Skip to main content

Gaps Over Time and Across Countries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Citizens and Democracy in Europe

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology ((PSEPS))

  • 351 Accesses

Abstract

The literature shows that political support is not distributed evenly among the population. There are individual characteristics that create ‘gaps’ in how citizens evaluate democracy and its institutions. Nevertheless, there has been little attention on how gaps in political support change over time and across countries in Europe. While previous research has paid broad attention to cross-national differences in the winner–loser gap, little has been done on the education gap, and even less on the employment status gap. In addition, analysis of how these three gaps change over time has been overlooked, leaving questions about the trends in them unanswered. This chapter provides an overview of the effects of education, employment and electoral status on political support, illustrating their variation across countries and over time in Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aarts, K., van Ham, C., & Thomassen, J. (2017). Modernization, globalization, and satisfaction with democracy. In C. van Ham, J. Thomassen, K. Aarts, & R. Andeweg (Eds.), Myth and Reality of the Legitimacy Crisis: Explaining Trends and Cross-National Differences in Established Democracies (pp. 37–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005). Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. J., & Guillory, C. A. (1997). Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 66–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. J., & Singer, M. M. (2008). The sensitive left and the impervious right: Multilevel models and the politics of inequality, ideology, and legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 564–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. J., & Tverdova, Y. V. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, B. (2015). Beyond ‘fixed versus random effects’: A framework for improving substantive and statistical analysis of panel, TSCS, and multilevel data. In R. J. Franzese (Ed.), Quantitative Research in Political Science. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P. C. (2018). Unemployment, trust in government, and satisfaction with democracy: An empirical investigation. Socius, 4, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A., & Jones, K. (2015). Explaining fixed effects: Random effects modeling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(1), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, J. E. (2015). The far-reaching impact of job loss and unemployment. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Y.-H., Bratton, M., Shastri, S., & Tessler, M. (2008). Public opinion and democratic legitimacy. Journal of Democracy, 19(1), 74–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. J. (2005). The social transformation of trust in government. International Review of Sociology, 15, 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy: Towards Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella, R., Haisken-De New, J., & MacCulloch, R. (2010). Happiness adaptation to income and to status in an individual panel. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76, 834–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doering, H., & Manow, P. (2018). Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies. Available at: http://parlgov.org.

  • Dogan, M. (2005). Erosion of confidence in thirty European democracies. Comparative Sociology, 4(1–2), 11–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotti Sani, G. M., & Magistro, B. (2016). Increasingly unequal? The economic crisis, social inequalities and trust in the European Parliament in 20 European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 246–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Social Survey. (2016a). European Social Survey Cumulative File, ESS 1–7 (2016). Data file edition 1.0. NSD—Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Social Survey. (2016b). ESS Round 8: European Social Survey Round 8 Data (2016). Data file edition 2.0. NSD—Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrother, M. (2014). Two multilevel modeling techniques for analyzing comparative longitudinal survey datasets. Political Science Research and Methods, 2(1), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hakhverdian, A., & Mayne, Q. (2012). Institutional trust, education, and corruption: A micro-macro interactive approach. Journal of Politics, 74, 739–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1999). Postmodernization, authority and democracy. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government (pp. 236–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laurence, J. (2015). (Dis)placing trust: The long-term effects of job displacement on generalised trust over the adult lifecourse. Social Science Research, 50, 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. W., Sandifer, R., & Stein, S. (1985). Effects of unemployment on mental and physical health. American Journal of Public Health, 75(5), 502–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martini, S., & Quaranta, M. (2019). Political support among winners and losers: Within- and between-country effects of structure, process and performance in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 58(1), 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayne, Q., & Hakhverdian, A. (2017). Education, socialization and political trust. In S. Zmerli & T. W. G. van der Meer (Eds.), Handbook on Political Trust (pp. 176–196). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, I. (1999). The economic performance of governments. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government (pp. 188–204). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morlino, L., & Montero, J. R. (1995). Legitimacy and democracy in Southern Europe. In R. Gunther, N. Diamandouros, & H.-J. Puhle (Eds.), The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective (pp. 315–377). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau, R., & Blais, A. (1993). Accepting the election outcome: The effect of participation on losers’ consent. British Journal of Political Science, 23, 553–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namkee, A., García, J. R., & Jimeno, J. F. (2004). The impact of unemployment on individual well-being in the EU (EconPapers Working Paper). FEDEA. Retrieved December 18, 2017, from https://ideas.repec.org/p/epr/enepwp/029.html.

  • Newton, K. (1999). Social and political trust in established democracies. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government (pp. 169–187). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K., & Norris, P. (2000). Confidence in public institutions: Faith, culture or performance? In S. J. Pharr & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? (pp. 52–73). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., Pharr, S. J., & Dalton, R. J. (2000). Introduction: What’s troubling the trilateral democracies? In S. J. Pharr & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? (pp. 4–23). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quaranta, M., & Martini, S. (2016). Does the economy really matter for satisfaction with democracy? Longitudinal and cross-country evidence from the European Union. Electoral Studies, 42, 164–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torcal, M. (2017). Political trust in Western and Southern Europe. In S. Zmerli & T. W. G. van der Meer (Eds.), Handbook on Political Trust (pp. 418–439). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer, T. W. G., & Hakhverdian, A. (2017). Political trust as the evaluation of process and performance: A cross-national study of forty-two European democracies. Political Studies, 65(1), 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ham, C., & Thomassen, J. (2017). The myth of legitimacy decline: An empirical evaluation of trends in political support in established democracies. In C. van Ham, J. Thomassen, K. Aarts, & R. Andeweg (Eds.), Myth and Reality of the Legitimacy Crisis: Explaining Trends and Cross-National Differences in Established Democracies (pp. 17–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zmerli, S., & Newton, K. (2011). Winners, losers and three types of trust. In M. Hooghe & S. Zmerli (Eds.), Political Trust: Why Context Matters (pp. 67–94). Essex: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Quaranta .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Martini, S., Quaranta, M. (2020). Gaps Over Time and Across Countries. In: Citizens and Democracy in Europe. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21633-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics