Skip to main content

Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) and Anti-Reflux MucoSectomy (ARMS) for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gastrointestinal Interventional Endoscopy
  • 1059 Accesses

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition traditionally treated by lifestyle modifications, medications, and surgery. In this chapter, we discuss some of the available endoscopic therapies for GERD such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS).

RFA is a catheter-based system that delivers energy to the lower esophagus and gastric cardia. It has been available for many years; however, stringent long-term data is currently lacking which limits its clinical application. ARMS is the mucosal or submucosal resection of distal esophagus and gastric cardia along the lesser curvature. Short-term data is promising but long-term data is lacking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. El-Serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC, et al. Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2014;63:871–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:308–28; quiz 329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Broeders JA, Rijnhart-de Jong HG, Draaisma WA, et al. Ten-year outcome of laparoscopic and conventional nissen fundoplication: randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2009;250:698–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nabi Z, Reddy DN. Endoscopic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: revisited. Clin Endosc. 2016;49:408–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Triadafilopoulos G. Endoscopic options for gastroesophageal reflux: where are we now and what does the future hold? Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016;18:47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Triadafilopoulos G, Clarke JO, Hawn M. Precision GERD management for the 21st century. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30:1–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pandolfino JE, Krishnan K. Do endoscopic antireflux procedures fit in the current treatment paradigm of gastroesophageal reflux disease? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:544–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Noar M, Squires P. Radiofrequency energy delivery to the lower esophageal sphincter: toward a precise understanding of Stretta technology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:406–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim MS, Holloway RH, Dent J, et al. Radiofrequency energy delivery to the gastric cardia inhibits triggering of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and gastroesophageal reflux in dogs. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tam WC, Schoeman MN, Zhang Q, et al. Delivery of radiofrequency energy to the lower oesophageal sphincter and gastric cardia inhibits transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations and gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with reflux disease. Gut. 2003;52:479–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Arts J, Bisschops R, Blondeau K, et al. A double-blind sham-controlled study of the effect of radiofrequency energy on symptoms and distensibility of the gastro-esophageal junction in GERD. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:222–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Corley DA, Katz P, Wo JM, et al. Improvement of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms after radiofrequency energy: a randomized, sham-controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:668–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aziz AM, El-Khayat HR, Sadek A, et al. A prospective randomized trial of sham, single-dose Stretta, and double-dose Stretta for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:818–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Coron E, Sebille V, Cadiot G, et al. Clinical trial: radiofrequency energy delivery in proton pump inhibitor-dependent gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28:1147–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Perry KA, Banerjee A, Melvin WS. Radiofrequency energy delivery to the lower esophageal sphincter reduces esophageal acid exposure and improves GERD symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:283–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lipka S, Kumar A, Richter JE. No evidence for efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:1058–67.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Satodate H, Inoue H, Yoshida T, et al. Circumferential EMR of carcinoma arising in Barrett’s esophagus: case report. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:288–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Satodate H, Inoue H, Fukami N, et al. Squamous reepithelialization after circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection of superficial carcinoma arising in Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy. 2004;36:909–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Inoue H, Ito H, Ikeda H, et al. Anti-reflux mucosectomy for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the absence of hiatus hernia: a pilot study. Ann Gastroenterol. 2014;27:346–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. DeMeester TR, Johnson LF. The evaluation of objective measurements of gastroesophageal reflux and their contribution to patient management. Surg Clin North Am. 1976;56:39–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hill LD, Kozarek RA, Kraemer SJ, et al. The gastroesophageal flap valve: in vitro and in vivo observations. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:541–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Inoue H, Sumi K, Tatsuta T, et al. 998 Clinical results of antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) for refractory gerd. Gastrointest Endosc;85:AB120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bapaye A, Reddy Gangireddy SS, Mahadik M, et al. 999 Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) for refractory gerd and initial clinical experience. Gastrointest Endosc;85:AB120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chuttani R, de Moura DT, Cohen J. 852 Clear: cardia ligation anti-reflux procedure for gerd. Gastrointest Endosc;85:AB110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hazem Hammad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

ARMS procedure (MOV 63633 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brimhall, B., Maydeo, A., Wagh, M.S., Hammad, H. (2020). Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) and Anti-Reflux MucoSectomy (ARMS) for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. In: Wagh, M., Wani, S. (eds) Gastrointestinal Interventional Endoscopy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21695-5_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21695-5_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21694-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21695-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics