Skip to main content

Russia in the Changing Global Order: Multipolarity, Multilateralism, and Sovereignty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Changing Global Order

Part of the book series: United Nations University Series on Regionalism ((UNSR,volume 17))

  • 1971 Accesses

Abstract

With a reference to Russia’s size and location, its unique history and culture, and its massive economic and military resources Russia claims a prominent role in the current world order. The foreign policy strategy which Russia’s post-communist leadership developed from this worldview, has generally been pragmatic and re-active. More recently, partly due to developments beyond Russia’s influence and partially as a result of political and economic changes in Russia itself, the country’s foreign policies have become more self-confident, more assertive and more offensive, initially especially in its own environment but later also beyond its sphere of influence. Russia is a revisionist power, but with a strongly conservative streak. Multipolarity is Russia’s major foreign policy ambition, one that is based on competition and cooperation among sovereign great powers. Russia demands the right to be included, but it also wants to stand apart. Russia is strongly in favour of multilateralism, but preferably a multilateralism for the few, Russia included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The BRICs notion was coined by Jim O’Neill (2001), Goldman Sachs. It refered to what he saw as the four major emerging market economies: Brazil, Russia, India, and China. The idea of BRICs became increasingly politicized, which was also the major reason why in 2010 the Republic of South Africa ‘joined’ this loose association of states, which from then on was known as BRICS.

  2. 2.

    At the time of writing reports about Russia’s interference in the presidential elections in the United States are still too indeterminate to draw conclusions on the extent of involvement of the Russian leadership or on the strategic nature of the intervention.

  3. 3.

    The inspiration to compare the Eurasian Union with the European Economic Community comes from Blockmans, Kostanyan and Vorobiov 2012, who also give the figures on Germany. The figures for the countries of the Eurasian Union come from different web sources, including the World Bank.

Further Reading

  • Russian foreign policy is the topic of a dazzling number of academic and policy-related studies. The interested reader may begin with the series of brilliant essays in Russian Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century and the Shadow of the Past, edited by Robert Legvold (2007). The book offers fascinating insights into the longer-term, historical continuities of Russian foreign policy. Robert Donaldson, Joseph Nogee and Vidya Nadkarni (2014, fifth edition) present a well-structured, balanced and chronological overview of Russia’s international policies in The Foreign Policy of Russia. Changing Systems, Enduring Interests. The best study of Putin’s foreign policies is Russia and the New World Disorder by Bobo Lo (2015). The book is topical, thorough and admirably objective.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Adomeit, H. (2007). Inside or outside? Russia’s policies towards NATO. Paper delivered to the annual conference of the Centre for Russian Studies at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) on “The Multilateral Dimension in Russian Foreign Policy”, Oslo, October 12–13, Revised December 20, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberts, Hannah Claire (2016). Russia’s OSCE policy and the Ukraine crisis: Renewed interest, enduring approach. Thesis master of global policy studies and master of arts. Austin: The University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, R. (2004). Regionalism, regional structures and security Management in Central Asia. International Affairs, 80(3), 463–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, R. (2013). Russia and Syria: Explaining alignment with a regime in crisis. International Affairs, 89(4), 795–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (2005). Power in international Politics. International Organization, 59(1), 39–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blockmans, S., Kostanyan, H., & Vorobiov, I. (2012). Towards a Eurasian economic union: The challenge of integration and unity. Brussels: CEPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, I. (2015). Russia in international organizations: The shift from defence to offence. In D. Cadier & M. Light (Eds.), Russia’s foreign policy. Ideas, domestic politics and external relations (pp. 189–203). Houndmills/Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. (2009). Russia’s trade relations within the commonwealth of independent states. In E. W. Rowe & S. Torjesen (Eds.), The multilateral dimension in Russian foreign policy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, R. H., Nogee, J. L., & Nadkarni, V. (2014). The foreign policy of Russia. Changing systems, enduring interests. In Armonk. New York/London: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragneva, R. (2016). The Eurasian economic union: Balancing sovereignty and integration. Institute of European Law. Working Paper 10. University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. Medvedev on Russia’s interest. http://www.economist.com/blogs/certainideasofeurope/2008/09/medvedev_on_russias_interests

  • Ferdinand, P. (2013). The positions of Russia and China at the UN Security Council in the light of recent crises. European Parliament/Directorate-General for External Policies. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation. (2008). http://en.kremlin.ru/supplement/4116

  • The Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation. (2016). http://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/official_documents//asset_publisher/CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/2542248

  • Gerrits, A., & Bader, M. (2015). Russian patronage over Abkhazia and South Ossetia: Implications for conflict resolution. East European Politics, 32(3), 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedetoft, U., & Blum, D. W. (2008). Introduction: Russia and globalization—A historical and conceptual framework. In D. W. Blum (Ed.), Russia and globalization. Identity, security, and society in an era of change. Washington, DC/Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center Press/The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, I. (2011). International organizations. Politics, law, practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropatcheva, E. (2016). Russia and the collective security treaty organisation: Multilateral policy or unilateral ambitions? Europe-Asia Studies, 68(9), 1526–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuchins, A. C., & Zevelev, I. A. (2012). Russian foreign policy: Continuity in change. The Washington Quarterly, 35(1), 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurlantzick, J. (2016). State capitalism. How the return of Statism is transforming the world. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, D. W., & Shevchenko, A. (2010). Status seekers. Chinese and Russian responses to U.S. primacy. International Security, 34(4), 63–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, D. W., & Shevchenko, A. (2014). Russia says no: Power, status and emotions in foreign policy. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 47, 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laruelle, M. (2010). In the name of the nation. Nationalism and Politics in contemporary Russia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legvold, R. (2009). The role of multilateralism in Russian foreign policy approaches. In E. W. Rowe & S. Torjesen (Eds.), The multilateral dimension in Russian foreign policy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism. Hybrid regimes after the cold war. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lieven, A. (1999). The weakness of Russian nationalism. Survival, 41(2), 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, B. (2015). Russia and the new world disorder. London/Washington, DC: Chatham House/Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, S. N. (2006). The ‘R’ in BRICs: Is Russia an emerging power? International Affairs, 82(1), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makarychev, A., & Morozov, V. (2011). Multilateralism, multipolarity, and beyond: A menu of Russia’s policy strategies’. Global Governance, 17, 353–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazower, M. (2013). Governing the world. The history of an idea. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. (1990). Back to the future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security, 15(1), 5–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, John (1994/95). The false promise of international institutions. International Security 19(3), 5–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Security Concept of the Russian Federation. (2000). http://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/official_documents//asset_publisher/CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/589768

  • O’Neill, J. (2001). Building better economic BRICs. Global Economics Paper No: 66. New York, etc., Goldman Sachs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C. (2016). The Battle for Syria. International Rivalry in the New Middle East. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prozorov, S. (2006). Understanding conflict between Russia and the EU. The limits of integration. Houndmills/Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putin, V. (2012, February). Russia and the changing world. Moskovskiye Novosti February 27, 2012. Johnson’s Russia List, 2012, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putin, V. (2013, September). Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club, 19 September. Retrieved from http://eng.kremlin.ru/news/6007

  • Putin, V. (2014a, May). Putin: Peredacha polnomochnyi v EAEU ne osnachayet utratu suverenita. https://ria.ru/economy/20140529/1009842639.html

  • Putin, V. (2014b, July). Security council meeting. Vladimir Putin chaired a security council meeting in the Kremlin. Retrieved from http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/46305

  • Riasanovsky, N. V. (2005). Russian identities. A historical survey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, E. W., & Torjesen, S. (2009). Key features of Russian multilateralism. In E. W. Rowe & S. Torjesen (Eds.), The multilateral dimension in Russian foreign policy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakwa, R. (2016). How the Eurasian elites envisage the role of the EEU in global perspective. European Politics and Society, 17(1), 4–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sergunin, A. A. (2004). Discussions of international relations in post-communist Russia. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 37, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherr, J. (2013). Hard diplomacy and soft coercion. Russia’s influence abroad. London: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevtsova, L. (2010). Lonely power. Why Russia has failed to become the west and the west is Weary of Russia. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J. (2000). From voting to violence. Democratization and nationalist conflict. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torjesen, S. (2009). Russia as a military great power: The uses of the CSTO and the CSO in Central Asia. In E. W. Rowe & S. Torjesen (Eds.), The multilateral dimension in Russian foreign policy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsygankov, A. P. (2012). Russia and the west from Alexander to Putin. Honor in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsygankov, A. P., & Tsygankov, P. A. (2003). New directions in Russian international studies: Pluralization, westernization, and isolationism. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 37, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2015). Gross domestic product 2015. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GDP.xls

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Gerrits .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gerrits, A. (2020). Russia in the Changing Global Order: Multipolarity, Multilateralism, and Sovereignty. In: Hosli, M.O., Selleslaghs, J. (eds) The Changing Global Order. United Nations University Series on Regionalism, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21603-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics