Skip to main content

Using Machine Learning Techniques for Evaluating the Similarity of Enterprise Architecture Models

Technical Paper

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11483))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Enterprises Architectures (EA) are facilitated to coordinate enterprise’s business visions and strategies successfully and effectively. The practitioners of EA (architects) communicate the architecture to other stakeholders via architecture models. We investigate the scenario where accepted architecture models are stored in a repository. We identified the problem of unnecessary repository expansion by adding model components with similar properties or behavior as already existing repository components. The proposed solution aims to find those similar components and to notify the architect about their existence.

We present two approaches for defining and combining similarities between EA model components. The similarity measures are calculated upon the properties of the components and on the context of their usage. We further investigate the behavior of similar architecture models and search for associations in order to obtain components that might be of interest. At the end, we provide a prototype tool for both generating requests and obtaining a result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka.

  2. 2.

    https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/arules/index.html.

  3. 3.

    https://www.archimatetool.com.

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Srikant, R.: Fast algorithms for mining association rules in large databases. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB 1994, pp. 487–499. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahlemann, F., Stettiner, E., Messerschmidt, M., Legner, C.: Strategic Enterprise Architecture Management: Challenges, Best Practices, and Future Developments. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24223-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Aier, S., Schoenherr, M.: Integrating an enterprise architecture using domain clustering. In: Lankhorst, M.M., Johnson, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research, pp. 23–30, June 2007

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bastian, M., Heymann, S., Jacomy, M.: Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: ICWSM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Champin, P.-A., Solnon, C.: Measuring the similarity of labeled graphs. In: Ashley, K.D., Bridge, D.G. (eds.) ICCBR 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2689, pp. 80–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45006-8_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Deza, M.M., Deza, E.: Encyclopedia of Distances. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00234-2

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., Van Dongen, B., Käärik, R., Mendling, J.: Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evaluation. Inf. Syst. 36(2), 498–516 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dreyfus, D., Iyer, B.: Enterprise architecture: a social network perspective. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2006), vol. 8 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Han, J.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jeh, G., Widom, J.: SimRank: a measure of structural-context similarity. In: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 538–543. ACM, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., Uba, R., Dijkman, R.: Business process model merging: an approach to business process consolidation. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 22(2), 11:1–11:42 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Navarro, G.: A guided tour to approximate string matching. ACM Comput. Surv. 33(1), 31–88 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Neto, J.L., et al.: Document clustering and text summarization (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rood, M.A.: Enterprise architecture: definition, content, and utility. In: Proceedings of 3rd IEEE Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, pp. 106–111 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Santana, A., Souza, A., Simon, D., Fischbach, K., De Moura, H.: Network science applied to enterprise architecture analysis: towards the foundational concepts. In: 2017 IEEE 21st International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), pp. 10–19. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Santini, S., Jain, R.: Similarity measures. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 21(9), 871–883 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schoonjans, A.: Social network analysis techniques in enterprise architecture management. Ph.D. thesis, Ghent University (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shani, G., Gunawardana, A.: Evaluating recommendation systems. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 257–297. Springer, Boston, MA (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Sichi, J., Kinable, J., Michail, D., Naveh, B., Contributors: JGraphT - Graph Algorithms and Data Structures in Java (Version 1.1.0) (2017). http://www.jgrapht.org

  21. Simon, D., Fischbach, K.: IT landscape management using network analysis. In: Poels, G. (ed.) CONFENIS 2012. LNBIP, vol. 139, pp. 18–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36611-6_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Tamm, T., Seddon, P., Shanks, G., Reynolds, P.: How does enterprise architecture add value to organisations? Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 28, 141–168 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. The Open Group: TOGAF Version 9.1. Van Haren Publishing, Zaltbommel (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. van der Raadt, B., van Vliet, H.: Designing the enterprise architecture function. In: Becker, S., Plasil, F., Reussner, R. (eds.) QoSA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5281, pp. 103–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87879-7_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Hacks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Borozanov, V., Hacks, S., Silva, N. (2019). Using Machine Learning Techniques for Evaluating the Similarity of Enterprise Architecture Models. In: Giorgini, P., Weber, B. (eds) Advanced Information Systems Engineering. CAiSE 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11483. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21290-2_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21290-2_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21289-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21290-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics