Skip to main content

“Make it in Post”: Digital Visual Effects and the Temporality of Creative Value in Post-Production

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Palgrave Handbook of Screen Production
  • 904 Accesses

Abstract

Digital production has had a transformative impact on the temporal process of traditional screen production, such that screen content is not only “fixed in post” but now also “made in post.” However, industrial ideologies and production protocols related to digital visual effects (VFX) and post-production tacitly maintain distinctions between creative and technical skillsets and labour output across production stages, particularly between principal and post-production. This chapter focuses on the production culture concerning digital VFX, which productively reflects the complex temporal dynamics impacting the value of creativity in post-production more broadly. The production protocol “fix it in post” reflects a history of such ideologies that marginalise and devalue the contribution of post-production in the creative appraisal of screen output; moreover, the protocol expresses creative value in temporal terms, in which “after-ness” in the screen production process connotes technical activity of less creative value. Similarly, the distinction between special effects (SFX) and VFX terminology reinforces temporal boundaries between principal and post-production in the screen production workflow. As such, this chapter argues that the devaluing of creative activity in post-production is an ideological imperative driven by the temporal categorisation of “after-ness,” which implies a deferment, marginalisation, and decentralisation of creative value in the screen production process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Belton, J. (2012). Painting by the Numbers: The Digital Intermediate. Film Quarterly, 61(3), 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A. (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. T. (2008). Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Case, D. (2001). Film Technology in Post Production. New York: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cram, C. (2012). Digital Cinema: The Role of the Visual Effects Supervisor. Film History, 24, 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daigle, A. (2015). (Post)Production: Classifications and Infrastructures of Digital Visual Effects. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 32(3), 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinur, E. (2017). The Filmmaker’s Guide to Visual Effects: The Art and Techniques of VFX for Directors, Producers, Editors, and Cinematographers. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Finance, C. L., & Zwerman, S. (2010). The Visual Effects Producer: Understanding the Art and Business of VFX. Boston: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, M., & Morie, J. F. (2010). Introduction. In J. A. Okun & S. Zwerman (Eds.), The VES Handbook of Visual Effect: Industry Standard VFX Practices and Procedures (pp. 1–15). Burlington: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaut, B., & Kieran, M. (Eds.). (2018). Creativity and Philosophy. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2016). Introducing Creativity and Culture, the Emerging Field. In V. P. Glăveanu (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity and Culture Research (pp. 1–12). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goulekas, K. E. (Ed.). (2001). Visual Effects in a Digital World: A Comprehensive Glossary of Over 7000 Visual Effects Terms. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, C. (2017). Cinematography: Practice as Research, Research into Practice. In C. Batty & S. Kerrigan (Eds.), Screen Practice Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry (pp. 143–159). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R. M. (1986). Trick Cinematography: The Oscar Special-Effects Movies. Jefferson: McFarland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, D. (2003). A Flexible Finish. American Cinematographer, 84(4), Retrieved from https://theasc.com/magazine/april03/sub/index.html

  • Kaufman, D. (2009, July 1). DP Dante Spinotti on Public Enemies. Studio Daily. Retrieved from http://www.studiodaily.com/2009/07/dpa‚a-dante-spinotti-on-public-enemies/

  • Kaufman, D. (2018, January 2). VFX Screen Credits: The Quest for Recognition and Respect. VFX Voice: The Magazine of the Visual Effects Society. Retrieved from http://vfxvoice.com/vfx-screen-credits-the-quest-for-recognition-and-respect/

  • Mason, J. H. (2003). The Value of Creativity: The Origin and Emergence of a Modern Belief. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, V., Banks, M. J., & Caldwell, J. T. (2009). Production Studies: Roots and Routes. In V. Mayer, M. J. Banks, & J. T. Caldwell (Eds.), Production Studies: Cultural Studies of the Media Industries (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McAlister, M. J. (1993). The Language of Visual Effects. Los Angeles: Lone Eagle Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, P. (2012). Creativity and Cultural Production: Issues for Media Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Navas, E. (2018). Art, Media Design, and Postproduction: Open Guidelines on Appropriation and Remix. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Negus, N., & Pickering, M. (2004). Creativity, Communication and Cultural Value. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, S. (2012). Digital Visual Effects in Cinema: The Seduction of Reality. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, M. (2009). Privilege and Distinction in Production Worlds: Copyright, Collective Bargaining, and Working Conditions in Media Making. In V. Mayer, M. J. Banks, & J. T. Caldwell (Eds.), Production Studies: Cultural Studies of the Media Industries (pp. 54–67). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uricchio, W. (2014). Film, Cinema, Television … Media? New Review of Film and Television Studies, 12(3), 266–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaziri, T. [tvaziri]. (2018, July 3). Visual Effects Are Created by People, Not Computers [Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/tvaziri/status/1013818417600581633

  • Wyatt, H., & Amyes, T. (2005). Audio Post Production for Television and Film: An Introduction to Technology and Techniques. Oxford: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tara Lomax .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lomax, T. (2019). “Make it in Post”: Digital Visual Effects and the Temporality of Creative Value in Post-Production. In: Batty, C., Berry, M., Dooley, K., Frankham, B., Kerrigan, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Screen Production. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21744-0_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics