Advertisement

Direct Reduced Iron: Most Efficient Technologies for Greenhouse Emissions Abatement

  • Pasquale Cavaliere
Chapter

Abstract

The global needing for greenhouse emissions and energy consumption reduction led, in the recent past, to the increased scientific and industrial interest in the development of technologies allowing to produce direct reduced iron. DRI is produced through the removal (reduction) of oxygen from iron ore in its solid state. This technology encompasses various processes based on different feedstocks, reactors, and reducing agents. DRI processes can reduce CO2 emissions by using natural gas instead of coal due to the replacement of carbon reductant by hydrogen from the methane. Many complementary gasification processes have been developed in order to synthesize the reducing atmospheres. Depending on the processing route, a metallization in the order of 95% with a carbon content in the range 0.5–4% is obtained. The 75% of DRI or HBI is produced with processes based on natural gas as energy resource, which has to be converted by gas reforming technology to reducing gases (CO and H2) for the reduction of iron oxide to metallic iron. In the present chapter, the different plant layouts are described. The effect of raw materials properties on the sponge iron quality is underlined. The installation of DRI plants as a function of the natural resources availability is discussed. The DRI/scrap processing in EAFs is described in the chapter. The employment of DRI in EAF steelmaking or in BF operations is described. The most recent solutions regarding the hydrogen reduction by employing reducing agents produced via innovative routes such as water electrolysis are shown. The diffusion of such plants basing on energetic and economic issues is largely discussed in the chapter.

Keywords

DRI NG Sponge iron Hydrogen reduction Water electrolysis 

References

  1. Abel M, Hein M, Böhm C, Sterrer W, Vaillancourt D (2014) Solutions for the increased usage of DRI in the electric arc furnace. In: AISTech - iron and steel technology conference proceedings, pp 997–1006Google Scholar
  2. Ahmad JK (2010) Using water hydrogen instead of reducing gas in the production of direct reduced iron (DRI). J Adv Oxid Technol 13(1):124–129.  https://doi.org/10.1515/jaots-2010-0116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arens M, Worrell E, Eichhammer W, Hasanbeigi A, Zhang Q (2017) Pathways to a low-carbon iron and steel industry in the medium-term-the case of Germany. J Clean Prod 163:84–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldock R, Laumann M.D, Nepper J-P, Stefan T (2012) Outotec’s innovative technologies for direct reduction and smelting reduction of ferrous raw materials. In: 6th international congress on the science and technology of ironmaking 2012, ICSTI 2012 - including proceedings from the 42nd ironmaking and raw materials seminar, and the 13th Brazilian symposium on iron ore, vol 4, pp 2553–2562Google Scholar
  5. Berger H (2017) Development ways of the iron and steel industry. Chernye Metally 5:71–76Google Scholar
  6. Bolen J (2017) Historical operating cost comparison for north American iron and steelmaking routes. In: AISTech - iron and steel technology conference proceedings, pp 1027–1034Google Scholar
  7. Breault RW (2010) Gasification processes old and new: a basic review of the major technologies. Energies 3(2):216–240.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en3020216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter AM (2004) Use of coal in direct ironmaking processes. CCC/88. IEA Clean Coal Centre, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavaliere P (2016) Ironmaking and steelmaking processes: greenhouse emissions, control, and reduction. Springer, Cham.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39529-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheeley R, Leu M (2010) Coal gasification for DRI production - and Indian solution. Steel Times Int 34(3):1–3Google Scholar
  11. Chen WH, Lin MR, Leu TS, Du SW (2011) An evaluation of hydrogen production from the perspective of using blast furnace gas and coke oven gas as feedstocks. Int J Hydrog Energy 36:11727–11737.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.06.049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen J, Chen W, Jiao Y, Wang X (2019) Gasification kinetics of bituminous coal char in the mixture of CO2, H2O, CO, and H2. Energies 12(3):496.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en12030496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chevrier V (2018) Midrex H2 TM: ultimate low-CO2 ironmaking and its place in the new hydrogen economy. In: AISTech - iron and steel technology conference proceedings, pp 725–729Google Scholar
  14. Deloitte (2013) Lower-cost natural gas and its impacts. Deloitte report June 2013Google Scholar
  15. Deloitte United States (2011) Deloitte Center for Energy Solutions and Deloitte Market Point LLC. Made in America: the economic impact of LNG exports from the United States. http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_US/Service/consulting/9f70dd1cc9324310VgnVCM1000001a56f00aRCRD.htm
  16. Duarte P (2018) High-carbon HBI and the analysis of formation of iron carbide and behavior in the energiron ZR process. In: AISTech - iron and steel technology conference proceedings, pp 633–647Google Scholar
  17. Duarte P, Becerra J (2016) Production of high-carbon directly reduced iron at Tenova HYL. Chernye Metally 6:24–30Google Scholar
  18. Duarte P, Martinez J (2017) Improving performances and decreasing CO2 emissions in blast furnaces installations with high-carbon DRI/HBI. In: AISTech - iron and steel technology conference proceedings, pp 815–824Google Scholar
  19. Duarte P, Scarnati T (2012) Advances in energy consumption and environmental improvements using high-carbon DRI in an EAF shop. In: International workshop, Associazione Italiana di Metallurgia, MilanGoogle Scholar
  20. Duarte PE, Becerra J, Lizcano C, Martinis A (2008) Energiron direct reduction technology-economical, flexible, environmentally friendly. Acero LatinoAmericano 6:52Google Scholar
  21. Duarte PE, Becerra J, Lizcano C, Martinis A (2010a) Energiron direct reduction ironmaking-economical, flexible, environmentally friendly. Steel Times Int 34(3):25–30Google Scholar
  22. Duarte P E, Tavano A, Zendejas E (2010b) Achieving carbon-free emissions via the Energiron DR process. In: AISTech 2010, proceedings of the iron and steel technology conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 3–6 May 2010, Warrendale, PA, USA, Association for Iron and Steel Technology (AIST), vol 1, pp 165–173Google Scholar
  23. Duarte P, Scarnati T, Martinis A (2013) Higher DRI quality and higher EAF yields by optimized DRI making. Metall Plant Technol Int 36(4):34–37Google Scholar
  24. Fischedick M, Marzinkowski J, Winzer P, Weigel M (2014) Techno-economic evaluation of innovative steel production technologies. J Clean Prod 84:563–580.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gaines HP, Ravenscroft CM (2014) A scenario for integrated sustainability: application of the TRS® for the integrated blast furnace steel industry. In: AISTech - iron and steel technology conference proceedings, pp 225–234Google Scholar
  26. Gautam V, Shifrin V (2018) Reduction in chemical energy costs for EAF steelmaking. In: AISTech - iron and steel technology conference proceedings, pp 883–892Google Scholar
  27. Griscom F N, Metius G E, Kopfle J T (2000) Ironmaking technology for the new millennium. Direct from Midrex, 2nd QuarterGoogle Scholar
  28. Guo D, Hu M, Pu C, Xiao B, Hu Z, Liu S, Wang X, Zhu X (2015) Kinetics and mechanisms of direct reduction of iron ore-biomass composite pellets with hydrogen gas. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:4733–4740.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.02.065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guo D, Zhu L, Guo S, Cui B, Luo S, Laghari M, Chen Z, Ma C, Zhou Y, Chen J, Xiao B, Hu M, Luo S (2016) Direct reduction of oxidized iron ore pellets using biomass syngas as the reducer. Fuel Proc Technol 148:276–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.03.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gupta RC (2015) Energy resources, its role and use in metallurgical industries. In: Treatise on process metallurgy. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1425–1458.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-096988-6.00034-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hasambeigi A, Arens M, Price L (2014) Alternative emerging ironmaking technologies for energy-efficiency and carbon dioxide emissions reduction: a technical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 33:645–658.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Helle M, Huitu K, Helle H, Kekkonen M, Saxén H (2012) Optimization of steelmaking using fastmet DRI in the blast furnace. In: 6th international congress on the science and technology of ironmaking 2012, ICSTI 2012 - including proceedings from the 42nd ironmaking and raw materials seminar, and the 13th Brazilian symposium on iron ore, vol 2, pp 1153–1165Google Scholar
  33. Hölling M, Braun U, Jüchter A, Prölß J (2011) Increase of energy efficiency at the ArcelorMittal Hamburg steel plant. Stahl Eisen 131(11):77–89Google Scholar
  34. Hölling M, Weng M, Geliert S (2017) Evaluation of hydrogen-based production of DRI. Stahl Eisen 137:47–54Google Scholar
  35. Hölling M, Weng M, Gellert S (2018) Analysis of sponge iron production with H2. Chernye Metally 3(1):6–11Google Scholar
  36. Hosseini SE, Wahid MA (2016) Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: promising green energy carrier for clean development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 57:850–866.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Huitu K, Helle H, Helle M, Kekkonen M, Saxén H (2013) Optimization of steelmaking using fastmet direct reduced iron in the blast furnace. ISIJ Int 53(12):2038–2046.  https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.53.2038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Huitu K, Helle M, Helle H, Kekkonen M, Saxén H (2015) Optimization of Midrex direct reduced iron use in ore-based steelmaking. Steel Res Int 86(5):456–465.  https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.201400091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hunter R, Ravenscroft C (2014) Is too much carbon a problem? Direct from Midrex, pp 4–8Google Scholar
  40. Hunter RL, Ravenscroft CM (2017) Voestalpine Texas-a new market for hot briquetted iron. Iron Steel Technol 14(3):38–43Google Scholar
  41. Jiang X, Wang L, Shen FM (2013) Shaft furnace direct reduction technology—Midrex and Energiron. Adv Mater Res 805-806:654–659.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.805-806.654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. K1-MET (2018) Energy in future steelmaking. In: European steel: the wind of change, Brussels, 31 January 2018Google Scholar
  43. Karakaya E, Nuur C, Assbring L (2018) Potential transitions in the iron and steel industry in Sweden: towards a hydrogen-based future? J Clean Prod 195:651–663.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kazemi M, Saffari Pour M, Sichen D (2017) Experimental and modeling study on reduction of hematite pellets by hydrogen gas. Metall Mater Trans B 48:1114–1122.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-016-0895-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kim WH, Lee S, Kim SM, Min DJ (2013) The retardation kinetics of magnetite reduction using H2 and H2-H2O mixtures. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:4194–4200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kolbeinsen L (2010) Modelling of DRI processes with two simultaneously active reducing gases. Steel Res Int 81(10):819–828.  https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.201000144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lei Q, Wang B, Wang P, Liu S (2019) Hydrogen generation with acid/alkaline amphoteric water electrolysis. J Energy Chem 38:162–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2018.12.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Li Q, Liu B, Feng M, Zou Z (2012) Numerical analysis on proportioning and maximum utilization of physical and chemical energies in Midrex shaft furnace. Huagong Xuebao/CIESC J 63(12):3906–3913.  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2012.12.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lisienko VG Ed. (2007) Solov’eva NV, Trofi mova OG, alternative metallurgy: the alloying problem and model estimates of efficiency, Teplotekhnik, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  50. Lisienko VG, Chesnokov YN, Lapteva AV (2015) Analysis of energy content and CO2 emissions in different combinations of coke-using and coke-less processes for steel production. Metallurgist 59(5–6):359–367.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11015-015-0110-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lisienko VG, Chesnokov YN, Lapteva AV, Noskov VY (2016) IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 150:012023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Liu BN, Li Q, Zou ZS, Yu AB (2014) Discussion on chemical energy utilisation of reducing gas in reduction shaft furnace. Ironmak Steelmak 41(8):568–574.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1743281213Y.0000000168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Liu D, Wang X, Zhang J, Liu Z, Jiao K, Liu X, Wang R (2017) Study on the controlling steps and reduction kinetics of iron oxide briquettes with CO-H2 mixtures. Metall Res Technol 114:611.  https://doi.org/10.1051/metal/2017072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lu F, Wen L, Zhao Y, Zhong H, Xu J, Zhang S, Yang Z (2019) The competitive adsorption behavior of CO and H2 molecules on FeO surface in the reduction process. Int J Hydr Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Manenti AA (2015) Economics and value-in-use of DRI in the USA. In: AISTech - iron and steel technology conference proceedings, pp 333–344Google Scholar
  56. Manenti AA, Duarte P, Morales J (2017) High-carbon DRI and its use and advantages in EAF operations. Iron Steel Technol 14(3):64–70Google Scholar
  57. Metius G, Arandas MD, Chevrier VF, Ravenscroft CM (2017) Advancing DRI product flexibility: new technologies and applications for steelmakers by maximizing operational flexibility of MIDREX® DRI plants. SEAISI Q 46(3):41–44Google Scholar
  58. Midrex (2017) Direct from Midrex 3rd quarter 2017Google Scholar
  59. Mizutani N, Kishimoto T, Maeda N (2014) Application of coke oven gas to MIDREX process. R and D: Res Develop Kobe Steel Eng Rep 64(1):14–17Google Scholar
  60. Mohsenzadeh FM, Payab H, Abdoli MA, Abedi Z (2018) An environmental study on persian direct reduction (PERED®) technology: comparing capital cost and energy saving with MIDREX® technology. Ekoloji 27:959–967Google Scholar
  61. Mohsenzadeh FM, Payab H, Abedi Z, Abdoli MA (2019) Reduction of CO2 emissions and energy consumption by improving equipment in direct reduction ironmaking plant. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21:847.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01672-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Muscolino F, Martinis A, Ghiglione M, Duarte P (2016) Introduction to direct reduction technology and outlook for its use. Metallurgia Ital 108(4):25–31Google Scholar
  63. Nucor Corporation (2012) Nucor announces long-term natural gas agreement press release. http://www.nucor.com/investor/news/releases/?rid=1754835
  64. Otto A, Robinius M, Grube T, Shieban S, Praktiknjo A, Stolten D (2017) Power-to-steel: reducing CO2 through the integration of renewable energy and hydrogen into the German steel industry. Energies 10(4):451–572.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en10040451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Park H, Sohn I, Freislich M, Sahajwalla V (2017) Investigation on the reduction behavior of coal composite pellet at temperatures between 1373 and 1573 K. Steel Res Int 88(3):1600169.  https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.201600169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Parvizi B, Khanlarkhani A, Palizdar Y (2018) Nonlinear predictive control based on artificial neural network model for pilot reformer plant: approach for ratio control. Bulg Chem Commun 50(2):286–293Google Scholar
  67. Plaul FJ, Böhm C, Schenk JL (2009) Fluidized-bed technology for the production of iron products for steelmaking. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 108(2):121–128Google Scholar
  68. Poveromo JJ (2018) Iron ore for alternate iron processes. In: Vision, innovation and identity: step change for a sustainable future - 2018 SME annual conference and expo and 91st annual meeting of the SME-MN sectionGoogle Scholar
  69. Poveromo JJ, Rorick FC (2012) Developments in north American iron ore & ironmaking. In: 6th international congress on the science and technology of ironmaking 2012, ICSTI 2012 - including proceedings from the 42nd ironmaking and raw materials seminar, and the 13th Brazilian symposium on iron ore, vol 1, pp 597–608Google Scholar
  70. Prammer J (2019) The actual problems of current decarbonization. Chernye Metally 1:55–59Google Scholar
  71. Raggio C (2012) Recent developments of energy saving and environmental protection in the steel industry. Metallurgia Ital 104(10):51–58Google Scholar
  72. Rajput P, Sabat KC, Paramguru RK, Bhoi B, Mishra BK (2014) Direct reduction of iron in low temperature hydrogen plasma. Ironmak Steelmak 41(10):721–731.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1743281214Y.0000000186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ranzani da Costa A, Wagner D, Patisson F (2013) Modelling a new, low CO2 emissions, hydrogen steelmaking process. J Clean Prod 46:26–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ravenscroft CM, Howell RW, Bonelli G (2018) Building a bigger DRI plant: expanding operational flexibility with responsible and reliable scale-up of new 2.5 MTPy Midrex® CDRI/HDRI plants in Algeria. In: AISTech - iron and steel technology conference proceedings, pp 715–723Google Scholar
  75. Raymond L, Leiv K (2008) Iron ore reduction with CO and H2 gas mixtures – thermodynamic and kinetic modelling. In: Proceedings of the 4th Ulcos seminar 1st & 2nd OctoberGoogle Scholar
  76. Rojas-Cardenas JC, Hasanbeigi A, Sheinbaum-Pardo C, Price L (2017) Energy efficiency in the Mexican iron and steel industry from an international perspective. J Clean Prod 158:335–348.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ruthenbeck A, Lamb M, Chevrier V (2018) Hot briquetting trials with variable-carbon DRI. In: AISTech - iron and steel technology conference proceedings, pp 649–658Google Scholar
  78. Sarkar S, Bhattacharya R, Roy GG, Sen PK (2018) Modeling MIDREX based process configurations for energy and emission analysis. Steel Res Int 89:1700248.  https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.201700248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schenck J, Lüngen HB (2017) Review of application of DRI processes in EC countries. Chernye Metally 2:25–31Google Scholar
  80. Sgobbi A, Nijs W, De Miglio R, Chiodi A, Gargiulo M, Thiel C (2016) How far away is hydrogen? Its role in the medium and long-term decarbonisation of the European energy system. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:19–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sharma MK, Solanki V, Roy GG, Sen PK (2013) Study of reduction behaviour of prefabricated iron ore-graphite/coal composite pellets in rotary hearth furnace. Ironmak Steelmak 40(8):590–597.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1743281212Y.0000000086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sohn HY, Mohassab Y (2016) Greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption of ironmaking processes. In: Cavaliere P (ed) Ironmaking and steelmaking processes: greenhouse emissions, control, and reduction. Springer, Cham, pp 427–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Srishilan C, Shukla AK (2019) Thermodynamic model of COREX melter gasifier using FactSage™ and macro facility. Metall Mater Trans B 50(1):312–323.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-018-1476-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tanaka H (2013) Potential for CO2 emissions reduction in Midrex direct reduction process. Kobelco 6 November 2013. www.thyssenkrupp-industrial-solutions.com
  85. Vogl V, Åhman M, Nilsson LJ (2018) Assessment of hydrogen direct reduction for fossil-free steelmaking. J Clean Prod 203:736–745.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wieslaw T, Hughes G (2015) Coal gasification-based DRI production: start-up and operation of JSPL’s Angul I MXCOL® DRI Plant. SEAISI Q 44(3):38–42Google Scholar
  87. Yang Z, Hu J, Li Y, Chen Y, Qian K, Yang H, Chen H (2019) Catalytic steam gasification of Mengdong coal in the presence of iron ore for hydrogen-rich gas production. J Energy Inst 92(2):391–402.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2017.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Yilmaz C, Wendelstorf J, Turek T (2017) Modeling and simulation of hydrogen injection into a blast furnace to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. J Clean Prod 154:488–501.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Yuan P, Shen B, Duan D, Adwek G, Mei X, Lu F (2017) Study on the formation of direct reduced iron by using biomass as reductants of carbon containing pellets in RHF process. Energy 141:472–482.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zare Ghadi A, Valipour MS, Biglari M (2017) CFD simulation of two-phase gas-particle flow in the Midrex shaft furnace: the effect of twin gas injection system on the performance of the reactor. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(1):103–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.11.053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zhang YY, Qi YH, Zou ZS, Li YG (2013) Development prospect of rotary hearth furnace process in China. Adv Mater Res 746:533–538.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.746.533CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pasquale Cavaliere
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Innovation EngineeringUniversity of SalentoLecceItaly

Personalised recommendations