Skip to main content

Changes and Political Support: What Is the Role of Context?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Citizens and Democracy in Europe

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology ((PSEPS))

  • 365 Accesses

Abstract

What is the state of satisfaction with democracy and political trust in Europe? What can explain over-time changes and cross-national differences in the evaluative side of political support? Are the contextual factors linked to the input—power distribution and representation—and the output—quality of government, economic performance and inequality—sides of the political system important? How do individual-level heterogeneities come into the picture? Finally, does the context affect individual differences in political support? This concluding chapter summarizes the main findings of the empirical analyses addressing this book’s research questions, and it discusses their main implications and avenues for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005). Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, D. (1991). The Legitimation of Power. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bélanger, É. (2004). Antipartyism and third-party vote choice: A comparison of Canada, Britain and Australia. Comparative Political Studies, 37(9), 1054–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bélanger, É. (2017). Political trust and voting behaviour. In S. Zmerli & T. W. G. van der Meer (Eds.), Handbook on Political Trust (pp. 242–255). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bé́langer, É., & Nadeau, R. (2005). Political trust and the vote in multiparty elections: The Canadian case. European Journal of Political Research, 44(1), 121–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castanho Silva, B. (2017). Contemporary populism: Actors, causes and consequences across 28 democracies. Ph.D. thesis, Central European University, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Y. H., Bratton, M., Shastri, S., & Tessler, M. (2008). Public opinion and democratic legitimacy. Journal of Democracy, 19(1), 74–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Criado, H., & Herreros, F. (2007). Political support: Taking into account the institutional context. Comparative Political Studies, 40(12), 1511–1532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy: Towards Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotti Sani, G. M., & Magistro, B. (2016). Increasingly unequal? The economic crisis, social inequalities and trust in the European Parliament in 20 European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 246–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1975). A reassessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrin, M., & Kriesi, H. (2016). How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilley, B. (2006). The meaning and measure of state legitimacy: Results for 72 countries. European Journal of Political Research, 45(3), 693–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Herrera H., Morelli, M., & Sonno, T. (2017). Demand and supply of populism (CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP11871). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2924731.

  • Hawkins, K. A., Carlin, R. E., Littvay, L., & Rovira Kaltwasser C. (2019). The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory and Analysis. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., Grander, E., Lachat, R., Dolenzal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frei, T. (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., & Pappas, T. S. (2015). European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Colchester: ECPR press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M., Sacks, A., & Tyler, T. (2009). Conceptualizing legitimacy: Measuring legitimating beliefs. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 354–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2009). Representative versus responsible government (MPIfG Working Paper 09/8) (pp. 1–19). Cologne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marien, S., & Hooghe, M. (2011). Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law compliance. European Journal of Political Research, 50, 267–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martini, S., & Quaranta, M. (2015). Finding out the hard way: Uncovering the structural foundations of political dissatisfaction in Italy, 1973–2013. West European Politics, 38(1), 28–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martini, S., & Quaranta, M. (2019). Political support among winners and losers: Within- and between-country effects of structure, process and performance in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 58(1), 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegata A., & Quaranta, M. (2018). Accountability through government alternation: Economic performance and the conditional role of political institutions in fifty countries, 1990–2015. International Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118755842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quaranta, M., & Martini, S. (2016). Does the economy really matter for satisfaction with democracy? Longitudinal and cross-country evidence from the European Union. Electoral Studies, 42, 164–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quaranta, M., & Martini, S. (2017). Easy come, easy go? Economic performance and satisfaction with democracy in Southern Europe in the last three decades. Social Indicators Research, 131, 659–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooduijn, M., van der Brug, W., & de Lange, S. L. (2016). Expressing or fuelling discontent? The relationship between populist voting and political discontent. Electoral Studies, 43, 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (2009). Creating political legitimacy: Electoral democracy versus quality of government. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torcal, M. (2017). Political trust in Western and Southern Europe. In S. Zmerli & T. W. G. van der Meer (Eds.), Handbook on Political Trust (pp. 418–439). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Ham, C., Thomassen, J., Aarts, K., & Andeweg, R. (Eds.). (2017). Myth and Reality of the Legitimacy Crisis: Explaining Trends and Cross-National Differences in Established Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Závecz, G. (2017). Post-communist societies of Central and Eastern Europe. In S. Zmerli & T. W. G. van der Meer (Eds.), Handbook on Political Trust (pp. 440–460). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Quaranta .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Martini, S., Quaranta, M. (2020). Changes and Political Support: What Is the Role of Context?. In: Citizens and Democracy in Europe. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21633-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics