Skip to main content

Application Quantile-Based Risk Measures in Sector Portfolio Analysis—Warsaw Stock Exchange Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Effective Investments on Capital Markets

Abstract

The measurement of financial risk has been one of the main goals of the investors as well as actuaries and insurance practitioners. Measuring the risk of a financial portfolio involves firstly estimating the loss distribution of the portfolio, next computing chosen risk measure. In the resent study, the robustness of risk measurement procedures and their sensitivity into point out for the dataset in present. The results show a gap between the subadditivity and robustness of risk measurement procedures. We apply into analyses alternative risk measurement procedures that possess the robustness property. The quantile-based risk measures have been applied in sector portfolio analysis for the dataset from Warsaw Stock Exchange.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    D ⊂ L is the convex set of cumulative distribution functions (cdf) on R.

  2. 2.

    Huber [12].

  3. 3.

    If C = D, we have qualitative robustness called asymptotic robustness as outlined [12].

  4. 4.

    In other words, while ρ is the risk measure, we are interested in computing.

  5. 5.

    For any 0 < α1 < α2 < 1, we can notice as β = α2 − α1.

  6. 6.

    Kusuoka [15], Song and Yan [17], Dhaene et al. [5], Grigorova [11], Wang et al. [18].

  7. 7.

    Cont et al. [4], Kou et al. [13], Krätschmer et al. [14], and Embrechts et al. [7].

References

  1. Acerbi, C.: Coherent measures of risk in everyday market practice. Quant. Finance 7, 359–364 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Acerbi, C.: Spectral measures of risk: a coherent representation of subjective risk aversion. J. Bank. Finance 26, 1505–1518 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J., Heath, D.: Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9, 203–228 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cont, R., Deguest, R., Scandolo, G.: Robustness and sensitivity analysis of risk measurement procedures. Quant. Finance 10(6), 593–606 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Delbaen, F.: Monetary Utility Functions. Osaka University Press, Osaka (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Embrechts, P., Liu, H., Wang, R.; Quantile-Based Risk Sharing. Working Paper, 24 Oct 2017

    Google Scholar 

  7. Embrechts, P., Wang, B., Wang, R.: Aggregation-robustness and model uncertainty of regulatory risk measures. Finan. Stochast. 19(4), 763–790 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Föllmer, H., Schied, A.: Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Finance Stochast. 6, 429–447 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gourieroux, C., Liu, W.: Sensitivity analysis of distortion risk measures. Working Paper (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gourieroux, C., Laurent, J., Scaillet, O.: Sensitivity analysis of values at risk. J. Empir. Finance 7, 225–245 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grigorova, M.: Stochastic dominance with respect to a capacity and risk measures. Statist. Risk Model. 31(3–4), 259–295 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huber, P.: Robust statistics. Wiley, New York (1981)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Kou, S., Peng, X., Heyde, C.C.: External risk measures and Basel accords. Math. Oper. Res. 38(3), 393–417 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Krätschmer, V., Schied, A., Zähle, H.: Comparative and quantitative robustness for law-invariant risk measures. Finance Stochast 18(2), 271–295 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kusuoka, S.: On law invariant coherent risk measures. Adv. Math. Econ. 3, 83–95 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Richter-Gebert, J., Sturmfels, B., Theobald, T.: First steps in tropical geometry. Contemp. Math. 377, 289–318 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Song, Y., Yan, J.: Risk measures with comonotonic subadditivity or convexity and respecting stochastic orders. Insur. Math. Econ. 45, 459–465 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, R., Bignozzi, V., Tsakanas, A.: How superadditive can a risk measure be? SIAM J. Financ. Math. 6, 776–803 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grażyna Trzpiot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Trzpiot, G. (2019). Application Quantile-Based Risk Measures in Sector Portfolio Analysis—Warsaw Stock Exchange Approach. In: Tarczyński, W., Nermend, K. (eds) Effective Investments on Capital Markets. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21274-2_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics