Skip to main content

The European Union: Integration, Institutions and External Relations in a Globalised and Regionalised World

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Changing Global Order

Part of the book series: United Nations University Series on Regionalism ((UNSR,volume 17))

  • 1885 Accesses

Abstract

An important aspect of the EU’s external affairs is ‘interregionalism’. As this chapter demonstrates, the EU’s interregional approach has gradually achieved an important position in European integration and in EU foreign policy. It serves to enhance peaceful and cooperative relations of the EU with other world regions, while strengthening support for its core values, norms and economic interests. The chapter provides an overview of the scholarly research on interregionalism and its relation to foreign policy analysis and studies of global affairs. The chapter also provides an overview of main rationales for EU-driven interregionalism, its current forms and outreach and its strategic significance within current EU foreign policy aims as incorporated in the 2016 Global Strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more information on the history of the EC and the EU’s external relations, e.g. see Dinan (1999).

  2. 2.

    Respective information can be found at http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ [Accessed 17 January 2018].

  3. 3.

    With such agreements, the EU also aims to spread its values and beliefs on human rights and democratic governance, economic liberalization and privatization, acting as a ‘norm entrepreneur’. For an overview of all respective agreements: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/policies/agreements?lang=en [Accessed 1 April 2018].

  4. 4.

    For more on EU-Africa relations, e.g., see Farrell (2005); on EU-Asia relations, e.g., see Gilson (2005). On EU-Latin America relations, see García (2014).

Further Readings

  • Keukeleire, S., & Delreux, T. (2014). The foreign policy of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 408p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F., & Van Langenhove, L. (2005). The EU as a global actor and the role of interregionalism. London: Routledge, 262p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telò, M., Fawcett, L., & Ponjaert, F. (2015). Interregionalism and the EU. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Aggestam, L. (2008). Introduction: Ethical power Europe? International Affairs, 84(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, V. K., & Fogarty, E. A. (2005). The limits of interregionalism: The EU and North America. Journal of European Integration, 27(3), 327–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, V., & Fogarty, E. (2006). The limits of Interregionalism: The EU and North America. In Söderbaum & V. Langenhove (Eds.), The EU as a global power: The politics of interregionalism (pp. 79–99). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allahverdiyev, V. (2008). Interregionalism as a foreign policy tool of the EU: The cases of ASEM and EU-ASEAN partnership. Master thesis, Central European University, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, F., Scaramagli, T., & SöDerbaum, F. (Eds.) (2014). Intersecting interregionalism. Regions, global governance, and the EU. Dordrecht/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blavoukos, S., & Bourantonis, D. (2017). The EU in UN politics actors, processes and performances. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, C., & Vogler, J. (1999). The European Union as a Global Actor. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, C., & Vogler, J. (2006). Conceptualizing actors and actorness. The European Union as a Global Actor, 2, 12–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove-Sacks, C., & Twitchett, K. J. (Eds.). (1970). The new international actors: The United Nations and the European economic community. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damro, C. (2012). Market power Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(5), 682–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Flers, N. A., & Regelsberger, E. (2005). The EU and inter-regional cooperation. In C. Hill & M. Smith (Eds.), International relations and the European Union (pp. 317–347). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinan, D. (1999). Ever closer union: An introduction to European integration. Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, M. (2011). The European Union and interregionalism: Patterns of engagement. Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drieskens, E. (2017). Golden or gilded jubilee? A research agenda for actorness. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(10), 1534–1546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEAS. (2016). Shared vision, common action: A stronger Europe, a global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council. (2000). Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs. Brussels: Publications of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. (2005). A triumph of realism over idealism? Cooperation between the European Union and Africa. Journal of European Integratio, 27(3), 263–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaens, B. (2012). The rise of interregionalisms: “The case of the European Union’s relations with East Asia”. In The Ashgate research companion to regionalisms (pp. 69–91). Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, M. (2014). The European Union and Latin America: ‘Transformative power Europe’ versus the realities of economic interests. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 28(4), 621–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, J. (2005). New interregionalism? The EU and East Asia. European Integration, 27(3), 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Strategy. (2016). Shared vision, common action. A dtronger Europe: A global strategy for the European union’s foreign and security policy. June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hänggi, H., Roloff, R., & Rüland, J. (Eds.). (2006). Interregionalism and international relations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardacre, A., & Smith, M. (2009). The EU and the diplomacy of complex Interregionalism. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 4(2), 167–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, X. (2014). European Union representation at the United Nations: Towards more coherence after the Treaty of Lisbon. PhD dissertation, Leiden University, 202p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, X., & Hosli, M. O. (2013). Pre- and post-Lisbon: European Union voting in the United Nations general assembly. West European Politics, 36(6), 1274–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jupille, J., & Caporaso, J. A. (1998). States, agency, and rules: The European Union in global environmental politics. The European Union in the world community, 17, 157–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keukeleire, S., & Delreux, T. (2014). The foreign policy of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuleers, F., Fonck, D., & Keukeleire, S. (2016). Beyond EU navel-gazing: Taking stock of EU-centrism in the analysis of EU foreign policy. Cooperation and Conflict, 51(3), 345–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koops, J. A. (2011). The European Union as an integrative power: Assessing the EU’s’ effective multilateralism’ with NATO and the United Nations (Vol. 16). Brussels: ASP/VUB Press/UPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koops, J., & Macaj, G. (Eds.). (2014). The European Union as a diplomatic actor. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koops, J., & Macaj, G. (Eds.). (2015). The European Union as a diplomatic actor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M. (2005). Europe’s transformative power. CER Bulletin, 40, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. (2002). Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, H. (2008). The long legacy of Dorian Gray: Why the European Union needs to redefine its role in global affairs. Journal of European Integration, 30, 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemann, A., & Bretherton, C. (2013). EU external policy at the crossroads: The challenge of actorness and effectiveness. International Relations, 27(3), 261–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rüland, J. (2001). ASEAN and the European union: A bumpy inter-regional relation, Bonn, Zentrum für Europaeische Integrationsforschung (ZEI), Discussion Paper C95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüland, J. (2006). Interregionalism: An unfinished agenda. In H. Hänggi, R. Roloff, & J. Rüland (Eds.), Interregionalism and international relations (pp. 295–313). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalz, U. (2005). Die Entwicklung der Europäischen Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik 1990–2004. In J. Varwick (Ed.), Die Beziehungen zwischen NATO und EU. Partnerschaft, Konkurrenz, Rivalität? (pp. 45–59). Opladen: Budrich-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, T. M., & Cornelissen, S. (2012). The Ashgate research companion to regionalisms. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöstedt, G. (1977). The external role of the European Community (Vol. 7). Gower Publishing Company, Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (2004). Between two worlds? The European Union, the United States and world order. International Politics, 41(1), 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F., & Van Langenhove, L. (2005). The EU as a global actor and the role of interregionalism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F., Stålgren, P., & Van Langenhove, L. (2005). The EU as a global actor and the dynamics of Interregionalism: A comparative analysis. European Integration, 27(3), 342–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F., Stålgren, P., & Van Langenhove, L. (2006). The EU as a global player: The politics of interregionalism. London/New York: Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telò, M. (2005). Europe: A Civilan power? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telò, M., Fawcett, L., & Ponjaert, F. (2015). Interregionalism and the European Union: A post-revisionist approach to Europe’s place in a changing world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Langenhove, L. (2011). Building regions: The regionalization of world order. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhofstadt, G. (2008). The financial crisis: Three ways out for Europe. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 12p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zepter, B. (2008). Reflections on regionalization in Europe: Lessons for Asia? Asia Europe Journal, 5, 455–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madeleine O. Hosli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Selleslaghs, J., Telò, M., Hosli, M.O. (2020). The European Union: Integration, Institutions and External Relations in a Globalised and Regionalised World. In: Hosli, M.O., Selleslaghs, J. (eds) The Changing Global Order. United Nations University Series on Regionalism, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21603-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics