Skip to main content

Off-screen: Reimagining Animation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Screen Production

Abstract

Animation is nothing if not visual, and the screen presupposes this defining mode. Yet, interdependent of it being visual, animation is nothing if not movement. The moving image first emerged in devices like Plateau’s 1832 phenakistoscope and Horner’s 1834 zoetrope, both succeeded by Reynaud’s praxinoscope in 1872. The magic lantern slide shows of the later 1800s employed limited animation techniques. Such devices helped ignite late Victorian fascination with movement and technology. For over a century, animation has found its form as projected imagery, leaping out from various technical apparatuses to animate screens large and small in fleeting frames of captured movement. By thinking outside the projection screen altogether we can draw from concepts and practices outside the Western canon of technologies of the moving image: a 5000-year-old Iranian vase that depicts frame-like images of a jumping goat, Palaeolithic cave drawings showing ‘movement’ through overlaid instances of animal motion, the Japanese concept of mono no ke (‘alive-things’). Robots, butoh dance and other objects that animate through their physicality challenge us to reimagine animation. This strategy opens animation up to new conceptual relationships to the screen and to movement, respectively: identifying movement itself as definitive of our relationship to animation, screened or otherwise. The ‘illusion of life’ metaphor remains a popular definition of ‘animation’. What attracts us to the animated image is its animacy, perhaps reflecting a latent hylozoism in us still. From Greek, zōē ‘life’ + -tropos ‘turning’, the zoetrope is an interesting case in point. A plethora of animated physical zoetropes (for example at the Ghibli Museum in Tokyo) nurtures a fascination with movement and technology. Part of the thrill of these physical zoetropes is how mechanical objects afford the illusion of a moving image that, as the mechanism slows, reveals the relationship between us and the object that is described by movement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Burnt City pot (proto-cinematic animation) The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies, online http://www.cais-soas.com/News/2008/March2008/04-03.htm (accessed 2 October 2018).

  2. 2.

    The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation (1981) is also the title of a popular animator’s text book, written by Ollie Johnston and Frank Thomas, two of nine ‘master animators’ in Walt Disney’s studio. Cholodenko distances his use of the term ‘illusion’ in his own two volumes on animation from that of Walt Disney, describing the latter’s ‘illusion’ as ‘animation aspiring to a realism of depiction such as one associates with Hollywood live action cinema’ (Cholodenko, 2007: 51).

  3. 3.

    Barsamian’s large zoetrope ‘Juggler’ (1997) can be viewed here: https://gregorybarsamian.com/Juggler Accessed 21 September 2019.

References

  • Aristotle. (1986). De Anima (On the Soul) (H. Lawson-Tancred, Trans.). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsamian, G. (2008). Extracinematic Animation: Gregory Barsamian in Conversation with Suzanne Buchan. Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazin, A. (1960). The Ontology of the Photographic Image (H. Gray, Trans.). Film Quarterly, 13(4), 4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2015). Systems and Things: On Vital Materialism and Object-Oriented Philosophy. In R. Grusin (Ed.), Nonhuman Turn (pp. 223–240). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogost, I. (2012). Alien Phenomenology: Or What It Is Like to Be a Thing. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buchan, S. (2013). Pervasive Animation. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2009). Critique, Dissent, Disciplinarity. Critical Inquiry, 35(4), 773–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/599590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candlin, F., & Guins, R. (Eds.). (2009). The Object Reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cholodenko, A. (Ed.). (2007). The Illusion of Life II: More Essays on Animation. Sydney: Power Publications, University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1986). Cinema 1: The Movement Image (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, B. (1961 [1944]). Greek Science: Its Meaning For Us. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flusser, V. (2000). Towards a Philosophy of Photography (A. Mathews, Trans.). London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flusser, V. (2014). Gestures (N. A. Roth, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). Archaeology of Knowledge (A. M. S. Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. (2005). Guerrilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things. Chicago/La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1952/1790). Critique of Judgement: Part II, Critique of Teleological Judgement (J. C. Meredith, Trans). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1953 [1790]). Kant. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. (University of Chicago Press). Critique of Judgement (J. C. Meredith, Trans.). Reprinted by Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamarre, R. (2013). Coming to Life: Cartoon Animals and Natural Philosophy. In S. Buchan (Ed.), Pervasive Animation (pp. 117–142). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, M., Dovey, J., Giddings, S., Grant, I., & Kelly, K. (2009). New Media: A Critical Introduction. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. (2001). The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Online Etymology Dictionary. (2019). https://www.etymonline.com. Accessed 21 Sep 2019.

  • Peretz, E. (2017). The Off-Screen: An Investigation of the Cinematic Frame. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reinke, S. (2009). In C. Gehman & S. Reinke (eds.). The Sharpest Point: Animation at the End of Cinema (pp. 9–26). Toronto: YYZ Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Routt, W. (2007). De Anime. In A. Cholodenko (Ed.), The Illusion of Life 2 (pp. 172–190). Sydney: Power Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobchack, V. (2000). The Scene of the Screen: Envisioning Cinematic and Electronic “Presence”. In R. Stam & T. Miller (Eds.), Film and Theory: An Anthology. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, B. M. (2001). Devices of Wonder: From the World in a Box to Images on a Screen (exhibition catalogue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, F., & Johnston, O. (1981). The Illusion of Life. New York: Hyperion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torre, D. (2017). Animation-Process, Cognition and Actuality. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watsuji, T. (2013). Cited by Tanaka, K. 2013. Philosophizing Japanese Beauty: Aware, Yugen, Sabi, and Iki (in Japanese). Tokyo: Seitosha Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, P. (1998). Understanding Animation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, P. (2006). The Fundamentals of Animation. Lausanne: AVA Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. S. (2013). The Spirit of Noh: A New Translation of the Classic Noh Treatise the Fushikaden. Boston/London: Shambhala Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rose Woodcock .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Woodcock, R., Torre, L., Tosaki, E. (2019). Off-screen: Reimagining Animation. In: Batty, C., Berry, M., Dooley, K., Frankham, B., Kerrigan, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Screen Production. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21744-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics