Skip to main content

On Some Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Their Connection to Graphical Methods with Uncensored and Censored Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management (ICMSEM 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1001))

Abstract

In this work, we present goodness-of-fit tests related to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Michael statistics and connect them to graphical methods with uncensored and censored data. The Anderson-Darling test is often empirically more powerful than the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. However, the former one cannot be related to graphical tools by means of probability plots, as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test does. The Michael test is, in some cases, more powerful than the Anderson-Darling and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests and can also be related to probability plots. We consider the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Michael tests for detecting whether any distribution is suitable or not to model censored or uncensored data. We conduct numerical studies to show the performance of these tests and the corresponding graphical tools. Some comments related to big data and lifetime analysis, under the context of this study, are provided in the conclusions of this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Athayde, E., Azevedo, C., Barros, M., Leiva, V.: Failure rate of Birnbaum-Saunders distributions: shape, change-point, estimation and robustness. Braz. J. Probab. Stat. 33, 301–328 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Azevedo, C., Leiva, V., Athayde, E., Balakrishnan, N.: Shape and change point analyses of the Birnbaum-Saunders-t hazard rate and associated estimation. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 56, 3887–3897 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Aykroyd, R.G., Leiva, V., Ruggeri, F.: Recent developments of control charts, identification of big data sources and future trends of current research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change (pages in press) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balakrishnan, N., Ng, H., Kannan, N.: Goodness-of-fit tests based on spacings for progressively type-II censored data from a general location-scale distribution. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 53, 349–356 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barros, M., Leiva, V., Ospina, R., Tsuyuguchi, A.: Goodness-of-fit tests for the Birnbaum-Saunders distribution with censored reliability data. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 63, 543–554 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Castillo, J., Puig, P.: Testing departures from gamma, Rayleigh, and truncated normal distributions. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 49, 255–269 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Castro-Kuriss, C.: On a goodness-of-fit test for censored data from a location-scale distribution with application. Chil. J. Stat. 37, 115–136 (2011)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Castro-Kuriss, C., Kelmansky, D., Leiva, V., Martinez, E.: A new goodness-of-fit test for censored data with an application in monitoring processes. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 38, 1161–1177 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Castro-Kuriss, C., Kelmansky, D., Leiva, V., Martinez, E.: On a goodness-of-fit test for normality with unknown parameters and type-II censored data. J. Appl. Stat. 37, 1193–1211 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Castro-Kuriss, C., Leiva, V., Athayde, E.: Graphical tools to assess goodness-of-fit in non-location-scale distributions. Colomb. J. Stat. 37, 341–365 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, G., Balakrishnan, N.: A general purpose approximate goodness-of-fit test. J. Qual. Technol. 27, 154–161 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Agostino, C., Stephens, M.: Goodness of Fit Techniques. Marcel Dekker and Routledge, New York (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. DePriest, D.: Using the singly truncated normal distribution to analyse satellite data. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 12, 263–272 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leiva, V.: The Birnbaum-Saunders distribution. Academic Press, New York (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Meeker, W.Q., Escobar, L.A.: Statistical Methods for Reliability Data. Wiley, New York (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Feuerverger, A.: On goodness of fit for operational risk. Int. Stat. Rev. 84, 434–455 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldmann, C., Klar, B., Meintanis, S.G.: Data transformations and goodness-of-fit tests for type-II right censored samples. Metrika 78, 59–83 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Lawless, J.: Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data. Wiley, New York (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Leiva, V., Ponce, M., Marchant, C., Bustos, O.: Fatigue statistical distributions useful for modeling diameter and mortality of trees. Colomb. J. Stat. 35, 349–367 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Leiva, V., Rojas, E., Galea, M., Sanhueza, A.: Diagnostics in Birnbaum-Saunders accelerated life models with an application to fatigue data. Appl. Stoch. Model. Bus. Ind. 30, 115–131 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin, C., Huang, Y., Balakrishnan, N.: A new method for goodness-of-fit testing based on type-II right censored samples. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 57, 633–642 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Meatless, M., Rousseeuw, P.J., Croux, C., et al.: robustbase: Basic Robust Statistics. R package version 0.93-3 (2018). http://robustbase.r-forge.r-project.org

  23. Marden, J.: Positions and QQ-plots. Stat. Sci. 19, 606–614 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Michael, J.: The stabilized probability plot. Biometrika 70, 11–17 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Pakyari, R., Balakrishnan, N.: A general purpose approximate goodness-of-fit test for progressively type-II censored data. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 61, 238–244 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rad, A., Yousefzadeh, F., Balakrishnan, N.: Goodness-of-fit test based on Kullback-Leibler information for progressively type-II censored data. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 60, 570–579 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the editors and reviewers for their comments on this manuscript. This research work was partially supported by FONDECYT 1160868 grant from the Chilean government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Castro-Kuriss, C., Huerta, M., Leiva, V., Tapia, A. (2020). On Some Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Their Connection to Graphical Methods with Uncensored and Censored Data. In: Xu, J., Ahmed, S., Cooke, F., Duca, G. (eds) Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. ICMSEM 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1001. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21248-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics