de Aprendizaje en Guatemala, creación de una comunidad para desarrollar la investigación educativa en la era digital (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Filvà, D.A., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Forment, M.A.: Social network analysis approaches for social learning support. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, pp. 269–274. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M.L., Esteban-Escaño, J., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Conde, M.Á.: Learning analytics to identify the influence of leadership on the academic performance of work teams. In: García-Peñalvo, F.J. (ed.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, TEEM 2016, 2–4 November 2016, Salamanca, Spain, pp. 377–382. ACM, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M.L., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Conde-González, M.Á.: Using learning analytics to improve teamwork assessment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 47, 149–156 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Conde, M.Á., Hérnandez-García, Á., García-Peñalvo, F., Séin-Echaluce, M.L.: Exploring student interactions: learning analytics tools for student tracking. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2015. LNCS, vol. 9192, pp. 50–61. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20609-7_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hernández, R., Amado-Salvatierra, H.R.: Towards full engagement for open online education. A practical experience for a MicroMaster. In: Delgado, K.C., Jermann, P., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Seaton, D., White, S. (eds.) EMOOCs 2017. LNCS, vol. 10254, pp. 68–76. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59044-8_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Batanero, C., Karhu, M., Holvikivi, J., Otón, S., Amado-Salvatierra, H.R.: A method to evaluate accessibility in e-learning education systems. In: 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 556–560. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martin, J.L., Amado-Salvatierra, H.R., Hilera, J.R.: MOOCs for all: evaluating the accessibility of top MOOC platforms. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 32(5), 2274–2283 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gottardo, E., Noronha, R.V.: Social networks applied to distance education courses: analysis of interaction in discussion forums. In: Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web, pp. 355–358. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Salmon, G.: E-Tivities: The Key to Active Online Learning. Routledge, Abingdon (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Molenda, M.: In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Perform. Improv. 42(5), 34–36 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Silveira, I.F., Villalba-Condori, K.O.: An open perspective for educational games. J. Inf. Technol. Res. (JITR) 11(1), 18–28 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.4018/JITR.2018010102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vera, J., Villalba-Condori, K., Castro Cuba-Sayco, S.: Modelo de sistema de recomendaciónbasadoen el contexto a partirdelanálisis de códigoestático para el desarrollo del Pensamiento Computacional: Caso de Programación Web. Educ. Knowl. Soc. (EKS) 19(2), 103–126 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2018192103126CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad de San Carlos de GuatemalaGuatemala CityGuatemala
  2. 2.Universidad GalileoGuatemala CityGuatemala
  3. 3.Universidad Nacional de San Agustín PerúArequipaPeru

Personalised recommendations