Skip to main content

A Social Democratic Vision

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reimagining Administrative Justice
  • 238 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers the social democratic origins of post-war administrative justice and human rights. It emphasises the relevance of administrative justice to ordinary daily life and its importance as a set of principles that govern the relationship between individual citizens and the democratic state. It identifies the social rights entitlements to health, social care, education and housing as integral to the post-war human rights vision, and touches upon the way in which the devolved legislatures in Scotland and Wales have begun to reinstate that vision. It proposes the ‘relational’ character of both administrative justice and human rights as central and a ‘duty of active kindness’ as critical to their realisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, M. (Ed.). (2010). Administrative Justice in Context. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, M. (2012). The Rise and Fall of Administrative Justice—A Cautionary Tale. Socio-Legal Review, 8, 29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambedkar, B. R. (2010). Speech Delivered on 25 November 1949. In B. Das (Ed.), Thus Spoke Ambedkar. New Delhi: Navayana Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben Jelloun, T. (2016). By Fire: Writings on the Arab Spring (R. S. Nezami, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (1969). Two Concepts of Liberty. In I. Berlin (Ed.), Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busck, L. (1995). The History and Development of the Institution of Ombudsman. In H. Gammeltoft-Hansen (Ed.), The Danish Ombudsman. Copenhagen: The Danish Ombudsman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassin, R. (1972). La Pensee et l’Action. Boulogne: F Lalou.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossman, R. (1956). Socialism and the New Despotism. London: Fabian Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC). (2017). Following Grenfell: The Human Rights and Equality Dimension. Statement from the Equality and Human Rights Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. (2010). Changes in Human Rights. In M. Adler (Ed.), Administrative Justice in Context. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gearty, C. (2006). Can Human Rights Survive? Cambridge: CUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, M. (2001). A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, J. (2017). Compassion, Ethics of Care and Legal Rights. International Journal of Law in Context, 13(2), 158–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilson. (2008). The Nordic Model: Scandinavia since 1945. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, N. E. (1995). The Ombudsman—A Gift from Scandinavia to the World. In H. Gammeltoft-Hansen (Ed.), The Danish Ombudsman. Copenhagen: The Danish Ombudsman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laverty, P., & Loach, K. (2016). I, Daniel Blake. Pontefract: Route Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leggatt, S. A. (2001). Tribunals for Users—One System, One Service. London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO). (2018). Annual Report 2017–18. London: LGSCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, C. (1968). Introduction. In O. Nolde (Ed.), Free and Equal: Human Rights in Ecumenical Perspective. Geneva: World Council of Churches.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. (1992). Citizenship and Social Class. In T. H. Marshall & T. Bottomore (Eds.), Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2017). Tribunals and Gender Recognition Certificate Statistics Quarterly July–September 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2018). Tribunals and Gender Recognition Certificate Statistics Quarterly April–June 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris Jones, W. H. (1949). Socialism and Bureaucracy. London: Fabian Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, T. (2017). Access to Justice in Administrative Law and Administrative Justice. In E. Palmer et al. (Eds.), Austerity and Access to Justice. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nason, S. (2018). Administrative Justice: Wales’ First Devolved Justice System: Evaluation and Recommendations. Bangor University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, L. (2010). House of Lords Hansard, 29 November 2010, Col. 1325.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Cinneide, C. (2018). The Social Security (Scotland) Act 2018—A Rights-Based Approach to Social Security? Edinburgh Law Review, 23, 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, G. (2008). The Intellectuals’ Ideal: British Views of Scandinavia in the 1950s and 1960s. In J. E. Myhre (Ed.), Intellectuals in the Public Sphere in Britain and Norway after World War II. Oslo: Oslo Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO). (2018). Annual Report 2017–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt, E. (1948). The Promise of Human Rights. Foreign Affairs. In A. Black (Ed.), Courage in a Dangerous World: The Political Writings of Eleanor Roosevelt (pp. 156–168). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt, E. (1958). The Great Question. Remarks delivered at the United Nations. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt, E. (2016). The Moral Basis of Democracy. New York: Open Road.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonfield, A. (1965). Modern Capitalism: The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power. London: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. (2004). The Second Bill of Rights: FDR’s Unfinished Revolution and Why We Need It More Than Ever. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. (2011). Speech to the Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council Annual Conference, 17 November 2011. Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R., & Tomlinson, J. (2017). Mapping Current Issues in Administrative Justice: Austerity and the ‘More Bureaucratic Rationality’ Approach. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 39(3), 380–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK Administrative Justice Institute (UKAJI). (2018). A Research Roadmap for Administrative Justice. Colchester: University of Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • White Paper: Transforming Public Services: Complaints, Redress and Tribunals. (2004). London: Department for Constitutional Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret Doyle .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Doyle, M., O’Brien, N. (2020). A Social Democratic Vision. In: Reimagining Administrative Justice. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21388-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics