Adaptive Learning Case Studies Implementation at Architectural BIM Construction Courses

  • Jose FerrándizEmail author
  • David FonsecaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11590)


This paper aims to detail the changes in two BIM construction courses of the architecture degree at the American University of Ras Al Khaimah (AURAK), and the process of analyzing the data collected from them. At the course level we explain the changes effected in the grading criteria and the adaptive approach of the teaching material. At the methodology level we describe the types of data collected and the statistical analysis methods. These elements will establish a clear reproducible pedagogical methodology, clarifying its benefits and scientific, reproducible and proven analysis method.


BIM AEC Curriculum Higher education Mixed methods Enhanced learning User centered evaluation Motivation Satisfaction User profile 


  1. 1.
    Miettinen, R., Paavola, S.: Beyond the BIM utopia: approaches to the development and implementation of building information modeling. Autom. Constr. 43, 84–91 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sabongi, F.J., Arch, M.: The integration of BIM in the undergraduate curriculum: an analysis of undergraduate courses, pp. 1–4 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McAuley, B., Hore, A., West, R.: BICP Global BIM Study (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chasey, A., Pavelko, C.: Industry expectations help drive BIM in today’s university undergraduate curriculum (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nejat, A., Darwish, M., Ghebrab, T.: BIM teaching strategy for construction engineering students, p. 25.262 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barison, M.B., Santos, E.T.: BIM teaching strategies: an overview of the current approaches. In: Proceedings of the ICCCBE 2010 International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferrandiz, J.: The implementation of BIM in the introductory building construction course at the United Arab Emirates University, pp. 130–137 (2016).
  8. 8.
    Barison, M.B., Santosi, E.T.: BIM teaching: current international trends. Des. Manag. Technol. 6, 67–80 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bastos, B.A., Fonseca, J.Á.L., Gomes, A.V.M.S., Santos, A.A.: Implantação de tecnologia BIM na incorporação imobiliária. In: TIC 2011: V Encontro de Tecnologia de Informação e Comunicação na Construção (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mitchell, D.: 5D BIM: creating cost certainty and better buildings, pp. 1–9 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hietanen, J., Drogemuller, R.: Approaches to a university level BIM education. In: IABSE Conference (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kymmell, W.: Building Information Modeling: Planning and Managing Construction Projects with 4D CAD and Simulations. McGraw-Hill Construction Series. McGraw Hill Professional, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fonseca, D., Redondo, E., Villagrasa, S.: Mixed-methods research: a new approach to evaluating the motivation and satisfaction of university students using advanced visual technologies. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 14, 311–332 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferrandiz, J., Fonseca, D., Banawi, A.: Mixed method assessment for BIM implementation in the AEC curriculum. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2016. LNCS, vol. 9753, pp. 213–222. Springer, Cham (2016). Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burgos, D., Tattersall, C., Koper, R.: Representing adaptive eLearning strategies in IMS learning design. Educational Technology Expertise Centre (OTEC) (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burgos, D., Ruiz-Mezcua, B.: Building an interactive training methodology to develop multimedia (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    He, S., Kinshuk, H.H., Patel, A.: Granular approach to adaptivity in problem-based learning environment. In: Proceedings of ICALT, pp. 3–7 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Shea, P., Pelz, W., Swan, K.: Student satisfaction and perceived learning with on-line courses: principles and examples from the SUNY learning network. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 4, 7–41 (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pintrich, P.R., De Groot, E.V.: Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. J. Educ. Psychol. 82, 33 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tseng, S., Su, J.-M., Hwang, G., Hwang, G., Tsai, C.-C., Tsai, C.J.: An object-oriented course framework for developing adaptive learning systems. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 11, 171–191 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ferrandiz, J., Banawi, A., Peña, E.: Evaluating the benefits of introducing “BIM” based on Revit in construction courses, without changing the course schedule. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 17, 491–501 (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fonseca, D., Villagrasa, S., Valls, F., Redondo, E., Climent, A., Vicent, L.: Engineering teaching methods using hybrid technologies based on the motivation and assessment of student’s profiles, pp. 1–8 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wilcoxon, F.: Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom. Bull. 1, 80–83 (1945)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nachar, N.: The Mann-Whitney U: a test for assessing whether two independent samples come from the same distribution. Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol. 4, 13–20 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Neuhäuser, M.: Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. In: Lovric, M. (ed.) Anonymous International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, pp. 1656–1658. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fay, M.P., Proschan, M.A.: Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney or t-test? On assumptions for hypothesis tests and multiple interpretations of decision rules. Stat. Surv. 4, 1–39 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McElduff, F., Cortina-Borja, M., Chan, S., Wade, A.: When t-tests or Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests won’t do. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 34, 128 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    DePuy, V., Berger, V.W., Zhou, Y.: Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test (2005)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Analyse-it: Multiple comparison procedures for the means/medians of independent samples (2018). Accessed 23 Feb 2018
  30. 30.
    Ferrandiz, J., Gonzalo, F.D.A., Sanchez-Sepulveda, M., Fonseca, D.: Introducing a new ICT tool in an active learning environment course: performance consequences depending on the introduction design. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 35, 360–371 (2019)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ferrandiz, J.: BIM* implementation in the AEC* curriculum: a quasi-experimental case study of the Architectural Engineering (AE) Bachelor’s degree at the United Arab Emirates University (UAEU). Dissertation, Etsab (universidad politecnica de catalunya) (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of TechnologyNorfolk State Universty, NSUNorfolkUSA
  2. 2.GRETEL- Grup de Recerca en Technology Enhanced LearningLa Salle Universitat Ramon LlullBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations