Skip to main content

Creative Filmmaking Processes, Procedures and Practices: Embodied and Internalized Filmmaking Agency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Screen Production

Abstract

Filmmaking is a creative practice. However, what do we mean when we use the term ‘creative practice’? This chapter explores the terms ‘creative’ and ‘practice’ by examining what has been called the creative system in action (McIntyre et al., The Creative System in Action – Understanding Cultural Production and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016). Drawing on the research literature from psychology and sociology, a link to ‘filmmaking’ will be made through media and cultural production scholarship (McIntyre, Creativity and Cultural Production: Issues for Media Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.). Using examples from independent documentary filmmaking (Kerrigan, Using Fort Scratchley (DVD), Fort Scratchley. Australia: PhD Productions, 2008; Journal of Media Practice, 14(2), 111–127, 2013) and fictional television serial production, this discussion will illustrate how creative filmmaking practices are aligned with confluence models of creativity (Csikszentmihalyi, Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity. In R. Stenberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity, Cambridge (pp. 313–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), group creativity models and staged creative process theories (Bastick, Intuition, How We Think and Act. Chichester/New York: Wiley, 1982; Csikszentmihalyi, Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperCollins, 1996). Examining the complexity of the daily choices made by the conditioned agent, in this case a filmmaker, the discussion will focus on the decision-making process of factual and fiction filmmaking and how it connects to creative practice (Kerrigan in McIntyre et al., The Creative System in Action – Understanding Cultural Production and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016). This will necessarily involve the methods and processes used by the filmmaker, as they develop an intuitive approach to their practice which becomes embodied knowledge that enables them to work within a collaborative, social and cultural system. This scholarly approach to the term ‘creative practice’ will provide an understanding of how a filmmaker can apply work from other disciplines to bring new insights to ways of regarding filmmaking as a creative practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M., & Holquist, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press Slavic series, University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastick, T. (1982). Intuition: How We Think and Act. Chichester/New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, C., & Kerrigan, S. (2018). Screen Production Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berkeley, L. (2008). How to Change the World [Motion Picture]. Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkeley, L. (2011). Between Chaos and Control: Improvisation in the Screen Production Process. TEXT Special Issue No 11 ASPERA: New Screens, New Producers, New Learning. Retrieved from http://www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue11/content.htm

  • Berkeley, L. (2018). Lights, Camera, Research: The Specificity of Research in Screen Production. In C. Batty & S. Kerrigan (Eds.), Screen Production Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry (pp. 29–46). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. (1990). The Creative Mind: Myths & Mechanisms. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). Field of Cultural Production (R. Johnson, Ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity. In R. Stenberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity, Cambridge (pp. 313–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischlin, D., & Heble, A. (2004). The Other Side of Nowhere: Jazz, Improvisation and Communities in Dialogue. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giglio, K. (2012). Writing the Comedy Blockbuster: The Inappropriate Goal (1st ed.). Studio City: Michael Weise Productions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, C. (2010). Cinematographer and Camera Crew: Practice, Process and Procedure. In B. Bräuchler & J. Postill (Eds.), Theorising Media and Practice (4th ed., pp. 303–325). Bristol: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, C. (2018). Cinematography: Practice as Research, Research into Practice. In C. Batty & S. Kerrigan (Eds.), Screen Production Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerrigan, S. (2008). Using Fort Scratchley (DVD), Fort Scratchley. Australia: PhD Productions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerrigan, S. (2011). Creative Documentary Practice: Internalising the Systems Model of Creativity Through Documentary Video and Online Practice. PhD Thesis, University of Newcastle, Newcastle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerrigan, S. (2013). Accommodating Creative Documentary Practice Within a Revised Systems Model of Creativity. Journal of Media Practice, 14(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmpr.14.2.111_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerrigan, S. (2016). The Spectator in the Film-Maker: Re-Framing Filmology Through Creative Film-Making Practices. Journal of Media Practice, 17(2–3), 186–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerrigan, S. (2017). Filmmaking as Creative Practice: Assessing Creative Magnitude and Scale. Global Media Journal: Australian Edition, 10(2), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerrigan, S. (2018). Innovation in the Arts – Collaborative and Creative Filmmaking Processes. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Group Creativity and Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerrigan, S., & McIntyre, P. (2010). The ‘Creative Treatment of Actuality’: Rationalising and Reconceptualising the Notion of Creativity for Documentary Practice. Journal of Media Practice, 11(2), 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerrigan, S., Berkeley, L., Maher, S., Sergi, M., & Wotherspoon, A. (2015). Screen Production Enquiry: A Study of Five Australian Doctorates. Studies in Australasian Cinema, 9(2), 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, E. (2015). The Raven on the Jetty [Film]. UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, E. (2016). The Total Filmmaker: Thinking of Screenwriting, Directing and Editing as One Role. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 13(1), 109–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, E. (2018). Method in Madness: A Case Study in Practice Research Methods. In C. Batty & S. Kerrigan (Eds.), Screen Production Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry (pp. 112–142). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, P. (2012). Creativity and Cultural Production: Issues for Media Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, P., Fulton, J., & Paton, E. (2016). The Creative System in Action – Understanding Cultural Production and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleweek, B., & Tulloch, J. (2018). Afterward: Tacit Knowledge and Affect – Soft Ethnography and Shared Domains. In C. Batty & S. Kerrigan (Eds.), Screen Production Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry (pp. 233–248). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pearlman, K. (2009). Cutting Rhythms: Shaping the Film Edit. New York: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearlman, K. (2016). Cutting Rhythms: Intuitive Film Editing (2nd ed.). New York: Focal Press. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/1056422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearlman, K. (2017). Editing and Cognition beyond Continuity. Projections (New York), 11, 2). 67–2). 86. https://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2017.110205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, D. (1991). Creativity and Constraint in the British Film Industry. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2003). Improvised Dialogues: Emergence and Creativity in Conversation. Westport: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2006). Explaining Creativity – The Science of Human Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H., & Dean, R. (2009). Practice-Led Research and Research-Led Practice in the Creative Arts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (2014). The Model Screenwriter: A Comedy Case Study. In: Minding the Gap: Refereed Proceedings of the 19th Conference of the Australasian Association of Writing Programs 2014 (pp. 1–20). Retrieved from: http://www.aawp. org.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Taylor_S_The_Model_Screenwriter.pdf. Accessed 8 Aug 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Kerrigan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kerrigan, S., McIntyre, P. (2019). Creative Filmmaking Processes, Procedures and Practices: Embodied and Internalized Filmmaking Agency. In: Batty, C., Berry, M., Dooley, K., Frankham, B., Kerrigan, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Screen Production. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21744-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics