Skip to main content

Time-to-Birth Prediction Models and the Influence of Expert Opinions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2019)

Abstract

Preterm birth is the leading cause of death among children under five years old. The pathophysiology and etiology of preterm labor are not yet fully understood. This causes a large number of unnecessary hospitalizations due to high–sensitivity clinical policies, which has a significant psychological and economic impact. In this study, we present a predictive model, based on a new dataset containing information of 1,243 admissions, that predicts whether a patient will give birth within a given time after admission. Such a model could provide support in the clinical decision-making process. Predictions for birth within 48 h or 7 days after admission yield an Area Under the Curve of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUC) of 0.72 for both tasks. Furthermore, we show that by incorporating predictions made by experts at admission, which introduces a potential bias, the prediction effectiveness increases to an AUC score of 0.83 and 0.81 for these respective tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alleman, B.W., et al.: A proposed method to predict preterm birth using clinical data, standard maternal serum screening, and cholesterol. AJOG 208(6), 472-e1 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allouche, M., et al.: Development & validation of nomograms for predicting ptb. AJOG 204(3), 242 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Behrman, R.E., Butler, A.S., et al.: Societal costs of preterm birth (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beta, J., et al.: Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery from maternal factors, obstetric history and placental perfusion and function at 11–13 weeks. Prenat. Diagn. 31(1), 75–83 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Celik, E., et al.: Cervical length and obstetric history predict sptb: development & validation of a model to provide individualized risk assessment. UOG 31(5), 549–554 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Silva, D.A., et al.: Timing of delivery in a high-risk obstetric population: a clinical prediction model. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17(1), 202 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. García-Blanco, A., et al.: Can stress biomarkers predict preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labor? Psychoneuroendocrinology 83, 19–24 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, L., et al.: Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the sustainable development goals. Lancet 388(10063), 3027–3035 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mailath-Pokorny, M., et al.: Individualized assessment of preterm birth risk using two modified prediction models. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 186, 42–48 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meertens, L.J., et al.: Prediction models for the risk of spontaneous preterm birth based on maternal characteristics: a systematic review and independent external validation. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 97(8), 907–920 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Melamed, N., et al.: Association between antenatal corticosteroid administration-to-birth interval and outcomes of preterm neonates. Obstet. Gynecol. 125(6), 1377–1384 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Menon, R., et al.: Multivariate adaptive regression splines analysis to predict biomarkers of spontaneous preterm birth. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 93(4), 382–391 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Roelens, K., et al.: Prevention of preterm birth in women at risk: Selected topics. Technical report, Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sananes, N., et al.: Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery in the first trimester of pregnancy. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 171(1), 18–22 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schaaf, J.M., et al.: Development of a prognostic model for predicting spontaneous singleton preterm birth. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 164(2), 150–155 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tan, H., et al.: Early prediction of preterm birth for singleton, twin, and triplet pregnancies. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 131(2), 132–137 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tekesin, I., et al.: Evaluation and validation of a new risk score (cleopatra score) to predict the probability of premature delivery for patients with threatened preterm labor. UOG 26(7), 699–706 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. To, M., et al.: Prediction of patient-specific risk of early preterm delivery using maternal history and sonographic measurement of cervical length. UOG 27(4), 362–367 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsiartas, P., et al.: Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery in women with threatened preterm labour: a prospective cohort study of multiple proteins in maternal serum. BJOG 119(7), 866–873 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Baaren, G.J., et al.: Risk factors for preterm delivery: do they add to fetal fibronectin testing and cervical length measurement in the prediction of preterm delivery in symptomatic women? Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 192, 79–85 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vandewiele, G., et al.: A decision support system to follow up and diagnose primary headache patients using semantically enriched data. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 18(1), 98 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vovsha, I., et al.: Predicting preterm birth is not elusive: machine learning paves the way to individual wellness. In: 2014 AAAI Symposia (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Watson, H., et al.: Quipp app: a safe alternative to a treat-all strategy for threatened preterm labor. UOG 50(3), 342–346 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by imec, the PRETURN clinical trial (B670201836255, EC/2018/0609) and a Ph.D. SB fellow scholarship of FWO (1S31417N).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilles Vandewiele .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vandewiele, G. et al. (2019). Time-to-Birth Prediction Models and the Influence of Expert Opinions. In: Riaño, D., Wilk, S., ten Teije, A. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11526. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21642-9_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21642-9_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21641-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21642-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics