Skip to main content

Surgical Management of Fossa Navicularis and Distal Urethral Strictures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1941 Accesses

Abstract

The management of Fossa Navicularis and distal urethral strictures remain a challenge for both reconstructive and general urologists. This is due to their location in the urethra, the risks of dehiscence, adverse cosmetic outcomes, fistula formation and most importantly stricture recurrence. With the advances in urethral reconstruction in the last few decades, various techniques can be utilized for the treatment of fossa navicularis and distal urethral strictures. These different techniques include: multi-staged and single staged procedures with the use of fasciocutaneous flaps, buccal mucosal grafts or a combination of both which could be performed through either open or transurethral approaches. Treatment modalities are trending towards single-staged repairs with grafts rather than multi-staged repairs with local skin flaps. The goal of this chapter is to describe the diagnosis and management of fossa navicularis and distal urethral strictures with the advantages and pitfalls of the different techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Belsante MJ, Selph JP, Peterson AC. The contemporary management of urethral strictures in men resulting from lichen sclerosus. Transl Androl Urol. 2015;4(1):22–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fenton AS, Morey AF, Aviles R, Garcia CR. Anterior urethral strictures: etiology and characteristics. Urology. 2005;65(6):1055–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chowdhury PS, Nayak P, Mallick S, Gurumurthy S, David D, Mossadeq A. Single stage ventral onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for navicular fossa strictures. Indian J Urol. 2014;30(1):17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dielubanza EJ, Han JS, Gonzalez CM. Distal urethroplasty for fossa navicularis and meatal strictures. Transl Androl Uro. 2014;3(2):163–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Navalon Verdejo P, Pallas Costa Y, Juan Escudero J, Fabuel Deltoro M, Ordono Dominguez F, Monllor Peidro E, et al. [Dorsal meatoplasty for the treatment of meatal stenosis in patients with balanitis xerotica obliterans]. Archivos Espanoles de Urologia. 2007;60(10):1 156–1 60.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kluth LA, Ernst L, Vetterlein MW, Meyer CP, Reiss CP, Fisch M, et al. Direct vision internal urethrotomy for short anterior urethral strictures and beyond: success rates, predictors of treatment failure, and recurrence management. Urology. 2017;106:210–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Veeratterapillay R, Pickard RS. Long-term effect of urethral dilatation and internal urethrotomy for urethral strictures. Curr Opin Urol. 2012;22(6):467–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh SK, Agrawal SK, Mavuduru RS. Management of the stricture of fossa navicularis and pendulous urethral strictures. Indian J Urol. 2011;27(3):371–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sachse H. Cystoscopic transurethral incision of urethral stricture with a sharp instrument (author’s transl). MMW Munch Med Wochenschr. 1974;116(49):2147–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sachse H. Treatment of urethral stricture: transurethral slit in view using sharp section. Fortschr Med. 1974;92(1):12–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pansadoro V, Emiliozzi P. Internal urethrotomy in the management of anterior urethral strictures: long-term followup. J Urol. 1996;156(1):73–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heyns CF, Steenkamp JW, De Kock ML, Whitaker P. Treatment of male urethral strictures: is repeated dilation or internal urethrotomy useful? J Urol. 1998;160(2):356–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Steenkamp JW, Heyns CF, de Kock ML. Internal urethrotomy versus dilation as treatment for male urethral strictures: a prospective, randomized comparison. J Urol. 1997;157(1):98–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Meeks JJ, Barbagli G, Mehdiratta N, Granieri MA, Gonzalez CM. Distal urethroplasty for isolated fossa navicularis and meatal strictures. BJU Int. 2012;109(4):616–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Morey AF, Lin HC, DeRosa CA, Griffith BC. Fossa navicularis reconstruction: impact of stricture length on outcomes and assessment of extended meatotomy (first stage Johanson) maneuver. J Urol. 2007;177(1):184–7; discussion 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Malone P. A new technique for meatal stenosis in patients with lichen sclerosus. J Urol. 2004;172(3):949–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Palmer DA, Marcello PW, Zinman LN, Vanni AJ. Urethral reconstruction with rectal mucosa graft onlay: a novel, minimally invasive technique. J Urol. 2016;196(3):782–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Barbagli G, Akbarov I, Heidenreich A, Zugor V, Olianas R, Aragona M, et al. Anterior urethroplasty using a new tissue engineered oral mucosa graft: surgical techniques and outcomes. J Urol. 2018;200(2):448–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wisenbaugh ES, Gelman J. The use of flaps and grafts in the treatment of urethral stricture disease. Adv Urol. 2015;2015:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cohney BC. A penile flap procedure for the relief of meatal stricture. Br J Urol. 1963;35:182–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Blandy JP, Tresidder GC. Meatoplasty. Br J Urol. 1967;39(5):633–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Brannen GE. Meatal reconstruction. J Urol. 1976;116(3):319–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. De Sy WA, Oosterlinck W, Verbaeys A. European experience with 1-stage urethroplasty with free full thickness skin graft. J Urol. 1981;125(4):502–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jordan GH. Reconstruction of the fossa navicularis. J Urol. 1987;138(1):102–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Virasoro R, Eltahawy EA, Jordan GH. Long-term follow-up for reconstruction of strictures of the fossa navicularis with a single technique. BJU Int. 2007;100(5):1143–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Venn SN, Mundy AR. Early experience with the use of buccal mucosa for substitution urethroplasty. Br J Urol. 1998;81(5):738–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Venn SN, Mundy AR. Urethroplasty for balanitis xerotica obliterans. Br J Urol. 1998;81(5):735–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Holland AJ, Smith GH, Ross FI, Cass DT. HOSE: an objective scoring system for evaluating the results of hypospadias surgery. BJU Int. 2001;88(3):255–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Armenakas NA, McAninch JW. Management of fossa navicularis strictures. Urol Clin North Am. 2002;29(2):477–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Armenakas NA, Morey AF, McAninch JW. Reconstruction of resistant strictures of the fossa navicularis and meatus. J Urol. 1998;160(2):359–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gelman J, Sohn W. 1-stage repair of obliterative distal urethral strictures with buccal graft urethral plate reconstruction and simultaneous onlay penile skin flap. J Urol. 2011;186(3):935–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Goel A, Goel A, Dalela D, Sankhwar SN. Meatoplasty using double buccal mucosal graft technique. Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41(4):885–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Onol SY, Onol FF, Gumus E, Topaktas R, Erdem MR. Reconstruction of distal urethral strictures confined to the glans with circular buccal mucosa graft. Urology. 2012;79(5):1158–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Onol SY, Onol FF, Onur S, Inal H, Akbas A, Kose O. Reconstruction of strictures of the fossa navicularis and meatus with transverse island fasciocutaneous penile flap. J Urol. 2008;179(4):1437–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nikolavsky D, Abouelleil M, Daneshvar M. Transurethral ventral buccal mucosa graft inlay urethroplasty for reconstruction of fossa navicularis and distal urethral strictures: surgical technique and preliminary results. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48(11):1823–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Naude JH. Endoscopic skin-graft urethroplasty. World J Urol. 1998;16(3):171–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Daneshvar M, Blakely S, Angulo J, Simhan J, Lucas J, Hunter C, et al. PD21-02 initial multi-institutional experience of incisionless buccal mucosa graft inlay for distal urethral strictures. J Urol. 2018;199(4):e468.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Daneshvar, M., Pinkhasov, A.M., Nikolavsky, D. (2020). Surgical Management of Fossa Navicularis and Distal Urethral Strictures. In: Martins, F.E., Kulkarni, S.B., Köhler, T.S. (eds) Textbook of Male Genitourethral Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21447-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21447-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21446-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21447-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics