Skip to main content

Ecophysiology and Phenology: Genetic Resources for Genetic/Genomic Improvement of Narrow-Leafed Lupin

Part of the Compendium of Plant Genomes book series (CPG)

Abstract

The narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) is endemic to coarse-textured neutral to acid sands across the Mediterranean basin, distributed over temperature and rainfall gradients leading to increasing N–S terminal drought. L. angustifolius has a conservative reproductive strategy compared to other Old World species, with relatively early phenology, and a high proportion of physical dormancy in the seed. Nevertheless, appropriate phenology is the key adaptation to the terminal drought stress gradient across the species’ distribution, with flow on effects for water use, stress onset and productivity. Lupins have evolved early phenology in low-rainfall environments of the Mediterranean region, facilitating escape from the annual summer drought, where the opportunity cost of reduced fitness (yield potential) is partially mitigated by higher reproductive investment (harvest index). In high-rainfall environments, ecotypes are later, producing more biomass, leading to greater yield potential, associated with higher water use and earlier stress onset under water deficit. Domesticated lupins were selected for low or no vernalisation requirement in northern Europe and southern Australia, which mimicked the early, drought escape reproductive strategy of low-rainfall ecotypes, but may limit their yield potential in higher rainfall environments of Mediterranean-type environments. Breeding options for later flowering cultivars for long-season environments are constrained by the vernalization response: all late flowering cultivars (lanFTc1) are vernalization-sensitive types and are very late flowering in environments where the vernalisation requirement is not readily satisfied. The mutation efl provided a lower vernalization requirement, but produced unreliable yields. Potentially there are levers for delaying flowering time that may be revealed in phenological studies of wild L. angustifolius. We have discovered alternative alleles at the LanFTc1 locus that varyies in vernalisation-responsiveness, implying that there are other, more subtle phenology regulators to be uncovered in the species.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21270-4_2
  • Chapter length: 12 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-21270-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 2.1

Source Berger et al. (2008)

Fig. 2.2

Source Mousavi-Derazmahalleh et al. (2018)

References

  • ABARES (2012) Australian commodity statistics 2012. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Adhikari KN, Galwey NW, Dracup M (2001) The genetic control of highly restricted branching in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Euphytica 117:261–274

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1982) Register of lupin cultivars (b) Lupinus angustifolius L. (narrow-leafed lupin) cv. Chittick e(Reg. No. b-10). J Aust I Agric Sci 48:122–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger JD, Ludwig C (2014) Contrasting adaptive strategies to terminal drought stress gradients in Mediterranean legumes: phenology, productivity and water relations in wild and domesticated Lupinus luteus L. J Exp Bot 65:6219–6229

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berger JD, Ludwig C, Buirchell BJ (2008) Ecogeography of the old world lupins: characterising the habitat range. In: Palta JABJD (ed) Lupins for health and wealth. Proceedings of the 12th international lupin conference, Fremantle, Western Australia, 14–18 September 2008. International Lupin Association, Canterbury, New Zealand, pp 355–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger JD, Milroy SP, Turner NC, Siddique KHM, Imtiaz M, Malhotra R (2011) Chickpea evolution has selected for contrasting phenological mechanisms among different habitats. Euphytica 180:1–15

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berger JD, Buirchell B, Luckett DJ, Nelson MN (2012a) Domestication bottlenecks limit genetic diversity and constrain adaptation in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Theoret Appl Genet 124:637–652

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berger JD, Buirchell B, Luckett DJ, Palta JA, Ludwig C, Liu D (2012b) How has narrow-leafed lupin changed in its 1st 40 years as an industrial, broad-acre crop? A GxE-based characterization of yield-related traits in Australian cultivars. Field Crop Res 126:152–164

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berger JD, Clements JC, Nelson MN, Kamphuis LG, Singh KB, Buirchell B (2013) The essential role of genetic resources in narrow-leafed lupin improvement. Crop Pasture Sci 64:361–373

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J, Shrestha D, Ludwig C (2017) Reproductive strategies in Mediterranean legumes: trade-offs between phenology, seed size and vigor within and between wild and domesticated Lupinus species collected along aridity gradients. Front Plant Sci 8:548

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berger JD, Ludwig C, Whisson K (2018) Contrasting adaptive strategies to Mediterranean rainfall gradients: phenology, productivity, water–use and stress onset trade-offs in wild and domesticated Lupinus angustifolius L. J Exp Bot 65:6219–6229

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Berger J, Fletcher A, Lawes R, Robertson M (2016) Genotype × environment interactions for phenological adaptation in narrow-leafed lupin: a simulation study with a parameter optimized model. Field Crop Res 197:28–38

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Fletcher A, Lawes R, Berger J, Robertson M (2017) Modelling phenological and agronomic adaptation options for narrow-leafed lupins in the southern grainbelt of Western Australia. Eur J Agron 89:140–147

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen JL, Jørnsgård B, Jørgensen ST, Bibby BM (2008) Photoperiod sensitivity in narrow-leafed lupin (lupinus angustifolius L.). Acta Agric Scand B-S P 58:365–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements J, Cowling W (1994) Patterns of morphological diversity in relation to geographical origins of wild Lupinus angustifolius from the Aegean region. Genet Resour Crop Evol 41:109–122

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling WA (1999) Pedigrees and characteristics of narrow-leafed lupin cultivars released in Australia from 1967 to 1998. Western Australia Department of Agriculture, Bulletin 4365, South Perth, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Dracup M, Kirby EJM (1993) Patterns of growth and development of leaves and internodes of narrow-leafed lupin. Field Crop Res 34:209–225

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dracup M, Kirby EJM (1996) Lupin development guide. University of Western Australia Press, Nedlands, Western Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladstones JS (1970) Lupins as crop plants. Field Crop Abstr 23:123–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladstones JS (1977) The narrow-leafed lupin in Western Australia. Western Australia Department of Agriculture, Bulletin 3990, South Perth, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladstones JS (1994) An historical review of lupins in Australia. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 1st Australian lupin technical symposium, Perth, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladstones JS, Hill GD (1969) Selection for economic characters in Lupinus angustifolius and L. digitatus. 2. Time of flowering. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 9:213–220

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gladstones JS, Crosbie GB (1979) Lupin wild types introduced into Western Australia to 1973. Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Technical Bulletin No. 43, South Perth, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hondelmann W (1984) The Lupin-ancient and modern crop plant. Theoret Appl Genet 68:1–9

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kepel W (1952) The morphological features of the narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius). The Poznań Society of Friends of Science, Department of Mathematical and Natural Sciences Publication of the Section of Agriculture and Sylviculture 1:182–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Landers KF (1995) Vernalization responses in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) genotypes. Aust J Agric Res 46:1011–1025

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lema M, Santalla M, Rodiñno AP, De Ron AM (2005) Field performance of natural narrow-leafed lupin from the northwestern Spain. Euphytica 144:341–351

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mikołajczyk J (1963) Inheritance of the growth pattern in Lupinus angustifolius L. and species hybrids L. angustifolius x L. linifolius. Genet Pol 4:139–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikołajczyk J (1966) Genetic studies in Lupinus angustifolius. Part. III. Inheritance of the alkaloid content, seed hardness and length of the growing season in blue lupin. Genet Pol 7:181–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi-Derazmahalleh M et al (2018) Exploring the genetic and adaptive diversity of a pan-Mediterranean crop wild relative: narrow-leafed lupin. Theoret Appl Genet 131:887–901

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Oram RN (2002) Two reduced branching mutants in Lupinus angustifolius L. SABRAO J Breed Genet 34:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry MW, Poole ML (1975) Field environment studies on lupins.1. Developmental patterns in Lupinus angustifolius L., the effects of cultivar, site and planting time. Aust J Agric Res 26:81–91

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MS, Gladstones JS (1972) Control of lupin initiation by vernalization, photoperiod and temperature under controlled envrionment. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 12:638–645

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MS, Gladstones JS (1974) Effects of temperature and photoperiod on flowering and yield components of lupin genotypes in the field. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 14:205–213

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Reader MA, Dracup M, Kirby EJM (1995) Time to flowering in narrow-leafed lupin. Aust J Agric Res 46:1063–1077

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanova KT, Buirchell B (2010) Multiplicative mixed models for genetic gain assessment in lupin breeding. Crop Sci 50:880–891

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Święcicki W, Święcicki WK (1995) Domestication and breeding improvement of narrow-leafed lupin (L. angustifolius L.). J Applied Genet 36:155–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Talhinhas P, Leitão J, Neves-Martins J (2006) Collection of Lupinus angustifolius L. germplasm and characterisation of morphological and molecular diversity. Genet Resour Crop Ev 53:563–578

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CM et al (2019) INDEL variation in the regulatory region of the major flowering time gene LanFTc1 is associated with vernalisaiton response and flowering time in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Plant Cell Environ 42:174–187

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens D. Berger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Taylor, C.M., Kamphuis, L.G., Cowling, W.A., Nelson, M.N., Berger, J.D. (2020). Ecophysiology and Phenology: Genetic Resources for Genetic/Genomic Improvement of Narrow-Leafed Lupin. In: Singh, K., Kamphuis, L., Nelson, M. (eds) The Lupin Genome. Compendium of Plant Genomes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21270-4_2

Download citation