Have Fun with Math and Music!

  • Maria MannoneEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11502)


If abstraction makes mathematics strong, it often makes it also hard to learn, if not discouraging. If math pedagogy suffers from the lack of engaging strategies, the pedagogy of mathematical music theory must deal with the additional difficulty of double fields and double vocabulary. However, games and interdisciplinary references in a STEAM framework can help the learner break down complex concepts into essential ideas, and gain interest and motivation to approach advanced topics. Here we present some general considerations, followed by two examples which may be applied in a high-school or early college level course. The first is a musical application of a Rubik’s cube, the CubeHarmonic, to approach group theory and combinatorics jointly with musical chords; the second is an application of category theory to investigate simple musical variations together with transformations on a visual shape.


Motivations Groups Categories 


  1. 1.
    Aleinikov, A.G.: Creative pedagogy. In: Carayannis, E.G. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Creativity Invention Innovation and Entrepreneurship, p. 327. Springer, New York (2013). Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frey, A., Singmaster, D.: Handbook of the Cubik Math. Enslow Publishers, Hillside (1982)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kubovy, M., Schutz, M.: Audio-visual objects. Rev. Philos. Psychol. 1(1), 41–61 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lawvere, W., Schanuel, S.: Conceptual Mathematics: A First Introduction to Categories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mac Lane, S.: Categories for the Working Mathematician. Springer, New York (1978). Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mannone, M.: Introduction to gestural similarity in music. An application of category theory to the orchestra. J. Math. Music 12(2), 63–87 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mannone, M.: Can mathematical music theory be easily learnt and also be fun? In: Montiel, M., Gómez, F. (eds.) Theoretical and Practical Pedagogy of Mathematical Music Theory: Music for Mathematics and Mathematics for Musicians, From School to Postgraduate Levels, pp. 281–298. World Scientific, Singapore (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mannone, M., Kitamura, E., Huang, J., Sugawara, R., Kitamura, Y.: CubeHarmonic: a new interface from a magnetic 3D motion tracking system to music performance. In: Dahl, L., Bowman, D., Martin, T. (eds.) Proceedings of NIME Conference, Blacksburg, USA, pp. 350–351 (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mannone, M.: Networks of music and images. Gli Spazi della Musica 2(6), 38–52 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Markovits, Z.: Beliefs hold by pre-school prospective teachers toward mathematics and its teaching. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 11, 117–121 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Markovits, Z., Forgasz, H.: “Mathematics is like a lion”: elementary students’ beliefs about mathematics. Educ. Stud. Math. 96(1), 49–64 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mazzola, G., Pang, Y., Mannone, M.: Cool Math for Hot Music. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nolan, C.: On musical space and combinatorics: historical and conceptual perspectives in music theory. In: Sarhangi, R. (ed.) Bridges Proceedings, pp. 201–208 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roffler, S., Butler, R.: Factors that influence the localization of sound in the vertical plane. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 43, 1255–1259 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spence, C.: Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 73, 971–995 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tymoczko, D.: The generalized Tonnetz. J. Music Theory 1(56), 1–52 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zweig, J.: Ars combinatoria. Art J. 3(56), 20–29 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations