Advertisement

Carbon Capture and Storage: Most Efficient Technologies for Greenhouse Emissions Abatement

  • Pasquale Cavaliere
Chapter
  • 498 Downloads

Abstract

Steel production is a very energy-intensive process, and it requires large amounts of natural resources. In fact, energy costs account for up to 40% of the total cost in some countries. Therefore, optimizing process efficiency is one of the most effective ways to reduce energy consumption and lower costs, with the added benefit of reducing the steel industry’s impact on the environment. Iron and steel industry is the main CO2 emitter among the most CO2-intensive industrial sectors. The iron and steel industry accounts for about 19% of final energy use and about a quarter of direct CO2 emissions from the industry sector. The CO2 relevance is high due to a large share of coal in the energy mix. Unlike power plants, where CO2 is emitted from a single source, an integrated steel mill has multiple sources of CO2. The emissions are located at several stacks and occur from start to end of the iron and steel production. CCS is one of the most open fields for the reduction of greenhouse emissions in primary steelmaking. It is necessary for continuing to use fossil fuels. In the iron and steel industry, CCS faces many uncertainties regarding cost, efficiency, and technology choice. Obviously many solutions are under investigation to capture CO2 and to store it avoiding its emission in the atmosphere. Selection of capture equipment will depend on factors including CO2 capture rate, possible requirements for secondary gas treatment, energy consumption, reliability, and operational and capital costs. In the present chapter, the most innovative solutions related to energetic issues and off-gases type are described. The gas utilization depending on the plant section source and composition is underlined. The CO2 abatement potential and the various solutions costs are indicated.

Keywords

CCS CCU Energy efficiency Abatement potential Costs 

References

  1. Adanez J, Abad A, Garcia-Labiano F, Gayan P, De Diego LF (2012) Progress in chemical-looping combustion and reforming technologies. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38(2):215–282.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2011.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Air Products (2011) BF Plus offers steelmakers the complete package … lower costs, improved iron-making productivity and a cleaner environment. Available from: www.airproducts.com/blastfurnace Allentown, PA, USA
  3. Arasto A, Tsupare E, Karki J, Pisila E, Sorsamaki L (2013) Post-combustion capture of CO2 at an integrated steel mill – part I: technical concept analysis. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 16:271–277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.08.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arasto A, Tsupari E, Karki J, Lilja J, Sihvonen M (2014) Oxygen blast furnace with CO2 capture and storage at an integrated steel mill—part I: technical concept analysis. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 30:140–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ariyama T, Takahashi K, Kawashiri Y, Nouchi T (2019) Diversification of the ironmaking process toward the long-term global goal for carbon dioxide mitigation. J Sustain Metall.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-019-00219-9
  6. Arnaiz del Pozo C, Cloete S, Cloete JH, Alvaro AJ, Amini S (2019) The potential of chemical looping combustion using the gas switching concept to eliminate the energy penalty of CO2 capture. Int J Greenhous gas Contrl 83:265–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.01.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Azimi B, Tahmasebpoor M, Sanchez-Jimenez PE, Perejon A, Valverde JM (2019) Multicycle CO2 capture activity and fluidizability of Al-based synthesized CaO sorbents. Chem Eng J 358:679–690.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bains P, Psarras P, Wilcox J (2017) CO2 capture from the industry sector. Prog Energy Combust Sci 63:146–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bermudez JM, Arenillas A, Luque R, Menendez JA (2013) An overview of novel technologies to valorise coke oven gas surplus. Fuel Precess Technol 110:150–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.12.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Birat J-P (2010a) Steel sectoral report. Contribution to the UNIDO roadmap on CCS—fifth draftGoogle Scholar
  11. Birat J-P (2010b) Carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and storage technology in the iron and steel industry. In: Developments and innovation in carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and storage technology, vol 1: carbon dioxide (CO2) capture, transport and industrial applications. Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Blamey J, Anthony EJ, Wang J, Fennell PS (2010) The calcium looping cycle for large-scale CO2 capture. Prog Energy Combust Sci 36(2):260–279.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2009.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bui M, Adjiman CS, Bardow A, Anthony EJ, Boston A, Brown S, Fennell PS, Fuss S, Galindo A, Hackett LA, Hallett JP, Herzog HJ, Jackson G, Kemper J, Krevor S, Maitland GC, Matuszewski M, Metcalfe IS, Petit C, Puxty G, Reimer J, Reiner DM, Rubin ES, Scott SA, Shah N, Smit B, Trusler JPM, Webley P, Wilcox J, Mac Dowell N (2018) Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward. Energy Environ Sci 11(5):1062–1176.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ee02342aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cavaliere P (2016) Ironmaking and steelmaking processes: greenhouse emissions, control, and reduction.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39529-6Google Scholar
  15. Chen L, Yang B, Shen X, Xie Z, Sun F (2015) Thermodynamic optimization opportunities for the recovery and utilization of residual energy and heat in China's iron and steel industry: a case study. Appl Therm Eng 86:151–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.04.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheng H-H, Shen J-F, Tan C-S (2010) CO2 capture from hot stove gas in steel making process. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 4(3):525–531.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.12.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chisalita D-A, Petrescu L, Cobden P, van Dijk HAJE, Cormos A-M, Cormos C-C (2019) Assessing the environmental impact of an integrated steel mill with post-combustion CO2 capture and storage using the LCA methodology. J Clean Prod 211:1015–1025.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chowdhury JI, Hu Y, Haltas I, Balta-Ozkan N, Matthew G Jr, Varga L (2018) Reducing industrial energy demand in the UK: a review of energy efficiency technologies and energy saving potential in selected sectors. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 94:1153–1178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cormos CC (2016) Evaluation of reactive absorption and adsorption systems for post-combustion CO2 capture applied to iron and steel industry. Appl Therm Eng 105:56–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.05.149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Danloy G, Berthelemot A, Grant M et al (2009) ULCOS - pilot testing of the low-CO2 blast furnace process at the experimental BF in Luleå. Revue de Metallurgie - Cahiers d’Informations Techniques 106(1):1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1051/metal/2009008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davidson R M (2007) Post-combustion carbon capture from coal fired plants - solvent scrubbing. IEA Clean Coal Centre, CCC/125, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Delasalle F (2019) Steel in the global value chain and in the circular economy. Steel and coal: a new perspective, Bruxelles, 28 Mar 2019Google Scholar
  23. Dong K, Wang X (2019) CO2 utilization in the ironmaking and steelmaking process. Metals 9:273.  https://doi.org/10.3390/met9030273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghanbari H, Helle M, Saxen H (2012) Process integration of steelmaking and methanol production for suppressing CO2 emissions—a study of different auxiliary fuels. Chem Eng Process 61:58–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2012.06.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gielen D (2003) CO2 removal in the iron and steel industry. Energy Convers Manag 44:1027–1037.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(02)00111-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ho MT, Allinson GW, Wiley DE (2011) Comparison of MEA capture cost for low CO2 emissions sources in Australia. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 5(1):49–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ho MT, Bustamante A, Wiley DE (2013) Comparison of CO2capture economics for iron and steel mills. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 19:145–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holappa LEK (2017) Energy efficiency and sustainability in steel production. Minerals, metals and materials series 9783319510903, pp 401–410.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51091-0_39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holmes G, Keith DW (2016) An air–liquid contactor for large-scale capture of CO2 from air. Philos Trans R Soc 370:4380–4403.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holmes G, Nold K, Walsh T, Heidel K, Henderson MA, Ritchie J, Klavins P, Singh H, Keith DW (2013) Outdoor prototype results for direct atmospheric capture of carbon dioxide. Energy Procedia 37:6079–6095.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. IEA (2007) Tracking industrial energy efficiency and CO2 emissionsGoogle Scholar
  32. Keith DW, Holmes G, St. Angelo D, Heidel K (2018) A process for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere. Joule.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Khallaghi N, Hanak DP, Manovic V (2019) Staged oxy-fuel natural gas combined cycle. Appl Therm Eng 153:761–767.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.03.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koytsoumpa EI, Bergins C, Kakaras E (2018) The CO2 economy: review of CO2 capture and reuse technologies. J Supercrit Fluids 132:3–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.07.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kunzler C, Alves N, Pereira E, Nienczewski J, Ligabue R, Einloft S, Dullius J (2011) CO2 storage with indirect carbonation using industrial waste. Energy Procedia 4:1010–1017.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kuramochi T, Ramírez A, Turkenburg W, Faaij A (2011) Techno-economic assessment and comparison of CO2 capture technologies for industrial processes: preliminary results for the iron and steel sector. Energy Procedia 4:1981–1988.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuramochi T, Ramírez A, Turkenburg W, Faaij A (2013) Comparative assessment of CO2 capture technologies for carbon-intensive industrial processes. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38:87–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2011.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lampert K, Ziebik A (2007) Comparative analysis of energy requirements of CO2 removal from metallurgical fuel gases. Energy 32:521–527.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lampert K, Ziebik A, Stanek W (2010) Thermoeconomical analysis of CO2 removal from the Corex export gas and its integration with the blast-furnace assembly and metallurgical combined heat and power (CHP) plant. Energy (Oxford) 35(2):1188–1195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.05.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lie JA, Vassbotn T, Hägg M-B, Grainger D, Kim T-J, Mejdell T (2007) Optimization of a membrane process for CO2 capture in the steelmaking industry. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 1(3):309–317.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00069-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lucas N, Rossetti di Valdalbero D (2018) Energy in future steelmaking, steel in the energy market applications, greening European steel. European steel, the wind of change, Bruxelles, 31 Jan 2018Google Scholar
  42. Man Y, Yang S, Xiang D, Li X, Quian Y (2014) Environmental impact and techno-economic analysis of the coal gasification process with/without CO2 capture. J Clean Prod 71:59–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mandova H, Gale WF, Williams A, Heyes AL, Hodgson P, Miah KH (2018) Global assessment of biomass suitability for ironmaking – opportunities for co-location of sustainable biomass, iron and steel production and supportive policies. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 27:23–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2018.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mandova H, Patrizio P, Leduc S, Kjärstad J, Wang C, Wetterlund E, Kraxner F, Gale W (2019) Achieving carbon-neutral iron and steelmaking in Europe through the deployment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. J Clean Prod 218:118–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martínez I, Fernández JR, Abanades JC, Romano MC (2018) Integration of a fluidised bed ca–cu chemical looping process in a steel mill. Energy 163:570–584.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pérez-Fortes M, Moya MJA, Vatopoulos K, Tzimas E (2014) CO2 capture and utilization in cement and iron and steel industries. Energy Procedia 63:6534–6543.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ramírez-Santos ÁA, Castel C, Favre E (2018) A review of gas separation technologies within emission reduction programs in the iron and steel sector: current application and development perspectives. Sep Purif Technol 194:425–442.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.11.063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rhee CH, Kim JY, Han K, Ahn CK, Chun HD (2011) Process analysis for ammonia-based CO2 capture in ironmaking industry. Energy Procedia 4:1486–1493.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Richards V L, Peaslee K, Smith J D (2008) Geological sequestration of CO2 by hydrous carbonate formation with reclaimed slag. Office of Scientific and Technical Information, TRP 9955, Oak Ridge, TNGoogle Scholar
  50. Riley M F, Rosen L, Drnevich R (2009) Mitigating CO2 emissions in the steel industry: a regional approach to a global need. In: AISTech 2009, proceedings of the iron and steel technology conference, St. Louis, MO, USA, 4–7 May 2009, vol 1. Association for Iron and Steel Technology (AIST), Warrendale, PA, pp 89–101Google Scholar
  51. Rogala T (2019) European coal – technological and socio-economic challenges. Steel and coal: a new perspective, Bruxelles 28 Mar 2019Google Scholar
  52. Shimizu T, Hirama T, Hosoda H, Kitano K, Inagaki M, Tejima K (1999) A twin fluid-bed reactor for removal of CO2 from combustion processes. Chem Eng Res Des 77(1):62–68.  https://doi.org/10.1205/026387699525882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sun L, Smith R (2013) Rectisol wash process simulation and analysis. J Clean Prod 39:321–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Suopajarvi H, Kemppainen A, Haapakangas J, Fabritius T (2017) Extensive review of the opportunities to use biomass-based fuels in iron and steelmaking processes. J Clean Prod 148:709–734.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tian S, Jiang J, Zhang Z, Manovic V (2018) Inherent potential of steelmaking to contribute to decarbonisation targets via industrial carbon capture and storage. Nat Commun 9(1):4422.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06886-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Treadgold C (2015) Opportunities for adding value to Tata Steels works arising gases. Tata Steel, IJmuidenGoogle Scholar
  57. Tsupari E, Karki J, Arasto A, Pisila E (2013) Post-combustion capture of CO2 at an integrated steel mill – part II: economic feasibility. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 16:278–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.08.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tsupari E, Karki J, Arasto A, Lilja J, Kinnunen K, Sihvonen M (2015) Oxygen blast furnace with CO2 capture and storage at an integrated steel mill – part II: economic feasibility in comparison with conventional blast furnace highlighting sensitivities. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 32:189–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tzirakis F, Tsivintzelis I, Papadopoulos AI, Seferlis P (2019) Experimental measurement and assessment of equilibrium behaviour for phase change solvents used in CO 2 capture. Chem Eng Sci:20–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2018.12.045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. van der Stel J, Hirsch A, Janhsen U, Sert D, Grant M, Delebecque A, Diez-Brea P, Adam J, Ansseau O, Feiterna A, Lin R, Zagaria AM, Küttner W, Schott R, Eklund N, Pettersson M, Boden A, Sköld B-E, Sundqvist L, Simoes J-P, Edberg N, Lövgren J, Bürgler T, Feilmayr C, Sihvonen M, Kerkkonen O, Babich A, Born S (2014) ULCOS top gas recycling blast furnace process (ULCOS TGRBF). Research fund for coal and steel (EC), EUR 26414, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  61. van Dijk HAJ, Cobden PD, Lundqvist M, Cormos CC, Watson MJ, Manzolini G, van der Veer S, Mancuso L, Johns J, Sundelin B (2017) Cost effective CO2 reduction in the Iron & Steel Industry by means of the SEWGS technology: STEPWISE project. Energy Procedia 114:6256–6265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vlek M (2007) Feasibility study of CO2 capture and storage at a power plant fired on production gas of the steel industry. Master thesis, Department of Technology Management, Eindhoven University of Technology, EindhovenGoogle Scholar
  63. Wiley DE, Ho MT, Bustamante A (2011) Assessment of opportunities for CO2 capture at iron and steel mills: an Australian perspective. Energy Procedia 4:2654–2661.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yi W, Wu G-S, Gong M-H, Huang Y, Feng J, Hao Y-H, Li WY (2017) A feasibility study for CO2 recycle assistance with coke oven gas to synthetic natural gas. Appl Energy 193:149–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yildirim O, Nölker K, Büker K, Kleinschmidt R (2018) Chemical conversion of steel mill gases to urea: an analysis of plant capacity. Chemie-Ingenieur-Technik 90(10):1529–1535.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201800019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yoon Y, Nam S, Jung S, Kim Y (2011) K2CO3/hindered cyclic amine blend (SEFY-1) as a solvent for CO2 capture from various industries. Energy Procedia 4:267–272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.051CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pasquale Cavaliere
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Innovation EngineeringUniversity of SalentoLecceItaly

Personalised recommendations