Abstract
This chapter illustrates the goals and the research questions of this book, its theoretical framework and the empirical strategy. The volume aims to explain changes and cross-national differences in political support, understood as citizens’ evaluations of democracy and its main representative institutions, using countries’ contextual characteristics related to the inputs of the political system—the institutional format and its mechanics—and its outputs—the quality of the process, economic performance and economic redistribution. Moreover, it emphasizes the importance of citizens’ social and political characteristics in producing gaps in satisfaction with democracy and trust in institutions. Finally, the volume explores how micro- and macro-level factors are intertwined and linked to political support over time and across countries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Anderson, C. J. (2007). The interaction of structures and voter behavior. In R. J. Dalton & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (pp. 589–609). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005). Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, C. J., & Singer, M. M. (2008). The sensitive left and the impervious right: Multilevel models and the politics of inequality, ideology and legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 564–599.
Armingeon, K., & Guthmann, K. (2014). Democracy in crisis? The declining support for national democracy in European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 53(3), 423–442.
Bartels, B. (2015). Beyond ‘fixed versus random effects’: A framework for improving substantive and statistical analysis of panel, TSCS, and multilevel data. In R. J. Franzese (Ed.), Quantitative Research in Political Science. London: Sage.
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647.
Bellucci, P., Costa Lobo, M., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2012). Economic crisis and elections: The European periphery. Electoral Studies, 31(3), 469–471.
Brittan, S. (1975). The economic contradictions of democracy. British Journal of Political Science, 5, 129–159.
Crozier, M. J., Huntington, S. P., & Watanuki, J. (1975). The Crisis of Democracy. Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York: New York University Press.
Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dalton, R. J. (2005). The social transformation of trust in government. International Review of Sociology, 15(1), 133–154.
Dalton, R. J. (2008). The quantity and the quality of party systems: Party system polarization, its measurement and its consequences. Comparative Political Studies, 41(7), 899–920.
Dalton, R. J., & Anderson, C. J. (2011). Citizens, Context, and Choice: How Context Shapes Citizens’ Electoral Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457.
Ezrow, L., & Xezonakis, G. (2011). Citizen satisfaction with democracy and parties’ policy offerings. Comparative Political Studies, 44, 1152–1178.
Fairbrother, M. (2014). Two multilevel modeling techniques for analyzing comparative longitudinal survey datasets. Political Science Research and Methods, 2(1), 119–140.
Flesher Fominaya, C. (2017). European anti-austerity and pro-democracy protests in the wake of the global financial crisis. Social Movement Studies, 16(1), 1–20.
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hakhverdian, A., & Mayne, Q. (2012). Institutional trust, education, and corruption: A micro-macro interactive approach. Journal of Politics, 74(3), 739–750.
Hay, C. (2007). Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92(4), 791–808.
Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kaase, M., & Newton, K. (1995). Beliefs in Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klingemann, H.-D. (1999). Mapping political support in the 1990s: A global analysis. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government (pp. 31–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kriesi, H., & Pappas, T. S. (2015). European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolenzal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frei, T. (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475–507.
Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. D., & Popkin, S. L. (Eds.). (2000). Elements of Reason: Cognitive, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martini, S., & Quaranta, M. (2015). Finding out the hard way: Uncovering the structural foundations of political dissatisfaction in Italy, 1973–2013. West European Politics, 38(1), 28–52.
Martini, S., & Quaranta, M. (2019). Political support among winners and losers: Within- and between-country effects of structure, process and performance in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 58(1), 341–361.
Mayne, Q., & Hakhverdian, A. (2016). Ideological congruence and citizen satisfaction: Evidence from 25 advanced democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 50(6), 822–849.
McAllister, I. (1999). The economic performance of governments. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government (pp. 188–203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30–62.
Morlino, L. (2011). Changes for Democracy: Actors, Structures, Processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nadeau, R., & Blais, A. (1993). Accepting the election outcome: The effect of participation on losers’ consent. British Journal of Political Science, 23(4), 553–563.
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Offe, C., & Keane, J. (Eds.). (1984). Contradictions of the Welfare State. London: Hutchinson.
Powell, B. G. (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Quaranta, M., & Martini, S. (2016). Does the economy really matter for satisfaction with democracy? Longitudinal and cross-country evidence from the European Union. Electoral Studies, 42, 164–174.
Quaranta, M., & Martini, S. (2017). Easy come, easy go? Economic performance and satisfaction with democracy in Southern Europe in the last three decades. Social Indicators Research, 131, 659–680.
Roller, E. (2005). The Performance of Democracies: Political Institutions and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rothstein, B. (2009). Creating political legitimacy: Electoral democracy versus quality of government. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 311–330.
Runciman, D. (2013). The Confidence Trap. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sears, D. O., & Brown, C. (2013). Childhood and adult political development. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (pp. 59–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.
Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomassen, J. J. (1995). Support for democratic values. In H.-D. Klingemann & D. Fuchs (Eds.), Citizens and the State (pp. 383–416). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thomassen, J. J. (2015). What’s gone wrong with democracy, or with theories explaining why it has? In T. Poguntke, S. Rostutscher, R. Schmitt-Beck, & S. Zmerli (Eds.), Citizenship and Democracy in an Era of Crisis (pp. 34–52). London: Routledge.
van de Walle, S., van de Roosbroeck, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2008). Trust in the public sector: Is there any evidence for a long-term decline? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(1), 47–64.
van der Meer, T. M. G. (2017). Political trust and the ‘crisis of democracy’. In W. R. Thompson (Ed.), Oxford Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.7.
van der Meer, T. M. G., & Zmerli, S. (2017). The deeply rooted concern with political trust. In S. Zmerli & T. W. G. van der Meer (Eds.), Handbook on Political Trust (pp. 1–15). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
van Erkel, P. E., & van der Meer, T. W. G. (2016). Macroeconomic performance, political trust and the great recession: A multilevel analysis of the effects of within-country fluctuations in macroeconomic performance on political trust in 15 EU countries, 1999–2011. European Journal of Political Research, 55(1), 177–197.
van Ham, C., Thomassen, J., Aarts, K., & Andeweg, R. (Eds.). (2017). Myth and Reality of the Legitimacy Crisis: Explaining Trends and Cross-National Differences in Established Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Kessel, S. (2015). Populist Parties in Europe Agents of Discontent? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Weatherford, M. S. (1992). Measuring political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 86(1), 149–166.
Zmerli, S., & Hooghe, M. S. (Eds.). (2011). Political Trust: Why Context Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press.
Zmerli, S., & Newton, K. (2011). Winners, losers and three types of trust. In M. Hooghe & S. Zmerli (Eds.), Political Trust: Why Context Matters (pp. 67–94). Essex: ECPR Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martini, S., Quaranta, M. (2020). Political Support in Flux. In: Citizens and Democracy in Europe. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21633-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21633-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21632-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21633-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)