Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nasal Provocation Tests

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
All Around the Nose

  • 123 Accesses

Abstract

Nasal provocation test (NPT) with allergens is a safe and simple technique recommended in different diagnostic and research settings. NPT is mostly used for diagnostic purposes in cases where patient’s symptoms do not agree with the results of skin or blood testing. Also, it has an important role in clinical trials. It is a test that can be used in routine clinical practice although must be conducted by properly trained personnel. Inhaled allergens have been epidemiologically determined as a significant factor leading to allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma. Imitating the natural process, NPT allows gaining insights into how allergic respiratory inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) work. In the research field, NPT has been widely used in the study of mechanisms of inflammation and allergic response in subjects with allergic rhinitis (AR) and local allergic rhinitis (LAR), in the study of pathophysiological mechanisms of response allergens, and to evaluate the therapeutic effect of drugs or immunotherapy in controlled clinical trials. Daily clinical application of NPT as a method to recreate the nasal allergic reactions and to study the AR characteristics regarding its pathophysiology, immunology, and pharmacology became popular. As a method to determine the clinical role of allergens in patients with multiple sensitizations, NPT is suggested to validate AR diagnosis. In addition, NPT is recommended in case of inconsistencies or hardships between a patient’s medical history and the skin and/or blood serum test results. This chapter develops the most relevant aspects concerning NPT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gendo K, Larson EB. Evidence-based diagnostic strategies for evaluating suspected allergic rhinitis. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(4):278–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sheikh J. Allergic rhinitis workup. In: Kaliner MA, editor. Medscape. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/134825-workup#c6 Accessed online 16 Jan 2016.

  3. Blackley C. Experimental researches on the causes and nature of catarrhus aestivus. London: Balliere, Tindall & Cox; 1873.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aschan G, Drettner B. Nasal obstruction at provocation experiments in patients with hay-fever. Acta Otolaryngol. 1958;140:91–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bachert C, Gonsior E, Berdel D. Richtlinien für die durchfürung von nasalen Provokationen mit Allergen bei Erkrangungen der oberen Luftwege. Allergologie. 1990;13:53–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Druce HM, Schumacher MJ. Nasal provocation challenge. The Committee on Upper Airway Allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1990;86:261–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schumacher MJ. Nasal provocation test. Rhinology. 1992;14:242–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lund VJ, Aaronson D, Bousquet J, Dahl R, Davies RJ, Durham SR, et al. International Consensus Report on the diagnosis and management of rhinitis. International Rhinitis Management Working Group. Allergy. 1994;49(Suppl 19):1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Melillo G, Bonini S, Cocco G, Davies RJ, de Monchy JGR, Frolund L, Pelikan Z. EAACI provocation tests with allergens. Report prepared by the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology Subcommittee on provocation tests with allergens. Allergy. 1997;52(Suppl 35):1–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Malm L, Gerth Van Wijk R, Bachert C. Guidelines for nasal provocations with aspects on nasal patency, airflow, and airflow resistance. International Committee on Objective Assessment of the Nasal Airways, International Rhinologic Society. Rhinology. 2000;38:1–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Litvyakova LI, Baraniuk JN. Nasal provocation testing: a review. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001;86:355–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Litvyakova LI, Baraniuk JN. Human nasal allergen provocation for determination of true allergic rhinitis: methods for clinicians. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2002;2:194–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gosepath J, Amedee RG, Mann WJ. Nasal provocation testing as an international standard for evaluation of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. Laryngoscope. 2005;115:512–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bousquet J, Khaltaev N, Cruz AA, Denburg J, Fokkens WJ, Togias A, et al. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) 2008 update. Allergy. 2008;63(Suppl 86):8–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dordal MT, Lluch-Bernal M, Sánchez MC, Rondón C, Navarro A, Montoro J, et al. Allergen-specific nasal provocation testing: review by the Rhinoconjunctivitis Committee of the Spanish Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21(1):1–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Valero Santiago A, Amat Par P, Sanosa Valls J, Sierra Martínez P, Malet Casajuana A, García Calderón PA. Hypersensitivity to wheat flour in bakers. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1988;16(5):309–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Desrosiers M, Nguyen B, Ghezzo H, Leblanc C, Malo JL. Nasal response in subjects undergoing challenges by inhaling occupational agents causing asthma through the nose and mouth. Allergy. 1998;53:840–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Airaksinen L, Tuomi T, Vanhanen M, Voutilainen R, Toskala E. Use of nasal provocation test in the diagnostics of occupational rhinitis. Rhinology. 2007;45:40–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hytonen M, Sala E. Nasal provocation test in the diagnosis of occupational allergic rhinitis. Rhinology. 1996;34:86–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gorski P, Krakowiak A, Pazdrak K, Palczynski C, Ruta U, Walusiak J. Nasal challenge test in the diagnosis of allergic respiratory diseases in subjects occupationally exposed to a high molecular allergen (flour). Occup Med (Lond). 1998;48:91–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lavasa S, Kumar L, Kaushal SC, Ganguli NK. Wheat threshing dust—a “new allergen” in April-May nasobronchial allergy. Indian Pediatr. 1996;33:566–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Passalacqua G, Albano M, Pronzato C, Riccio AM, Scordamaglia A, Falagiani P, et al. Long-term follow-up of nasal immunotherapy to Parietaria: clinical and local immunological effects. Clin Exp Allergy. 1997;27:904–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Braunstahl GJ. In vivo allergy diagnosis-nasal and bronchial provocation tests. In: Akdis CA, Agache I, editors. Global atlas of allergy. Part 2a. Published by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; 2014. p. 153–5. www.eaaci.org; http://www.eaaci.org/resources/global-atlas-of-allergy.html.

  24. Sanico AM, Philip G, Proud D, Naclerio RM, Togias A. Comparison of nasal mucosal responsiveness to neuronal stimulation in non-allergic and allergic rhinitis: effects of capsaicin nasal challenge. Clin Exp Allergy. 1998;28:92–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tantilipikorn P, Vichyanond P, Lacroix JS. Nasal provocation test: how to maximize its clinical use? Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2010;28:225–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cimarra M, Robledo T. Aplicación en provocación nasal específi ca. In: Valero A, Fabra JM, Márquez F, Orus C, Picado C, Sastre J, Sierra JI, editors. Manual de rinomanometríaacústica. Barcelona: MRA Médica; 2001. p. 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yuta A, Doyle WJ, Gaumond E, Ali M, Tamarkin L, Baraniuk JN, Van Deusen M, Cohen S, Skoner DP. Rhinovirus infection induces mucus hypersecretion. Am J Phys. 1998;274(6 Pt 1):L1017–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Solomon WR. Nasal provocation testing. In: Spector SL, editor. Provocation testing in clinical practice, vol. 5. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1995. p. 647–92.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Terrien MH, Rahm F, Fellrath JM, Spertini F. Comparison of the effects of terfenadine with fexofenadine on nasal provocation tests with allergen. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103:1025–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Valero AL, Picado C. Pruebas de provocación nasal específi cas. In: Valero AL, Fabra JM, Márquez F, Orús C, Picado C, Sastre J, Sierra JI, editors. Manual de rinometría acústica. Barcelona: MRA Médica; 2000. p. 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Meltzer E, Schatz M, Zeiger R. Allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. In: Middleton E, editor. Middleton’s allergy principles and practice. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993. p. 1253–88.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pastorello EA, Riario-Sforza GG, Incorvaia C, Segala M, Fumagalli M, Gandini R. Comparison of rhinomanometry, symptom score and inflammatory cell counts in assessing the nasal late phase reaction to allergen challenge. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1994;93:85–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Chusakul S, Phannaso C, Sangsarsri S, Aeumjaturapat S, Snidvongs K. House-dust mite nasal provocation: a diagnostic tool in perennial rhinitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010;24:133–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pulmonology, Medical Faculty, Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir, Turkey

    Duygu Zorlu

  2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Faculty, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey

    Nuray Bayar Muluk

  3. Allergy Unit, IBIMA-Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, ARADyAL, Madrid, Spain

    Paloma Campo

Authors
  1. Duygu Zorlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nuray Bayar Muluk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paloma Campo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Medical Faculty, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eskisehir, Turkey

    Cemal Cingi

  2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Faculty, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey

    Nuray Bayar Muluk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zorlu, D., Bayar Muluk, N., Campo, P. (2020). Nasal Provocation Tests. In: Cingi, C., Bayar Muluk, N. (eds) All Around the Nose. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21217-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21217-9_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21216-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21217-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation