Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contextual Theories of Political Support

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Citizens and Democracy in Europe

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology ((PSEPS))

  • 384 Accesses

Abstract

The origins of support for democracy and its institutions are far from being clear. Cultural theories hypothesize that supportive attitudes originate from socialization processes, and, consequently, they are relatively stable over time. Modernization theories consider political support to develop outside of the political sphere, and they anticipate a decline as the result of a value change. Institutional and performance theories, in contrast, assume satisfaction and trust to be a reaction to the political context, which changes and varies across countries. This chapter follows the latter approaches, also developing conditional explanations. It distinguishes between input and output factors and focuses on the role of the institutional structure, the quality of process, economic performance and inequality in explaining cross-national and over time variation in support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aarts, K., & Thomassen, J. (2008). Satisfaction with democracy: Do institutions matter? Electoral Studies, 27(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aarts, K., van Ham, C., & Thomassen, J. (2017). Modernization, globalization, and satisfaction with democracy. In C. van Ham, J. Thomassen, K. Aarts, & R. Andeweg (Eds.), Myth and Reality of the Legitimacy Crisis: Explaining Trends and Cross-National Differences in Established Democracies (pp. 37–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. J. (1998). Parties, party systems, and satisfaction with democratic performance in the new Europe. Political Studies, 46(3), 572–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. J., & Guillory, C. A. (1997). Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 66–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. J., & Singer, M. M. (2008). The sensitive left and the impervious right: Multilevel models and the politics of inequality, ideology, and legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4e5), 564–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. J., & Tverdova, Y. V. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banducci, S. A., Donovan, T. M., & Karp, J. A. (1999). Proportional representation and attitudes about politics: Results from New Zealand. Electoral Studies, 18(4), 533–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1996). Determinants of democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 158–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellucci, P., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2011). A stable popularity function? Cross-national analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 50(2), 190–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellucci, P., & Memoli, V. (2012). The determinants of satisfaction with democracy in Europe. In D. Sanders, P. Magalhães, & G. Toka (Eds.), Citizens and the European Polity (pp. 9–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berggren, H. M., Fugate, A. G., Preuhs, R. R., & Still, D. R. (2004). Satisfied? Institutional determinants of citizen evaluations of democracy. Politics & Policy, 32(1), 72–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A., & Bodet, M. A. (2006). Does proportional representation foster closer congruence between citizens and policymakers? Comparative Political Studies, 39, 1243–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boix, C., & Stokes, S. (2003). Endogenous democratization. World Politics, 55, 517–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, R. E., Love, G. L., & Martínez-Gallardo, C. (2014). Cushioning the fall: Scandals, economic conditions, and executive approval. Political Behavior, 37(1), 109–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, P., & Torcal, M. (2017a). The effects of government system fractionalization on satisfaction with democracy. Political Science Research and Methods, 6(3), 593–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, P., & Torcal, M. (2017b). The political and economic causes of satisfaction with democracy in Spain—A twofold panel study. West European Politics, 40(6), 1241–1266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, H., Dutt, N., & Kornberg, A. (1993). The political economy of attitudes toward polity and society in Western European democracies. Journal of Politics, 55(4), 998–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curini, L., Jou, W., & Memoli, V. (2012). Satisfaction with democracy and the winner/loser debate: The role of policy preferences and past experience. British Journal of Political Science, 42, 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curini, L., Jou, W., & Memoli, V. (2015). Why Policy Representation Matters: The Consequences of Ideological Congruence Between Citizens and Their Governments. London, England: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, S., & Holmberg, S. (2014). Democracy and bureaucracy: How their quality matters for popular satisfaction. West European Politics, 37(3), 515–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, S., Linde, J., & Holmberg, S. (2013). Dissatisfied democrats: A matter of representation or performance? (QoG Working Paper 2013(8)). Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. J. (2008). The quantity and the quality of party systems: Party system polarization, its measurement, and its consequences. Comparative Political Studies, 41(7), 899–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, T., & Karp, J. (2017). Electoral rules, corruption, inequality and evaluations of democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 56(3), 469–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotti Sani, G. M., & Magistro, B. (2016). Increasingly unequal? The economic crisis, social inequalities and trust in the European parliament in 20 European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 246–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esaiasson, P., & Wlezien, C. (2017). Advances in the study of democratic responsiveness: An introduction. Comparative Political Studies, 50(6), 699–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezrow, L., & Xezonakis, G. (2011). Citizen satisfaction with democracy and parties’ policy offerings. Comparative Political Studies, 44, 1152–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, D. M., & Ian McAllister, I. (2006). Voter satisfaction and electoral systems: Does preferential voting in candidate-centred systems make a difference? European Journal of Political Research, 45(5), 723–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasiorowski, M. (1995). Economic crisis and political regime change: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 89, 882–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, B. (2008). What causes democratization? In C. Boix & S. C. Stokes (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics (pp. 317–339). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golder, M., & Ferland, B. (2018). Electoral systems and citizen-elite ideological congruence. In E. S. Herron, R. J. Pekkanen, & M. S. Shugart (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems (pp. 213–246). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmel, R., & Robertson, J. D. (1986). Government stability and regime support: A cross-national analysis. The Journal of Politics, 48(4), 1029–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, A., & Malhotra, N. (2013). Retrospective voting reconsidered. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92, 791–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., & Nasiritousi, N. (2009). Quality of government: What you get. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 135–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J. D., & Powell, G. B. (1994). Congruence between citizens and policymakers in two visions of liberal democracy. World Politics, 46, 291–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, J. A., & Bowler, S. (2001). Coalition government and satisfaction with democracy: An analysis of New Zealand’s reaction to proportional representation. European Journal of Political Research, 40(1), 57–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayser, M. A., & Peress, M. (2012). Benchmarking across borders: Electoral accountability and the necessity of comparison. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 661–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. (1992). Political culture: Residual category or general theory? Comparative Political Studies, 25, 362–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M., & Menasce Horowitz, J. (2006). Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 83–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Listhaug, O., Bernt, A., & Ingunn, O. E. (2009). Institutional variation and political support: An analysis of CSES data from 29 countries. In H.-D. Klingemann (Ed.), The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (pp. 311–332). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Listhaug, O., & Jakobsen, T. G. (2017). Foundations of political trust. In E. M. Uslaner (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marien, S. (2011a). Measuring political trust across time and space. In M. Hooghe & S. Zmerli (Eds.), Political Trust: Why Context Matters (pp. 13–46). Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marien, S. (2011b). The effect of electoral outcomes on political trust: A multi-level analysis of 23 countries. Electoral Studies, 30, 712–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martini, S., & Quaranta, M. (2015). Finding out the hard way: Uncovering the structural foundations of political dissatisfaction in Italy, 1973–2013. West European Politics, 38(1), 28–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayne Q., & Hackhverdian, A. (2016). Ideological congruence and citizen satisfaction: Evidence from 25 advanced democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 50(6), 822–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, I. (1999). The economic performance of governments. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government (pp. 188–203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M. D., & Budge, I. (2005). Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Medve-Bálint, G., & Boda, Z. (2014). The poorer you are, the more you trust? The effect of inequality and income on institutional trust in East-Central Europe. Czech Sociological Review, 50(3), 419–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. H., & Listhaug, O. (1998). Policy preferences and political distrust: A comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States. Scandinavian Political Studies, 21, 161–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morlino, L. (2011). Changes for Democracy: Actors, Structures, Processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (1999). Institutional explanations for political support. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government (pp. 217–235). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Obydenkova, A. V., & Arpino, B. (2018). Corruption and trust in the European Union and national institutions: Changes over the Great Recession across European states. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(3), 594–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, G. (2005). Why the rule of law matters. In L. Diamond & L. Morlino (Eds.), Assessing the Quality of Democracy (pp. 3–17). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77(1), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickup, M., & Evans, G. (2013). Addressing the endogeneity of economic evaluations in models of political choice. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(3), 735–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, B. G. (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. B. (2009). The ideological congruence controversy: The impact of alternative conceptualizations and data on the effects of election rules. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 1475–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quaranta, M., & Martini, S. (2016). Does the economy really matter for satisfaction with democracy? Longitudinal and cross-country evidence from the European Union. Electoral Studies, 42, 164–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quaranta, M., & Martini, S. (2017). Easy come, easy go? Economic performance and satisfaction with democracy in Southern Europe in the last three decades. Social Indicators Research, 131, 659–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reher, S. (2015). Explaining cross-national variation in the relationship between priority congruence and satisfaction with democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 54(1), 160–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrschneider, R., & Whitefield, S. (2007). Representation in new democracies: Party stances on European integration in post-communist Eastern Europe. Journal of Politics, 69, 1133–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roller, E. (2005). The Performance of Democracies: Political Institutions and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R., & Mishler, R. (2011). Political trust and distrust in post-authoritarian contexts. In S. Zmerli & M. Hooghe (Eds.), Political Trust: Why Context Matters (pp. 117–140). Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (2009). Creating political legitimacy: Electoral democracy versus quality of government. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (2011). The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust and Inequality in International Perspective. London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. M. (2013). The global financial crisis and domestic political agenda. Electoral Studies, 32(3), 404–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien, C. (2010). Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. T., & Duch, R. (2013). The meaning and use of subjective perceptions in studies of economic voting. Electoral Studies, 32(2), 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen, J. (1995). Support for democratic values. In H.-D. Klingemann & D. Fuchs (Eds.), Citizens and the State (pp. 383–416). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen, J. (2014). Representation and accountability. In J. Thomassen (Ed.), Elections and Democracy (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Torcal, M. (2017). Political trust in Western and Southern Europe. In S. Zmerli & T. W. G. van der Meer (Eds.), Handbook on Political Trust (pp. 418–439). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M. (2011). Corruption, the inequality trap, and trust in government. In S. Zmerli & M. Hooghe (Eds.), Political Trust: Why Context Matters (pp. 141–162). Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer, T. W. G. (2010). In what we trust? A multi-level study into trust in parliament as an evaluation of state characteristics. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(3), 517–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer, T. W. G. (2018). Economic performance and political trust. In E. M. Uslaner (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190274801.013.16.

  • van der Meer, T. W. G., & Hakhverdian, A. (2017). Political trust as the evaluation of process and performance: A cross-national study of forty-two European democracies. Political Studies, 65(1), 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Deth, J. W., & Scarborough, E. (1995). The Impact of Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Erkel, P. E., & van der Meer, T. W. G. (2016). Macroeconomic performance, political trust and the great recession: A multilevel analysis of the effects of within-country fluctuations in macroeconomic performance on political trust in 15 EU countries, 1999–2011. European Journal of Political Research, 55(1), 177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, A. F., Schneider, F., & Halla, M. (2009). The quality of institutions and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe—A panel analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 25(1), 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, D. D. (1989). The sources and structure of legitimation in Western democracies: A consolidated model tested with time-series data in six countries since World War II. American Sociological Review, 54(5), 682–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zmerli, S., & Hooghe, M. (Eds.). (2011). Political Trust: Why Context Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social, Political and Cognitive Sciences, Università di Siena, Siena, Italy

    Sergio Martini

  2. Department of Sociology and Social Research, Università di Trento, Trento, Italy

    Mario Quaranta

Authors
  1. Sergio Martini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mario Quaranta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Quaranta .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Martini, S., Quaranta, M. (2020). Contextual Theories of Political Support. In: Citizens and Democracy in Europe. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21633-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation