Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attitudes of Incumbent Regimes to a Renewable Energy Transition: A Case Study of Queensland, Australia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clean, Green and Responsible?

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

Transitions to renewable energy (RE) have been the subject of considerable debate in both academic and policy circles (Geels, Research Policy 31(8/9):1257–1274, 2002). In this study, we examine documents at both state and federal level to ascertain whether key stakeholders, such as mining, business, utilities and the energy sector, are concerned with, and effectively planning for, a renewable energy transition. It is critical to examine their views, since powerful stakeholders can strengthen, or undermine, the commitment of government to a renewable energy transition. The literature shows quite clearly that government policies are critical in transitions, for instance policies can spur private investment and influence actors’ perceptions of the risk-reward equation (Wüstenhagen and Menichetti, Energy Policy 40:1–10, 2012). We highlight the assumptions, narratives and tensions that underlie an energy transition. As a theoretical basis for this research, the lens of ‘social acceptance’, including socio-political, community and market acceptance, is employed (Wüstenhagen, Wolsink, and Bürer, Energy Policy 35(5):2683–2691, 2007). The study evaluates social acceptance of renewable energy on a continuum ranging from ‘not accepted’, ‘moving towards acceptance’, and ‘high acceptance’ where responses are progressive and innovative. Although scholars note that owners of fossil fuels are a powerful lobby group and are able to obstruct ambitious climate policy quite effectively because they are well-organised and their business models are based on the use of cheap fossil fuels (Edenhofer and Flachsland, Global Trends 2013. Development and Peace Foundation, Bonn, pp. 53–72; Hall and Taplin, Australian Journal of Social Issues 43(3):359–379, 2008), this study found that there is a certain level of social acceptance for an energy transition. Key stakeholders—mining, utilities, energy and the business sector—support an integrated climate and energy policy to help Australia meets its commitments under the Paris agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Minerals Council of Australia (MCA) also includes the Australian Coal Association (ACA), which ceased its operations and was integrated with the MCA in 2013.

  2. 2.

    The Energy Supply Association of Australia (ESAA) ceased operating in 2016 and merged with the Australian Energy Council and Energy Networks Australia.

  3. 3.

    Certain types of power plants and energy storage systems provide “inertia” which helps to maintain power when supply and demand become unbalanced, or unequal over short time periods (Climate Council, 2017b).

References

  • AER (Australian Energy Regulator). (2017, May). State of the energy market. Retrieved from https://www.aer.gov.au/system/files/AER%20State%20of%20the%20energy%20market%202017%20-%20A4.pdf

  • Araújo, K. (2014). The emerging field of energy transitions: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Energy Research and Social Science, 1, 112–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, H. A. (2016). The nexus of the coal industry and the state in Australia: Historical dimensions and contemporary challenges. Energy Policy, 99, 194–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, I., Peterson, A., Brown, G., & McAlpine, C. (2012). Local government response to the impacts of climate change: An evaluation of local climate adaptation plans. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(2), 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, E., & Shandas, V. (2010). Innovation and climate action planning: Perspectives from municipal plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(4), 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batel, S., & Devine-Wright, P. (2015). A critical and empirical analysis of the national-local ‘gap’in public responses to large-scale energy infrastructures. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(6), 1076–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batel, S., Devine-Wright, P., & Tangeland, T. (2013). Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion. Energy Policy, 58, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baynham, M., & Stevens, M. (2014). Are we planning effectively for climate change? An evaluation of official community plans in British Columbia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(4), 557–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazeley, P. (2009). Analysing qualitative data: More than ‘identifying themes. Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research, 2(2), 6–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berke, P. R., & French, S. P. (1994). The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality. Journal of planning education and research, 13(4), 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, C. (2016). A resource-based view of opportunities to transform Australia’s electricity sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boote, J., & Matthews, A. (1999). Saying is one thing; doing is another: The role of observation in market research. Journal of Qualitative Market Research, 2(1), 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brackertz, N., & Meredyth, D. (2008). Social inclusion of the hard to reach. community consultation and the hard to reach: Local government, social profiling and civic infrastructure. Hawthorn, VIC, Swinburne University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckman, G., & Diesendorf, M. (2010). Design limitations in Australian renewable electricity policies. Energy Policy, 38(7), 3365–3376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H. (2000). Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18(6), 727–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. (2017, April 3). Is this the worst mistake Australia could make? Retrieved from http://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/is-this-the-worst-mistake-australia-could-make/news-story/f461955f66050fb32f0c1717571399fa

  • Climate Change Authority. (2012). About the CCA. Retrieved from http://climatechangeauthority.gov.au/about-cca

  • Climate Change Authority. (2017). Submissions. Current consultations. Special review on power system security, electricity prices and emission reductions. Retrieved from http://climatechangeauthority.gov.au/submissions

  • Climate Council (2017a). State of solar 2016: Globally and in Australia. Retrieved from https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/solar-report

    Google Scholar 

  • Climate Council. (2017b). Fact sheet: 10 basic electricity facts to help you navigate the Finkel Review. Retrieved from http://www.climatecouncil.org.au/fact-sheet-10-basic-electricity-facts-to-help-you-navigate-the-finkel-review

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2017). The independent review into the future security of the national electricity market: Blueprint for the future. Canberra: Department of the Environment and Energy. Retrieved from http://www.environment.gov.au/energy/national-electricity-market-review

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, L. H. (2016). Energy futures, state planning policies and coal mine contests in rural New South Wales. Energy Policy, 99, 233–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K. (2007). Is Australia faking it? The Kyoto Protocol and the greenhouse policy challenge. Global Environmental Politics, 7(4), 118–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation). (2015). Australian government, climate change in Australia: Technical report. Retrieved from http://www.climatechangeinaustralia.gov.au/en/publications-library/technical-report

  • Department of the Environment, Australian Government. (n.d.). Climate change impacts in Queensland. Retrieved from http://www.environment.gov.au/climate-change/climatescience/impacts/qld

  • Devine-Wright, P., Batel, S., Aas, O., Sovacool, B., LaBelle, M. C., & Ruud, A. (2017). A conceptual framework for understanding the social acceptance of energy infrastructure: Insights from energy storage. Energy Policy, 107, 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975, January). Organisational legitimacy: Social values and organisational behaviour. Pacific Sociological Review, 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzonzi-Undi, J., & Li, S. (2016). Policy influence on clean coal uptake in China, India, Australia, and USA. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy, 35(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagle, L., Osmond, A., McCarthy, B., Low, D., & Lesbirel, H. (2017). Social marketing strategies for renewable energy transitions. Australasian Marketing Journal, 25(2), 141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edenhofer, O., & Flachsland, C. (2013). Transforming the global energy system: Pathways towards a sustainable energy supply. In T. Debiel, J. Hippler, M. Roth, & C. Ulbert (Eds.), Global Trends 2013 (pp. 53–72). Bonn: Development and Peace Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edenhofer, O., Knopf, B., & Luderer, G. (2013). Reaping the benefits of renewables in a nonoptimal world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(29), 11666–11667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edenhofer, O., Seyboth, K., Creutzig, F., & Schlömer, S. (2013). On the sustainability of renewable energy sources. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38, 169–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESDNews (2017, May 30). CEFC to be allowed to invest in clean coal technology. Retrieved from http://www.esdnews.com.au/cefc-allowed-invest-css-technology/

  • Evans, G., & Phelan, L. (2016). Transition to a post-carbon society: Linking environmental justice and just transition discourses. Energy Policy, 99, 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, C. B., Barros, V., Stocker, T. F., Dahe, Q., Dokken, D. J., Ebi, K. L., … Tignor, M. (Eds.). (2013). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: Special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, A. (2017). Independent review into the future security of the national electricity market—Blueprint for the future—A snapshot. Australian Government, Department of the Environment and Energy, Canberra. Retrieved from https://www.energy.gov.au/government-priorities/energy-markets/independent-review-future-security-national-electricity-market

  • Foran, C. (2016). Donald Trump and the triumph of climate-change denial. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/12/donald-trump-climate-change-skeptic-denial/510359/

  • Garnaut, R. (2008). The Garnaut climate change review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case study. Research Policy, 31(8/9), 1257–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2012). A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture and Society, 31, 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubler, A. (2012). Energy transitions research: Insights and cautionary tales. Energy Policy, 50, 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, N. L., & Taplin, R. (2008). Room for climate advocates in a coal-focused economy? NGO influence on Australian climate policy. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 43(3), 359–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heazle, M., Tangney, P., Burton, P., Howes, M., Grant-Smith, D., Reis, K., & Bosomworth, K. (2013). Mainstreaming climate change adaptation: An incremental approach to disaster risk management in Australia. Environmental Science and Policy, 33, 162–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, B. D., & Slatick, E. R. (1994). Carbon dioxide emissions factors for coal. Washington DC: US Energy Information Agency (EIA). Retrieved from http://www.eia.gov/coal/production/quarterly/co2_article/co2.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. P., Kerry, J. T., Álvarez-Noriega, M., Álvarez-Romero, J. G., Anderson, K. D., Baird, A. H., … Bridge, T. C. (2017). Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals. Nature, 543(7645), 373–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson, S., & Lauber, V. (2006). The politics and policy of energy system transformation: Explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy policy, 34(3), 256–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. (2009). The future of renewable energy in Australia: A test for cooperative federalism? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallies, A. (2016). A barrier for Australia’s climate commitments? Law, the electricity market and transitioning the stationary electricity sector. UNSW Law Journal, 39(4), 1547–1582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. I., & Wiser, R. H. (2007). Fostering a renewable energy technology industry: An international comparison of wind industry policy support mechanisms. Energy policy, 35(3), 1844–1857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (2001). The market system. What it is, how it works, and what to make of it. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhijani, S., & Doukas, A. (2015). G20 subsidies to oil, gas and coal production: Australia. Background Paper for the Report Empty Promises: G20 subsidies to oil, gas and coal production. Oil Change International (OCI) and the Overseas Development Institute (ODI). Retrieved from https://www.odi.org/publications/10071-g20-subsidies-oil-gas-coal-production-australia

  • Marshall, J. P. (2016). Disordering fantasies of coal and technology: Carbon capture and storage in Australia. Energy Policy, 99, 288–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N. J., & Rice, J. L. (2012). Developing renewable energy supply in Queensland, Australia: A study of the barriers, targets, policies and actions. Renewable Energy, 44, 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinot, E. (2016). Grid integration of renewable energy: Flexibility, innovation, and experience. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 223–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M. (2005). Perspectives on Australian foreign policy, 2004. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 59(2), 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, T., & Wiseman, J. (2016). Company directors can be held legally liable for ignoring the risks from climate change. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/company-directors-can-be-held-legally-liable-for-ignoring-the-risks-from-climate-change-68068

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 70–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molyneaux, L., Froome, C., Wagner, L., & Foster, J. (2013). Australian power: Can renewable technologies change the dominant industry view? Renewable energy, 60, 215–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moula, M. M. E., Maula, J., Hamdy, M., Fang, T., Jung, N., & Lahdelma, R. (2013). Researching social acceptability of renewable energy technologies in Finland. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 2(1), 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. (2016). Redesigning a 20th century regulatory framework to deliver 21st century energy technology. Journal of Bioeconomics, 19(1), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T., Nelson, J., Ariyaratnam, J., & Camroux, S. (2013). An analysis of Australia’s large scale renewable energy target: Restoring market confidence. Energy Policy, 62, 386–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P., & Paterson, M. (1998). A climate for business: global warming, the state and capital. Review of International Political Economy, 5(4), 679–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parliament of Australia. (2017). Submissions received by the Committee. Retrieved from http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Environment_and_Communications/Coal_fired_power_stations/Submissions

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Renewable Energy Expert Panel. (2016). Final report: Credible pathways to a 50% renewable energy target for Queensland. Retrieved from https://www.dews.qld.gov.au/electricity/solar/solar-future/expert-panel

  • Qvenild, M., Knudsen, J. K., Andersen, O., & Jacobsen, G. B. (2015). Political and societal dimensions of hydrobalancing from Norway towards Europe. An assessment of drivers and barriers for further development (SINTEF Report TR A7530).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G., & Clifton, J. (2014). Picking winners and policy uncertainty: Stakeholder perceptions of Australia’s Renewable Energy Target. Renewable Energy, 67, 128–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, G., Aitkin, D., Jinks, B., & Warhurst, J. (2003). Australian political institutions. Sydney, NSW: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable sociotechnical transitions. Research Policy, 34(10), 1491–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., & Weller, P. (1978). Introduction. In R. Smith & P. Weller (Eds.), Public service inquiries in Australia (pp. 1–13). St Lucia, QLD: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeld, J., & Buys, L. (2014). Australian consumer attitudes and decision making on renewable energy technology and its impact on the transformation of the energy sector. Open Journal of Energy Efficiency, 3(3), 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, B. K., & Ratan, P. (2012). Conceptualizing the acceptance of wind and solar electricity. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(7), 5268–5279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Bambrick, H., Alexander, D., & Rice, M. (2017). Risky business: Health, climate and economic risks of the Carmichael Coalmine. Potts Point, NSW: Climate Council of Australia Limited. Retrieved from https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/uploads/0806fecbd0f2e78389a998d8403ac2bc.pdf

  • Tang, Z., Dai, Z., Fu, X., & Li, X. (2013). Content analysis for the US coastal states’ climate action plans in managing the risks of extreme climate events and disasters. Ocean and Coastal Management, 80, 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukker, A., & Butter, M. (2007). Governance of sustainable transitions: About the 4(0) ways to change the world. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 94–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unruh, G. C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12), 817–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2014). The problem of energy. Theory, Culture and Society, 31(5), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbong, G., & Geels, F. (2007). The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy, 35(2), 1025–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen, A., Fischedick, M., Moomaw, W., Weir, T., Nadai, A., Nilsson, L. J., … Sathaye, J. (2010). Renewable energy costs, potentials, barriers: Conceptual issues. Energy Policy, 38(2), 850–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolsink, M. (2010). Contested environmental policy infrastructure: Socio-political acceptance of renewable energy, water, and waste facilities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(5), 302–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolsink, M. (2012). The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: Renewable as common pool resources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 822–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolsink, M. (2013). The next phase in social acceptance of renewable innovation. EDI Quarterly, 5(1), 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wüstenhagen, R., & Menichetti, E. (2012). Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research. Energy Policy, 40, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2683–2691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Business, Law and Governance, James Cook University (JCU), Townsville, QLD, Australia

    Breda McCarthy & Lynne Eagle

Authors
  1. Breda McCarthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lynne Eagle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Breda McCarthy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Massey Business School, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand

    Gabriel Eweje

  2. Massey Business School, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand

    Ralph J. Bathurst

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McCarthy, B., Eagle, L. (2019). Attitudes of Incumbent Regimes to a Renewable Energy Transition: A Case Study of Queensland, Australia. In: Eweje, G., Bathurst, R. (eds) Clean, Green and Responsible?. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21436-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21436-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21435-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21436-4

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation