Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

SAR Sea Ice Type Classification and Drift Retrieval in the Arctic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sea Ice in the Arctic

Part of the book series: Springer Polar Sciences ((SPPS))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abreu, R. D. (2000). RADAR sea ice signatures: An operational primer. In Proceedings of Workshop on mapping and archiving of sea ice data – the expanding role of radar, Ottawa, Canada, May 2–4 2000. JCOMM Tech. Rep. № 7, 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Absolute calibration of ASAR Level 1 products. (2004). Issue 1, revision 5, https://earth.esa.int/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=38042&name=DLFE-661.pdf

  • Agnew, T., & Howell, S. (2003). The use of operational ice charts for evaluating passive microwave ice concentration data. Atmosphere-Ocean, 41, 317–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albregtsen, F. (2008). Statistical texture measures computed from gray level coocurrence matrices. Image Processing Laboratory Department of Informatics, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcantarilla, P. F., Nuevo J., Bartoli A. (2013). Fast explicit diffusion for accelerated features in nonlinear scale spaces. British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldenhoff, W., Heuzé, C., & Eriksson, L. E. B. (2018). Comparison of ice/water classification in Fram Strait from C- and L-band SAR imagery. Annals of Glaciology, 59, 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2018.7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexandrov, V. Y., & Piotrovskaya, N. Y. (2008a). Assessment of the backscatter for various sea ice types from ENVISAT ASAR images. Earth Observation from Space, 4, 3–11. in Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexandrov, V. Y., & Piotrovskaya, N. Y. (2008b). Digital processing of ENVISAT ASAR images of the sea ice. Problems of Arctic and Antarctic, 1(78), 90–94. in Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexandrov, V. Y., Sandven, S., Kloster, K., Bobylev, L. P., & Zaitsev, L. V. (2004). Comparison of sea ice signatures in OKEAN and RADARSAT radar images for the northeastern Barents Sea. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(6), 882–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arkett, M., Flett, D., Roger, De A. (2006). Sea ice type and open water discrimination for operational ice monitoring with RADARSAT-2. In: Proc. of 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkett, M., Flett, D., Roger, De A. (2007). C-band multiple polarization SAR for ice monitoring – what can it do for the Canadian ice service. In: Proc. of ENVISAT Symposium 2007, Montreux, Switzerland, 23–27 April 2007 (ESA SP-636).

    Google Scholar 

  • Askne, J., Carlstrom, A., Dierking, W., Ulander, L. (1994). ERS-1 SAR backscatter modeling and interpretation of sea ice signatures. In: Proc. of IGARSS, Pasadena, California, Aug. 8–12, 162–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, P. M., & Tatnall, A. R. L. (1997). Neural networks in remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(4), 699–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balss, U., Breit, H., & Fritz, T. (2010). Noise-related radiometric correction in the TerraSAR-X multimode SAR processor. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(2), 741–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baraldi, A., & Parmiggiani, F. (1995). An investigation of the textural characteristics associated with gray level cooccurrens matrix statistical parameters. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 33(2), 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, D. G., McCullough, G., Babb, D., Komarov, A. S., Candlish, L. M., Lukovich, J. V., Asplin, M., Prinsenberg, S., Dmitrenko, I., & Rysgaard, S. (2014). Climate change and ice hazards in the Beaufort Sea. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 2, 000025. https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., & Van Gool, L. (2008). Speeded-up robust features (SURF). Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 110(3), 346–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaven, S. G., Gogineni, S. P., & Shanablen, M. (1994). Radar backscatter signatures of thin ice in the Central Arctic. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 15(5), 1149–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belchansky, G. I., Duglas, D. S., & Mordvintsev, I. N. (1998). Identification of sea ice types using radar data from “OKEAN-01” satellites and Look-Up Tables. Earth Observation from Space (Issledovanie Zemli iz Kosmosa), 6, 52–65. In Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benediktsson, A., Swain, P. H., & Ersoy, O. K. (1990). Neural network approaches versus statistical methods in classification of multisource remote sensing data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 28(4), 540–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, A., & Eriksson, L. E. (2012). SAR algorithm for sea ice concentration evaluation for the Baltic sea. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 9(5), 938–942. https://doi.org/10.1109/lgrs.2012.2186280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, A., & Eriksson, L. E. B. (2014). Investigation of a hybrid algorithm for sea ice drift measurements using synthetic aperture radar images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(8), 5023–5033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanov, A. V., Sandven, S., Johannessen, O. M., Alexandrov, V. Y., & Bobylev, L. P. (2005). Multisensor approach to automated classification of sea ice image data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43, 1648–1664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borodachev, V. E. (1998). Ice of Kara Sea. St. Petersburg, Hydrometeoizdat, 182 p. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brekke, C., Holt, B., Jones, C., & Skrunes, S. (2014). Discrimination of oil spills from newly formed sea ice by synthetic aperture radar. Remote Sensing of Environment, 145, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushuev, A. V., Bychenkov Yu. D., Loschilov V.S., Masanov A. D. (1983). Investigation of ice cover with help of side looking radar (SLR). Hydrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 120 pp. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushuev, A. V., Volkov, N. A., & Grischenko, V. D. (1995). Sea ice observations and studies, construction of the automated ice information system. Problems of Arctic and Antarctic, 70, 104–119. in Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausi, D. A. (2002). An analysis of co-occurrence texture statistics as a function of grey level quantization. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 28, 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausi, D. A., & Yue, B. (2004). Comparing cooccurrence probabilities and Markov random fields for texture analysis of SAR sea ice imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(1), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2003.817218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausi, D. A., Qin, A. K., Chowdhury, M. S., Yu, P., & Maillard, P. (2010). MAGIC: MAp-guided ice classification system. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 36., suppl. 1, S13–S25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, L. P. (2013). MAHOTAS: Open source software for scriptable computer vision. Journal of Open Research Software, 1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornford, D., Nabney, I. T., & Ramage, G. (2001). Improved neural network scatterometer forward models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106(C10), 22331–22338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daida, J., Samadani, R., & Vesecky, J. F. (1990). Object-oriented feature tracking algorithms for sar images of the marginal ice zone. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 28(4), 573–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellinger, F., Delon, J., Gousseau, Y., Michel, J., & Tupin, F. (2015). Sar-sift: A sift-like algorithm for sar images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(1), 453–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demchev, D. (2018). Retrieval, analysis and monitoring methods for sea ice and iceberg drift in the Arctic using radar data. PhD thesis (submitted), St. Petersburg State University, Dissertation in Oceanology, Russia, 244 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demchev, D., Volkov, V., Kazakov, E., Alcantarilla, P. F., Sandven, S., & Khmeleva, V. (2017). Sea ice drift tracking using A-KAZE features. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(9), 5174–5184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, H., & Clausi, D. A. (2005). Unsupervised segmentation of synthetic aperture Radar sea ice imagery using a novel Markov random field model. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(3), 528–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierking, W. (2010). Mapping of different sea ice regimes using images from Sentinel-1 and ALOS synthetic aperture radar. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48, 1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierking, W. (2013). Sea ice monitoring by synthetic aperture radar. Oceanography, 26, 100–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierking, W., & Busche, T. (2006). Sea ice monitoring by L-band SAR: An assessment based on literature and comparisons of JERS-1 and ERS-1 imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(2), 957–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierking, W., Skriver, H., Gudmandsen, P. (2003). SAR polarimetry for sea ice classification. Proc. of the POLinSAR Workshop. ESA, 14–16 Jan. 2003, Frascati, Italy, Special Publication: ESA SP– 529, pp. 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierking, W., Skriver, H., Gudmandsen, P. (2004). On the improvement of sea ice classification by means of radar polarimetry. Proc. of the 23rd European Association of Remote Sensing Laboratories (EARSeL) Symposium, June 2–5 2004, Ghent, Belgium, pp. 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dokken, S. T., Markus, P. W. T., Askne, J., & Bjork, G. (2002). ERS SAR characterization of coastal polynyas in the Arctic and comparison with SSM/I and numerical model investigations. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80, 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater, M. R., Crawford, J. P., Cavalieri, D. J. (1991). Multi-frequency, multi-polarization SAR and radiometer sea ice classification. Proceeding of International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS’91). New York, USA, 3–6 Jun 1991, Vol. I., pp. 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater, M. R., Kwok, R., Rignot, E., Israelsson, H., Onstott, R. G., Winebrenner, D. P. (1992). Potential applications of polarimetry to the classification of sea ice. In F. D. Carsey (Ed.), Microwave remote sensing of sea ice (Geophysical monograph 68) (pp. 419–430). Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fetterer, F. M., Gineris, D., & Kwok, R. (1994). Sea ice type maps from Alaska synthetic aperture radar facility imagery: An assessment. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99(C11), 22,443–22,458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fily, M., & Rothrock, D. (1987). Sea ice tracking by nested correlations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, (5), 570–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A. (1992). Radiometric calibration of SAR image data. XVII Congress for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS). http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXIX/congress/part1/212_XXIX-part1.pdf.

  • Geldsetzer, T., & van der Sanden, J. J. (2013). Identification of polarimetric and nonpolarimetric C-band SAR parameters for application in the monitoring of lake ice freeze-up. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(3), 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geldsetzer, T., & Yackel, J. J. (2009). Sea ice type and open water discrimination using dual co-polarized C-band SAR. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 35, 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, A., Massom, R., Heil, P., & Hyland, G. (2011). Semi-automated feature tracking of east Antarctic sea ice from Envisat ASAR imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(9), 2267–2276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. S. (2001). Operational detection of sea ice edges and icebergs using SAR. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(5), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. S. (2003). SAR ice classification using fuzzy screening method. In Proc. of Workshop on Applications of SAR Polarimetry and Polarimetric Interferometry (POLinSAR), 14–16 January 2003, Frascati, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, J. P. S., & Yackel, J. J. (2012). Evaluation of C-band SAR polarimetric parameters for discriminating of first-year sea ice types. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 38, 306–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greidanus, H., & Santamaria, C. (2014). First analyses of sentinel-1 images for maritime surveillance. JRC Science and policy reports, 56 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haarpaintner, J., & Solbø, S. (2007). Automatic ice-ocean discrimination in SAR imagery, Norut IT-report, Tech. Rep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara, Y., Atkins, R. G., Shin, R. T., Kong, J. A., Yueh, S. H., & Kwok, R. (1995). Application of neural networks for sea ice classification in polarimetric SAR images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 33(3), 740–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K. S., & Dinstein, I. (1973). Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 3, 610–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haverkamp, D., Soh, L. K., Tsatsoulis, C. 1993. A dynamic local thresholding technique for sea ice classification. In the 1993 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARRS’93), August 18–21, Tokyo, Japan. pp. 638–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haykin, S. (2006). Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heerman, P. D., & Khazenie, N. (1992). Classification of multispectral remote sensing data using a back-propagation neural network. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 30(1), 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrichs, J. F., Cavalieri, D. J., & Markus, T. (2006). Assessment of the AMSR-E ice concentration product at the ice edge using RADARSAT-1 and MODIS imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44, 3070–3079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Q. A., Nuesch, D. R., & Shuchman, R. A. (1984). Textural analysis and real-time classification of sea ice types using digital SAR data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 22(2), 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, D., & Yang, C. S. (2018). Automatic discrimination approach of sea ice in the Arctic Ocean using Sentinel-1 Extra Wide Swath dual-polarized SAR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(13), 4469–4483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, S. E. L., Wohlleben, T., Dabboor, M., Dersken, C., Komarov, A. S., & Pizzolato, L. (2013a). Recent changes in the exchange of sea ice between the Arctic Ocean and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Journal of Geophysical Research, 118(7), 3595–3607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, S. E. L., Wohlleben, T., Komarov, A. S., Pizzolato, L., & Derksen, C. (2013b). Recent extreme light sea ice years in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago: 2011 and 2012 eclipse 1998 and 2007. The Cryosphere, 7, 1753–1768. https://doi.org/10.5194/tcd-7-1313-2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C. -W., Chang, C. -C., & Lin, C. -J. (2016). A practical guide to support vector classification. Initial version: 2003. Last updated: May 19, 2016. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/papers/guide/guide.pdf.

  • Isleifson, D., Hwang, B., Barber, D. G., Scharien, R. K., & Shafai, L. (2010). C-band polarimetric backscattering signatures of newly formed sea ice during fall freeze-up. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(8), 3256–3267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies, B. (2012). RADARSAT-2—new ice information products. Proc. of the 13th Meeting—International Ice Charting Working Group, 15–19 October 2012, Tromso, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannessen, O. M., Alexandrov, V., Frolov, I., Bobylev, L., Sandven, S., Miles, M., Pettersson, L., Kloster, K., Smirnov, V., Mironov, Y., & Babich, N. (2007). Remote sensing of sea ice in the Northern sea route: Studies and applications. Chichester: Springer-Praxis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, A. M., Brekke, C., Spreen, G., & King, J. A. (2018). X-, C-, and L-band SAR signatures of newly formed sea ice in Arctic leads during winter and spring. Remote Sensing of Environment, 204, 162–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaleschke, L., & Heygster, G. (2004). Towards multi-sensor microwave remote sensing of frost flowers on sea ice. Annals of Glaciology, 39(1), 219–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karvonen, J. A. (2004). Baltic Sea ice SAR segmentation and classification using modified pulse-coupled neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(7), 1566–1574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karvonen, J. (2010). C-band sea ice SAR classification based on segmentwise edge features. In P. Imperatore & D. Riccio (Eds.), Geoscience and remote sensing new achievements (pp. 129–146). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/9093. [Online] Available: https://www.intechopen.com/books/geoscience-and-remote-sensing-new-achievements/c-band-sea-ice-sar-classification-based-on-segmentwise-edge-features

    Google Scholar 

  • Karvonen, J. (2012). Operational SAR-based sea ice drift monitoring over the Baltic Sea. Ocean Science, 8(4), 473–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karvonen, J., Simila, M., & Makynen, M. (2005). Open water detection from Baltic Sea ice Radarsat-1 SAR imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2, 275–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komarov, A. S., & Barber, D. G. (2014). Sea ice motion tracking from sequential dual-polarization RADARSAT-2 images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(1), 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korosov, A., & Park, J. -W. (2016) Very high resolution classification of Sentinel-1A data using segmentation and texture features. Proc. of European Space Agency Living Planet Symposium, 9–13 May 2016, Prague, Czech Republic, ESA-SP Vol. 740, pp.44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korosov, A., & Rampal, P. (2017). A combination of feature tracking and pattern matching with optimal parametrization for sea ice drift retrieval from SAR data. Remote Sensing, 9, 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9030258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korosov, A., Hansen, M. W., Yamakava, A. (2015a). Nansat – scientist friendly toolbox for processing satellite data. World Ocean Scientific Congress, 2–8 February, 2015, Cochin, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korosov, A., Zakhvatkina, N., Muckenhuber, S. (2015b) Ice/water classification of sentinel-1 images. Geophysical Research Abstracts. Vol. 17, EGU General Assembly 2015. EGU2015-12487-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwok, R., & Cunningham, G. F. (1994). Backscatter characteristics of the winter ice cover in the Beaufort Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99(C4), 7787–7802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwok, R., Curlander, J. C., McConnell, R., & Pang, S. S. (1990). An ice-motion tracking system at the Alaska SAR facility. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 15(1), 44–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwok, R., Cunningham, G. F., & Holt, B. (1992). An approach to identification of sea ice types from spaceborne SAR data. In F. D. Carsey (Ed.), Microwave remote sensing of sea ice (Geophysical monograph 68) (pp. 355–360). Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kwok, R., Nghiem, S. V., Martin, S., Winebrenner, D. P., Gow, A. J., Perovich, D. K., Swift, C. T., Barber, D. G., Golden, K. M., & Knapp, E. J. (1998). Laboratory measurements of sea ice: Connections to microwave remote sensing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 36(5), 1716–1730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, S., Zhijie, W., & Clausi, D. A. (2014). Automated ice–water classification using dual polarization SAR satellite imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52, 5529–5539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levrini, G., & Attema, E. (2001). ENVISAT calibration and validation approach. European Space Agency. http://envisat.esa.int/m-s/envisat_mission_2001/CalVal/1Intro.html

  • Liu, A. K., Martin, S., & Kwok, R. (1997). Tracking of ice edges and ice floes by wavelet analysis of SAR images. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 14(5), 1187–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Guo, H., & Zhang, L. (2015). SVM-based sea ice classification using textural features and concentration from RADARSAT-2 Dual-Pol ScanSAR data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 8(4), 1601–1613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Scott, K. A., Gawish, A., & Fieguth, P. (2016). Automatic detection of the ice edge in SAR imagery using curvelet transform and active contour. Remote Sensing, 8(6), 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8060480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, D. G. (2004). Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60(2), 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundhaug, M., Johannessen, O. M., & Esbensen, K. H. (2002). ERS SAR studies of sea ice signatures in the Pechora Sea and Kara Sea region. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(2), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maillard, P., Clausi, D. A., & Deng, H. (2005). Map-guided sea ice segmentation and classification using SAR imagery and a MRF segmentation scheme. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43, 2940–2951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkynen, M., & Karvonen, J. (2017). Incidence angle dependence of first-year sea ice backscattering coefficient in Sentinel-1 SAR imagery over the Kara Sea. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55, 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkynen, M. P., Manninen, A. T., Similä, M. H., Karvonen, J. A., & Hallikainen, M. T. (2002). Incidence angle dependence of the statistical properties of C-band HH-polarization backscattering signatures of the Baltic Sea ice. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40, 2593–2605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MANICE. (2005). Manual of standard procedures for observing and reporting ice conditions, Canadian Ice Service – Environment Canada, ISBN 0-660-62858-9, Catalogue No. En56-175/2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, R., Kwok, R., Curlander, J. C., Kober, W., & Pang, S. S. (1991). Y-S correlation and dynamic time warping: Two methods for tracking ice floes in sar images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 29(6), 1004–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, W. N., Fetterer, F., Stewart, S. J., & Helfrich, S. (2015). How do sea-ice concentrations from operational data compare with passive microwave estimates? Implications for improved model evaluations and forecasting. Annals of Glaciology, 69, 332–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mejia, C., Thiria, S., Tran, N., Crépon, M., & Badran, F. (1998). Determination of the geophysical model function of the ERS-1 scatterometer by the use of neural networks. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(C6), 12853–12868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melling, H. (1998). Detection of features in first-year pack ice by synthetic aperture radar (SAR). International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(6), 1223–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen, M.-A. N., Anfinsen, S. N., Doulgeris, A. P., Renner, A. H. H., & Gerland, S. (2015). Assessing polarimetric SAR sea-ice classifications using consecutive day images. Annals of Glaciology, 56(69), 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen, M. -A. N., Doulgeris, A. P., Anfinsen, S. N., Renner, A. H. H., Hughes, N., Gerland, S., & Eltoft, T. (2013). Comparison of feature based segmentation of full polarimetric SAR satellite sea ice images with manually drawn ice charts. The Cryosphere, 7(6), 1693–1705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muckenhuber, S., Korosov, A. A., & Sandven, S. (2016). Open-source feature-tracking algorithm for sea ice drift retrieval from Sentinel-1 SAR imagery. The Cryosphere, 10(2), 913–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nghiem, S. V., & Bertoia, C. (2001). Multi-polarization C-band SAR signatures of Arctic sea ice. Focus issue on ice and icebergs. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 2(5), 387–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nghiem, S. V., Martin, S., Perovich, D. K., Kwok, R. M., Drucker, R., & Gow, A. J. (1997). A laboratory study of the effect of frost flowers on C-band radar backscatter from sea ice. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102(C2), 3357–3370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochilov, S., & Clausi, D. A. (2012). Operational SAR sea-ice image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50, 4397–4408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onstott, R. G. (1992). SAR and Scatterometer signatures of sea ice. In F. D. Carsey (Ed.), Microwave remote sensing of sea ice (Geophysical monograph 68) (pp. 73–102). Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Onstott, R. G., & Shuchman, R. A. (2004). SAR measurements of sea ice. In C. R. Jackson & J. A. Apel (Eds.), SAR marine User’s manual (pp. 81–116). Washington, DC: NOAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. W., Korosov, A. A., Babiker, M., Sandven, S., & Won, J. (2018). Efficient thermal noise removal for Sentinel-1 TOPSAR cross-polarization channel. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(3), 1555–1565. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2765248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partington, K. C., Flach, J. D., Barber, D., Isleifson, D., Meadows, P. J., & Verlaan, P. (2010). Dual-polarization C-band radar observations of sea ice in the Amundsen Gulf. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(6), 2685–2691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, L. T., Saldo, R., Fenger-Nielsen, R. (2015). Sentinel-1 results: Sea ice operational monitoring. Proc. of 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss.2015.7326403.

  • Perona, P., & Malik, J. (1990). Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12(7), 734 629–734 639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrou, Z. I., & Tian, Y. L. (2017) High-resolution sea ice motion estimation with optical flow using satellite spectroradiometer data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55, 1339–1350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, W. (1982). Digital image processing (translation from English). Moscow: Mir, vol. 2, 1982 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • RADARSAT-2 product description. (2011). MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates (MDA), Tech. Rep. Issue 1/8, http://gs.mdacorporation.com/includes/documents/RN-SP-52-1238RS-2ProductDescription1-8_15APR2011.pdf. Last access: 1 July 2014. 15 April 2011.

  • Ramsay, B., Manore, M., Weir, L., Wilson, K., & Bradley, D. (1998). Use of RADARSAT data in the Canadian ice service. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(1), 36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, S., & Chatterji, B. (1996). An FFT-based technique for translation, rotation, and scale-invariant image registration. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 5(8), 1266–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ressel, R., Frost, A., & Lehner, S. (2015). A neural network-based classification for sea ice types on X-band SAR images. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 8(7), 3672–3680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ressel, R., Singha, S., Lehner, S., Rosel, A., & Spreen, G. (2016). Investigation into different Polarimetric features for sea ice classification using X-band synthetic aperture radar. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 9, 3131–3143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romeiser, J., Horstmann Caruso, M. J., & Graber, H. C. (2013). A descalloping post-processor for ScanSAR images of ocean scenes. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51, 3259–3272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rublee, E., Rabaud, V., Konolige, K., Bradski, G. (2011). ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF. In: 2011 International conference on computer vision, IEEE, pp. 2564–2571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandven, S., Johannessen, O. M., Miles, M. W., Pettersson, L. H., & Kloster, K. (1999). Barents Sea seasonal ice zone features and processes from ERS 1 synthetic aperture radar: Seasona ice zone experiment 1992. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104(C7), 15843–15857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandven, S., Dalen, O., Lundhaug, M., Kloster, K., Alexandrov, V. Y., & Zaitsev, L. V. (2001). Sea ice investigations in the Laptev Sea area in late summer using SAR data. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(5), 502–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuchl, B., Flett, D., Caves, R., & Cumming, I. (2004). Potential of RADARSAT-2 data for operational sea ice monitoring. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 30, 448–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K., Tous Ramon, N., & Schwerdt, M. (2018). Radiometric accuracy and stability of Sentinel-1A determined using point targets. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies, 10, 538–546. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1759078718000016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sentinel-1 Product Specification. (2016). Document S1-RS-MDA-52-7441, Issue 3/3, 2016. https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/349449/

  • Shokr, M. E. (1991). Evaluation of second-order texture parameters for sea ice classification from radar images. Journal of Geophysical Research, 96, 10625–10640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shokr, M. E. (2009). Compilation of a radar backscatter database of sea ice types and open water using operational analysis of heterogeneous ice regimes. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 35, 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soh, L. K., & Tsatsoulis, C. (1999a). Texture analysis of SAR sea ice imagery using gray level co-occurrence matrices. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37, 780–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soh, L. K., & Tsatsoulis, C. (1999b). Unsupervised segmentation of ERS and RADARSAT sea ice images using multiresolution peak detection and aggregated population equalization. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(15–16), 3087–3109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soh, L. K., & Tsatsoulis, C. (2002). ARCTOS: A knowledge engineering software tool for images. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(6), 469–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soh, L. K., Tsatsoulis, C., Gineris, D., & Bertoia, C. (2004). ARKTOS: An intelligent system for SAR sea ice image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42, 229–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y. (1996). Automatic ice motion retrieval from ERS-1 SAR images using the optical flow method. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(11), 2059–2087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thermal Denoising of Products Generated by Sentinel-1 IPF. (2017). Issue 1.1. https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/2142675/Thermal-Denoising-of-Products-Generated-by-Sentinel-1-IPF.

  • Thomsen, B. B., Nghiem, S., & Kwok, R. (1998). Polarimetric C-band SAR observations of sea ice in the Greenland Sea. Proc. of 1998 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 6–10 July, Seattle, WA, USA, Cat. No. 98CH36174, vol. 5, pp. 2502–2504. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.1998.702259.

  • Topouzelis, K., Singha, S., & Kitsiou, D. (2016). Incidence angle normalization of Wide Swath SAR data for oceanographic applications. Open Geosciences, 8(1), 450–464. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2016-0029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tso, B., & Mather, P. M. (2001). Classification methods for remotely sensed data. London: Taylor and Francis. 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ulaby, F. T., Moore, R. K., & Fung, A. K. (1981). Microwave remote sensing: Active and passive. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesecky, J. F., Samadani, R., Smith, M. P., Daida, J. M., & Bracewell, R. N. (1988). Observation of sea-ice dynamics using synthetic aperture radar images: Automated analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 26(1), 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkov, V. A., Zakhvatkina, N., Mushta, A., Vesman, A., Kazakov, E., Shakhin, D. (2018). Automated monitoring of the sea ice in the Kara Sea for practical applications. Proc. of SCAR-IASC Open Science Conference. 19–23 June 2018, Davos, Switzerland, pp. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackerman, C. C. (1992). Digital SAR Image. In F. D. Carsey (Ed.), Microwave remote sensing of sea ice (Geophysical monograph 68) (pp. 105–110). Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wackerman, C. C., Miller D. L. (1996). An automated algorithm for sea ice classification in the marginal ice zone using ERS-1 synthetic aperture radar imagery. ERIM, Ann Arbor, MI, Tech. Rep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadhams, P. (2003). How does Arctic sea ice form and decay? [Online]. Available: http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/essay_wadhams.html.

  • Wang, S., You, H., & Fu, K. (2012). BFSIFT: A novel method to find feature matches for sar image registration. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 9(4), 649–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, W. F., & Ackley, S. F. (1986). Growth structure and properties of sea ice. In N. Untersteiner (Ed.), The geophysics of sea ice (NATO ASI Series, Series B: Physics) (Vol. 146., Chap. 1, pp. 9–153). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Winebrenner, D. P., Bredow, J., Fung, A. K., Drinkwater, M. R., Nghiem, S., Gow, A. J., Perovich, D. K., Grenfell, T. C., Han, H. C., Kong, J. A., Lee, J. K., Mudallar, S., Onstott, R. G., Tsang, L., & West, R. D. (1992). Microwave sea ice signature modelling. In F. D. Carsey (Ed.), Microwave remote sensing of sea ice (Geophysical monograph 68) (pp. 137–175). Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Winebrenner, D. P., Holt, B., & Nelson, E. D. (1996). Observation of autumn freeze-up in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas using the ERS-1 synthetic aperture radar. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101(C7), 16401–16419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlleben, T., Howell, S., Agnew, T., & Komarov, A. (2012). Sea ice motion and flux within the Prince Gustaf Adolf Sea, Queen Elizabeth Islands, Canada during 2010. Atmosphere-Ocean. https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2012.750232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Meteorological Organization. (1989). WMO sea ice nomenclature (p. 259). Geneva: WMO Rep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Q., & Clausi, D. A. (2008). IRGS: Image segmentation using edge penalties and region growing. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis, 30, 2126–2139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Q., Moloney, C., & Williams, F. M. (2002). SAR sea-ice texture classification using discrete wavelet transform based methods. Proc. of 2002 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), vol. 5, pp. 3041–3043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakhvatkina, N. (2009). Identification of Sea Ice in the Arctic using SAR data. PhD thesis, Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, Dissertation for the degree of candidate of physical and mathematical sciences in Oceanology, Russia, 169 p. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakhvatkina, N., Alexandrov, V., Johannessen, O. M., Sandven, S., & Frolov, I. (2013). Classification of sea ice types in ENVISAT synthetic aperture radar images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51, 2587–2600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakhvatkina, N., Korosov, A., Muckenhuber, S., Sandven, S., & Babiker, M. (2017). Operational algorithm for ice water classification on dual-polarized RADARSAT-2 images. The Cryosphere, 11(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-33-2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, Nansen International Environmental and Remote Sensing Centre, Saint Petersburg, Russia

    Natalia Y. Zakhvatkina

  2. Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, Saint Petersburg, Russia

    Denis Demchev

  3. Nansen International Environmental and Remote Sensing Centre, Saint Petersburg, Russia

    Denis Demchev & Vladimir A. Volkov

  4. Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, Bergen, Norway

    Stein Sandven

  5. University Centre in Svalbard Longyearbyen, Svalbard, Norway

    Stein Sandven

  6. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    Alexander S. Komarov

Authors
  1. Natalia Y. Zakhvatkina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Denis Demchev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stein Sandven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vladimir A. Volkov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alexander S. Komarov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia Y. Zakhvatkina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Nansen Scientific Society, Bergen, Norway

    Ola M. Johannessen

  2. Nansen International Environmental and Remote Sensing Centre (NIERSC), Saint Petersburg, Russia

    Leonid P. Bobylev

  3. Nansen International Environmental and Remote Sensing Centre (NIERSC) and Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

    Elena V. Shalina

  4. Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, Bergen, Norway, University Centre in Svalbard, Longyearbyen, Svalbard, Norway

    Stein Sandven

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zakhvatkina, N.Y., Demchev, D., Sandven, S., Volkov, V.A., Komarov, A.S. (2020). SAR Sea Ice Type Classification and Drift Retrieval in the Arctic. In: Johannessen, O., Bobylev, L., Shalina, E., Sandven, S. (eds) Sea Ice in the Arctic. Springer Polar Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21301-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation