Creative Learning and Artefacts Making: Promises and Challenges in Practice

  • Eliana Alves MoreiraEmail author
  • Marleny Luque Carbajal
  • Maria Cecília Calani Baranauskas
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11590)


In an increasingly technological world of constant change, encouraging the development of skills such as creativity is becoming increasingly important. In this sense, Creative Learning and Maker Movement can be explored to enrich the learning process in subjects such as science, mathematics and computing. In this paper we explore and discuss the use of electronic components to create physical objects in support for science teaching. We investigate how children and their teachers make sense of the technological concepts and aspects involved in the object’s construction. We carried out eight Workshops where we worked out four different scenarios. At the end of each Workshop, the children and teachers assessed their affective states regarding the activities. In general, children were very happy and motivated with the maker activities, but not all of them felt in control of the activity. Teachers showed less motivation in the activities whose construction was more elaborate, and showed less control, suggesting that the technological aspects are still a challenge for them.


Creative learning Maker movement School 



This work was also supported by the Federal Institute of São Paulo, CNPq (# 306272/2017-2), CAPES (#1545149/2015, #1654045/2016), FAPESP (#2015/16528-0), Division of Child and Supplementary Education, Social Benefit Manager Group and Institute of Computing at University of Campinas.


  1. 1.
    Iba, T.: An autopoietic systems theory for creativity. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 2(4), 6610–6625 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jeffrey, B.: Creative teaching and learning: towards a common discourse and practice. Cambridge J. Educ. 36(3), 399–414 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iba, T., Ichikawa, C., Sakamoto, M., Yamazaki, T.: Pedagogical patterns for creative learning. In: Proceedings of 18th Conference on Pattern Language Programs - PLoP 2011, pp. 1–6 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sefton-Green, J., Thomson, P., Jones, K., Bresler, L.: The Routledge International Handbook of Creative Learning, vol. 35, no. 3. Routledge, Abingdon (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anzai, Y., Simon, H.A.: The theory of learning by doing. Psychol. Rev. 86(2), 124–140 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Papert, S.: Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Craft, A., Cremin, T., Burnard, P.: Creative learning: an emergent concept. In: Creative Learning 3-11: and How We Document It (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Halverson, E.R., Sheridan, K.: The maker movement in education. Harv. Educ. Rev. 84(4), 495–504 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martinez, S.L., Stager, G.: Invent to Learn: Making, Tinkering, and Engineering in the Classroom. Constructing Modern Knowledge Press, Torrance (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hatch, M.: The maker movement manifesto. Mak. Mov. Manif. 1–31 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martin, L.: The promise of the maker movement for education. J. Pre-College Eng. Educ. Res. 5(1), 4 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chu, S.L., Schlegel, R., Quek, F., Christy, A., Chen, K.: ‘I Make, Therefore I Am’. In: Proceedings of 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors Computer Systems - CHI 2017, pp. 109–120 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gershenfeld, N.: Fab: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop–from Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication. Basic Books Inc., New York (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chu, S.L., Deuermeyer, E., Quek, F.: Supporting scientific modeling through curriculum-based making in elementary school science classes. Int. J. Child-Comput. Interact. 16, 1–8 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Qi, J., Buechley, L.: Sketching in circuits: designing and building electronics on paper. In: Proceedings of Human Factors Computer System, pp. 1713–1721 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Panjwani, A.: Constructing meaning: designing powerful story-making explorations for children to express with tangible computational media. In: Proceedings of 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 358–364 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 25(1), 49–59 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Revolução Artesanal, “Cachorro-Origami”. Accessed 02 Feb 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eliana Alves Moreira
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Marleny Luque Carbajal
    • 2
  • Maria Cecília Calani Baranauskas
    • 2
  1. 1.Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of São PauloGuarulhosBrazil
  2. 2.Institute of ComputingUniversity of Campinas (UNICAMP)CampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations