Skip to main content

A Two-Stage Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment Model for Sustainability Evaluation of Small Hydropower

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 902 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1001))

Abstract

China has the most technically utilizable small hydropower around the world. The government have taken the policies of efficiency improvement, capacity expansion, refurbishment and value added to implement the 40% potentials and over 47,000 existing stations. Researching on the sustainability of SHP could provide an approach to determine whether the designed SHP is sustainable and how it can be developed. Therefore, a sustainability evaluation index system with three grade indicators was firstly proposed to illustrate what a sustainable SHP should considered. Then a two-stage comprehensive assessment model was used to solve the multi factorial evaluation problem. Lastly, the sustainability evaluation of eight cascade SHP stations were conducted using the proposed method, and the development subsequence and policy was given according to the calculated ranks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Afgan, N.H., Carvalho, M.D.G.: Energy system assessment with sustainability indicators. Energy Policy 28(9), 603–612 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. ICSHP: 2016 The world small hydropower development report 2016. Technical report, United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna, and International Center on Small Hydro Power, Hangzhou (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. IHA: Hydropower sustainability assessment protocol. Technical report, International Hydropower Association (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. IHA: 2014 hydropower status report. Technical report, International Hydropower Association (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jt, Klimpt, Rivero, C., Puranen, H., Koch, F.: Recommendations for sustainable hydroelectric development. Energy Policy 30(14), 1305–1312 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar, D., Katoch, S.S.: Sustainability assessment and ranking of run of the river(ror) hydropower projects using analytical hierarchy process(ahp):a study from western himalayan region of india. J. Mt. Sci. 12(5), 1315–1333 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, D., Ou, C., Ye, M.: Introduction to the green assessment criteria on small hydropower station. China Water Power Electrification 9, 7–12 (2015). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. MWR (2017) Standard for rank classification and flood protection criteria of water and hydropower projects (sl 252–2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosso, M., Bottero, M., Pomarico, S., Ferlita, S.L., Comino, E.: Integrating multicriteria evaluation and stakeholders analysis for assessing hydropower projects. Energy Policy 67(4), 870–881 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thuong, N.T.H., Zhang, R., Li, Z., Hong, P.T.D.: Multi-criteria evaluation of financial statement quality based on hesitant fuzzy judgments with assessing attitude. Int. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Manag. 13(4), 254–264 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vera, I., Langlois, L.: Energy indicators for sustainable development. Energy 32(6), 875–882 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, L., Vu Thi, V., Ma, Z.: Research on green small hydropower comprehensive assessment. J. China Inst. Water Resour. Hydropower Res. 14(4), 291–296 (2016). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xu, J., Ni, T.: Integrated technological paradigm-based soft paths towards sustainable development of small hydropower. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 70, 623–634 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu, J., Ni, T., Zheng, B.: Hydropower development trends from a technological paradigm perspective. Energy Convers. Manag. 90, 195–206 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by the Research Center for Systems Science & Enterprise Development, Key Research of Social Sciences Base of Sichuan Province (Grant No. Xq17B05), and the Scientific Research Staring Foundation, Chengdu University of Technology (Grant No. 10900-KYQD-10201606691). The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their insightful comments and suggestions to improve this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ting Ni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ni, T., Shi, L., Wen, H. (2020). A Two-Stage Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment Model for Sustainability Evaluation of Small Hydropower. In: Xu, J., Ahmed, S., Cooke, F., Duca, G. (eds) Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. ICMSEM 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1001. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21248-3_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics