Abstract
In ancient, and often modern, scholarship every human attempt to cross the sea is philosophically handled with suspicion and pessimism. Philosophers and poets, from Lucretius to Nietzsche and from Horace and Virgil to Voltaire, seem to question ‘sea-crossing as an imprudent if not blasphemous moment, analogous to contravening the inviolability of the earth, i.e., breaking the law of the terra inviolata’. As a result, contravening the law of the land and state cannot but lead to a shipwreck. This chapter argues that this tradition of pessimism towards the symbolic inevitability of the shipwreck is shared by mainstream IR in the ways it fails to challenge its state-centred certainties in migration theorising and deems migrant suffering and loss of life unavoidable in the European refugee crisis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fotou, M. (2020). The Pessimism of the Shipwreck: Theorising Μigration in International Relations. In: Stevens, T., Michelsen, N. (eds) Pessimism in International Relations. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21780-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21780-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21779-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21780-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)