Skip to main content

Embedding Corporate Social Responsibility into Business Practice: Lessons Learned from New Zealand

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

The chapter contributes to the understanding of the changing role of business in society within a New Zealand context. Academics in management and organisation widely share the assumption that the task of government is to provide their respective society’s public goods, while the business of the business community is to do business—with shareholder primacy being central to free enterprise. However, this trend is changing and many companies have started to embed reporting initiatives, and social and environmental responsibilities that go beyond the minimum legal requirements of corporate governance and what is viewed as corporate social responsibility (CSR). In recent years, the importance of the notion of CSR is rising in New Zealand, however, we still have limited understanding of whether it is embedded into ultimate objectives of businesses. The New Zealand government has aspired to be the first country which is well and truly sustainable, a goal suggested by the former Prime Minister Helen Clark in 2006. As the country is one of the least corrupt countries in the world; the new Code of Corporate Governance launched in October 2017; and, growing demands from investors a change for a better and more complete CSR environment appears to be underway. This chapter takes into account the evolution of CSR in New Zealand. The chapter explains environmental laws; identifies the socio-economic factors that influence CSR; the initiatives to promote CSR; CSR practices of New Zealand business; and, CSR education in the major universities. We postulate that in order to better understand CSR in a nation state, it is important to learn of the underlying peculiarities of the institutional environment in that country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACCSR. (2017). Annual review of the state of CSR 2017. Retrieved from http://accsr.com.au/business-supports-mandatory-sustainability-reporting-says-new-csr-survey/

  • Amran, A., & Haniffa, R. (2011). Evidence in development of sustainability reporting: A case of a developing country. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(3), 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility. (2014). The 10th year: Progress and prospects for CSR in Australia and New Zealand. Retrieved from http://accsr.com.au/what-we-do/csr-resources/csr-research/

  • Australian Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility. (2016). Pathways to the sustainable development goals. Retrieved from http://accsr.com.au/what-we-do/csr-resources/csr-research/

  • Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrena Martínez, J., López Fernández, M., & Romero Fernández, P. M. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution through institutional and stakeholder perspectives. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 25(1), 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, J., Higgins, C., & Frame, B. (2009). Initiating sustainable development reporting: Evidence from New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(4), 588–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bondy, K., Moon, J., & Matten, D. (2012). An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York, NY: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M. C., & Delgado, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility education and research in Portuguese business schools. In D. Turker, C. Altuntas, & S. O. Idowu (Eds.), Social responsibility education across Europe: A comparative approach (pp. 207–227). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (2006). Institutional analysis and the paradox of corporate social responsibility. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 925–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie, A. (1906). The gospel of wealth. The North American Review, 183(599), 526–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. (2008). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate social performance (CSP): Encyclopedia of business ethics and society. London, UK: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charter, M. (2017). Greener marketing: A responsible approach to business. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chauvey, J.-N., Giordano-Spring, S., Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2015). The normativity and legitimacy of CSR disclosure: Evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 789–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, T., Fenclova, E., & Dinan, C. (2013). Tourism and corporate social responsibility: A critical review and research agenda. Tourism Management Perspectives, 6, 122–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., Henriques, I., Husted, B. W., & Matten, D. (2016). Publishing country studies in business & society: Or, do we care about CSR in Mongolia? Business and Society, 55(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Grosbois, D. (2016). Corporate social responsibility reporting in the cruise tourism industry: A performance evaluation using a new institutional theory based model. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 24(2), 245–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (Vol. 17). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, S., & van Staden, C. (2016). Motivations for corporate social and environmental reporting: New Zealand evidence. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(3), 449–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doh, J. P., & Tashman, P. (2014). Half a world away: The integration and assimilation of corporate social responsibility, sustainability, and sustainable development in business school curricula. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(3), 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eweje, G., & Bentley, T. (2006). CSR and staff retention in New Zealand companies: A literature review (Department of Management and International Business Research Working Paper Series no. 6). Auckland, New Zealand: Massey University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, S. J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility practices in a developing country: Empirical evidence from Sri Lanka. The University of Waikato. Retrieved from http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10289/8361/thesis.pdf?sequence=3

  • Fischer, J. (2004). Social responsibility and ethics: Clarifying the concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(4), 381–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frame, B., Gordon, R., & Whitehouse, I. (2003). Corporate responsibility on New Zealand: A case study. Lincoln, NZ: Landcare Research NZ.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frame, B., & Taylor, R. (2005). Partnerships for sustainability: Effective practice? Local Environment, 10(3), 275–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C. (1960). The growing concern over business responsibility. California Management Review, 2(4), 54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A. (2003). Teaching teachers to teach corporate governance differently. Journal of Management and Governance, 7(3), 255–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gow, H. R., & Lockhart, J. C. (2016). The end of white gold fever: New Zealand’s dairy GFC. In C. Massey (Ed.), The New Zealand land & food annual (pp. 45–59). Auckland, NZ: Massey University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, R., Smith, J., Tashman, P., & Marshall, R. S. (2017). Why do SMEs go green? An analysis of wine firms in South Africa. Business and Society, 56(1), 23–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawarden, R., & Stablein, R. (2008). New Zealand woman directors: Many aspire but few succeed. In S. Vinnicombe, V. Singh, R. J. Burke, D. Bilimoria, & M. Huse (Eds.), Women on corporate board of directors: International research and practice. UK: Edward Elgar Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency. (2015). Energy balances of OECD countries 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/energy_bal_oecd-2015-en

  • Jamali, D., & Sidani, Y. (2008). Classical vs. modern managerial CSR perspectives: Insights from Lebanese context and cross-cultural implications. Business and Society Review, 113(3), 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarillo, J. C. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeper, T. (2011). Codes of ethics and corporate governance: A study of New Zealand listed companies. Corporate Governance after the Financial Crisis, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1947113

  • Khan, M., Lockhart, J., & Bathurst, R. (2017). Institutional impacts on corporate social responsibility: A comparative analysis between the jurisdictions of New Zealand and Pakistan. Paper presented at 4th International Conference on CSR, Sustainability. Perth, Australia: Ethics & Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloeten, N. (2014, September 18). Kiwis lag on corporate social responsibility. Stuff.co.nz. Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/better-business/10513699/Kiwis-lag-on-corporate-social-responsibility

  • Lawrence, S. R., Collins, E., Pavlovich, K., & Arunachalam, M. (2006). Sustainability practices of SMEs: The case of NZ. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(4), 242–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin-Hi, N., & Müller, K. (2013). The CSR bottom line: Preventing corporate social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1928–1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart, J. C. (2013). New Zealand: Staying in the black. In S. J. Konzelmann & M. Fovargue-Davies (Eds.), Banking systems in the crisis: The faces of liberal capitalism (pp. 134–154). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart, J. C., & Fraser, G. S. (2014). The pursuit of alternatives within: New Zealand post the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). In 26th Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics Annual Meeting. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, M. J. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in the New Zealand hotel industry: An explorative study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, L. (2015). Organising CSR for gender equality: Institutional work in the cocoa value chain. Doctoral Thesis, University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D. (2008). Corporate social responsibility theories. In A. Crane, D. Matten, A. McWilliams, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 46–82). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M. J., Trididga, H., & Walton, S. (2008). Words of action: The centrist and pragmatic discourse of sustainable development reporting. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings, Anaheim, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton-Smith, J. (1997). Business ethics in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(14), 1485–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. (2004). An open letter to the deans and the faculties of American business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 185–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. (2011). The rise and the fall of business schools: An autobiography. World Futures, 67(4–5), 244–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munitz, B. (2000). Changing landscape. Educause Review, 35(1), 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newson, M., & Deegan, C. (2002). Global expectations and their association with corporate social disclosure practices in Australia, Singapore, and South Korea. The International Journal of Accounting, 37(2), 183–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NZPA. (2009, January 31). NZ’s eco footprint sixth largest. Stuff. Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/694713/NZs-eco-footprint-sixth-largest

  • Orser, B. (1992). Academic attainment, assimilation and feminism in Canadian schools of business. Women in Management Review, 7(3), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D. (2005). CSR after Enron: A role for the academic accounting profession? European Accounting Review, 14(2), 395–404.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pajo, K., & McGhee, P. (2003). The institutionalisation of business ethics: Are New Zealand organisations doing enough? Journal of Management and Organization, 9(1), 52–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paynter, M., Halabi, A. K., & Lawton, A. (2018). The neo-institutionalism influences on corporate social responsibility reporting development in Australia: A three company study. In D. Crowther, S. Seifi, & A. Moyeen (Eds.), The goals of sustainable development: Responsibility and governance (pp. 193–214). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • PRME. (2018). List of participants. Retrieved from http://www.unprme.org/participation/search-participants.php?nameparent=&country%5B%5D=New+Zealand&from=&to=&utype=&search=Search

  • Risi, D. (2016). Longitudinal comparison between CSR implementation and CSR function’s resource access. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings, Anaheim, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, J. (2004). Corporate social responsibility in New Zealand. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 14, 22–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rundle-Thiele, S. R., & Wymer, W. (2010). Stand-alone ethics, social responsibility, and sustainability course requirements: A snapshot from Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Marketing Education, 32(1), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SBC. (2015, July 2). State of CSR report released. Retrieved from http://www.sbc.org.nz/news/2015/state-of-csr-report-released

  • Schultz, F., & Wehmeier, S. (2010). Institutionalization of corporate social responsibility within corporate communications. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(1), 9–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2004). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Series, N. E. R. (2018). Global greenhouse gas emissions. Retrieved from http://archive.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/environment/environmental-reporting-series/environmental-indicators/Home/Atmosphere-and-climate/global-greenhouse-gases.aspx

  • Sharma, S., & Hart, S. L. (2014). Beyond “saddle bag” sustainability for business education. Organization and Environment, 27(1), 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snider, J., Hill, R. P., & Martin, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world’s most successful firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2), 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotomayor, J. M. (2011). Socially responsible business schools: A proposed model. Doctoral Thesis, Universitat Ramon Llull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable Business Council. (2017a). Fonterra targets net zero emissions by 2050. Retrieved from http://www.sbc.org.nz/news/2017/fonterra-targets-net-zero-emissions-2050

  • Sustainable Business Council. (2017b). Sustainable Business Council welcomes Zero Carbon Act. Retrieved from http://www.sbc.org.nz/news/2017/zero-carbon-act

  • Swanson, D. L., & Frederick, W. C. (2003). Are business schools silent partners in corporate crime. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 9(1), 24–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahir, R. (2017). Women on corporate boards: The New Zealand perspective. In R. Benlamri & M. Sparer (Eds.), Leadership, innovation and entrepreneurship as driving forces of the global economy (pp. 473–483). Cham: Springer International.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thorelli, H. B. (1986). Networks: Between markets and hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International. (2017). Corruption perceptions index 2016. Retrieved 22 May 2017 from https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2016

  • Welford, R., Chan, C., & Man, M. (2007). Priorities for corporate social responsibility: A survey of businesses and their stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Business Council for Business Development. (2015, March 07). New Zealand Sustainable Business Council (NZ SBC). Retrieved from Retrieved from World Business Council for Business Development http://www.wbcsd.org/regional-network/members-list/oceania/nzbcsd.aspx

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Khan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Khan, M., Lockhart, J. (2019). Embedding Corporate Social Responsibility into Business Practice: Lessons Learned from New Zealand. In: Eweje, G., Bathurst, R. (eds) Clean, Green and Responsible?. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21436-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21436-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21435-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21436-4

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics