Advertisement

Fables for Teachers and Pupils

Incrementally Defined Scenario-Based, Interactive and Spatial Stories
  • Andrea ValenteEmail author
  • Emanuela Marchetti
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11590)

Abstract

The Fables project is grounded on an ecological approach to e-learning, where we analyze the practice of e-learning as an information ecology, centered on the interaction among teachers, pupils and their tools, placed within the classroom. A simple Fable represents one of Schön’s exemplars; a Fable can be interacted with digitally, as a simulation, to help understand and predict the behavior of a real-world system or scenario. In schools Fables can be used to represent the knowledge that pupils have, to be shared/showed interactively to others, and they are experienced as a more dynamic version of presentation slides. In this paper we strengthen the formal definition of Fables, and we investigate Fables’ expressive power. A new version of the online Fables tool F4BL3s has been implemented and used in the evaluation. The main new features of this version are: better visualization of Fables in playback, possibility for the authors to associate custom images to the characters in their Fables, and new export functions to convert a Fable into Twine stories and Microsoft PowerPoint compatible slides. According to our knowledge of the needs of teachers and pupils, the last feature is needed to improve interoperability of F4BL3s with other standard tools, which is in turn a key factor for the acceptance of the tool. Future work includes an improved visual editor as suggested by the data from our evaluation, and continue in-classroom tests.

Keywords

Scenario-based learning Education Knowledge management Simulation Visualization 

References

  1. 1.
    Marchetti, E., Valente, A.: It takes three - re-contextualizing game-based learning among teachers, developers and learners. In: Connoly, T., Boyle, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the European Conference on Games Based Learning, pp. 399–406. Academic Conferences International (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schön, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Ashgate, Farnham (1986)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sangiorgi, D., Valente, A.: A distributed abstract machine for safe ambients. In: Orejas, F., Spirakis, P.G., van Leeuwen, J. (eds.) ICALP 2001. LNCS, vol. 2076, pp. 408–420. Springer, Heidelberg (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48224-5_34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Love, S., Gkatzidou, V., Conti, A.: Using a rich pictures approach for gathering students and teachers digital education requirements. In: Little, L., Fitton, D., Bell, B., Toth, N. (eds.) Perspectives on HCI Research with Teenagers. HCIS. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33450-9_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., Hillgren, P.A.: Participatory design and “democratizing innovation”. In: Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, pp. 41–50. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moore, C.: Map It: The Hands-On Guide to Strategic Training Design. Montesa Press (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Friedhoff, J.: Untangling twine: a platform study. In: Proceedings of the 2013 DiGRA International Conference (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rothamel, T.: Visual novel engine Ren’Py. https://www.renpy.org/. Accessed 1 Feb 2019
  10. 10.
    Prastowo, B.N.: Design and implementation e-learning system using Ren’Py based visual novel. Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Valente, A., Marchetti, E.: Fables – exploring natural ways of expressing behavior to create digital simulations. In: Marcus, A., Wang, W. (eds.) DUXU 2018. LNCS, vol. 10919, pp. 110–126. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91803-7_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nardi, B.A., O’Day, V.: Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marchetti, E.: Occupational therapy and RPG games: a playful, ecological approach to healthcare education. In: ECREA 2018, the 7th European Communication Conference, Digital Library, Lugano, Switzerland (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J.: Research through design in HCI. In: Olson, J., Kellogg, W. (eds.) Ways of Knowing in HCI, pp. 167–189. Springer, New York (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Latour, B.: Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Benamar, L., Balagué, C., Ghassany, M.: The identification and influence of social roles in a social media product community. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 22, 337–362 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barbanera, F., Bugliesi, M., Dezani, M., Sassone, V.: Space-aware ambients and processes. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 373(1–2), 41–69 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lombardo, V., Battaglino, C., Pizzo, A., Damiano, R., Lieto, A.: Coupling conceptual modeling and rules for the annotation of dramatic media. Semant. Web 6(5), 503–534 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Drotner, K., Iversen, S.M.: Digitale Metoder. At skabe, analysere og dele data. Samfudslitteratur (2017)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kensing, F., Blomberg, J.: Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Comput. Support. Coop. Work (CSCW) 7(3–4), 167–185 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hook, A.D., Bodell, S.J., Griffiths, L.: A pilot project of the learning experience of undergraduate occupational therapy students in a three-dimensional virtual environment in the United Kingdom. Br. J. Occup. Ther. 78(9), 576–584 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bennet, S., Rodger, S., Fitzgerald, C., Gibson, L.: Simulation in occupational therapy curricula: a literature review. Aust. Occup. Ther. J. 64, 314–327 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Breaky, K.M., Levin, D., Miller, I., Hentges, K.E.: The use of scenario-based-learning interactive software to create custom virtual laboratory scenarios for teaching genetics. Genetics 179(3), 1151–1155 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Broadbent, J.: Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. Internet High. Educ. 33, 24–32 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marchetti, E., Valente, A.: A tangible digital installation in the classroom: role play and autistic children. In. Munkvold, R., Kolås, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Games Based Learning, pp. 346–353. Academic Conferences and Publishing International (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gros, B., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: Future trends in the design strategies and technological affordances of e-learning. In: Spector, M., Lockee, B., Childress, M. (eds.) Learning, Design, and Technology. An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, pp. 1–23. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_67-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Maersk Mc Kinney Moller Institute, Embodied Systems for Robotics and LearningUniversity of Southern Denmark (SDU)OdenseDenmark
  2. 2.Media Studies, Department for the Study of CultureUniversity of Southern Denmark (SDU)OdenseDenmark

Personalised recommendations