Skip to main content

‘Getting it Right First Time’: The Effects of Anxiety and Fear on a Birthing Woman

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Anxiety, Worry and Fear in Childbearing
  • 565 Accesses

Abstract

Throughout pregnancy, women in the UK are assured of support and care in labour. Women are however advised to stay at home for as long as possible, but to contact maternity services when they need advice or help. The reality for some women is that they are turned away from maternity services, told that they are not yet in labour, or not advanced enought in labour to warrent admission to their chosen place for birth. This has devastating consequences for some women. As Freya's birth stories unfold, the long lasting impact of a poor first birth experience for women, shows how not getting it right first time influences their decisions for future births.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 17 April 2020

    This chapter was inadvertently published with incorrect affiliation for this chapter author. It has been corrected in this updated version.

References

  • Anderson T (2010) Feeling safe enough to let go: the relationship between a woman and her midwife during the second stage of labour. In: Kirkham M (ed) The midwife-mother relationship. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonar S (2015) State of maternity services 2015. RCM Midwives 18(Winter):15

    Google Scholar 

  • Brydon-Miller M, Kral M, Maguire P, Noffke S, Sabhlok A (eds) (2011) Jazz and the Banyan tree: roots and riffs on participatory action research, 4th edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumberlege J (2016) The national maternity review. NHS England, London http://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/futurenhs/mat-review

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis P, Ball L, Kirkham M (2006a) Bullying and horizontal violence: cultural or individual phenomena. Br J Midwifery 14(4):218–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis P, Ball L, Kirkham M (2006b) Why do midwives leave? (not) being the kind of midwife you wanted to be. Br J Midwifery 14(1):27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlen H, Downe S, Duff M, Gyte G (2013) Vaginal examinations during normal labour: routine examination or routine intervention. Int J Nurs Stud 3(3):142–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Deery R (2003) Engaging with clinical supervision in a community midwifery setting: an action research study. University of Sheffield, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards N, Mander R, Murphy-Lawless J (2018) Untangling the maternity crisis, 1st edn. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gatenby B, Humphries M (2000) Feminist participatory action research: methodological and ethical issues. Women's Stud Int Forum 23(1):89–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan C (2015) The listening guide method of psychological enquiry. Qual Inq 2(1):69–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassman M, Erdem G (2014) Participatory action research and its meanings: vivencia, praxis, conscientization. Adult Educ Q 64(3):206–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield M (2016) What is traumatic birth? A concept analysis and literature review. Br J Midwifery 24(4):254–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross MM, Haunschild T, Stoexen T, Methner V, Guenter HH (2003) Women’s recognition of the spontaneous onset of labor. Birth 30(4):267–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross MM, Fromke C, Schippert C, Burian RA, Hecker H, Hillemanns P (2009) Onset of labour: women’s experiences and midwives’ assessments in relation to first stage duration. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280:899–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodnett E, Downe S, Walsh D (2012) Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hooks B (2000) Feminism is for everybody. Pluto Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham M (2003) Birth centres: a social model of care. Books for Midwives Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauthner N, Doucet A (1998) Reflections on a voice-centred relational method: analysing maternal and domestic violence. In: Ribbens J, Edwards R (eds) Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan E, Woodley E (2010) Confessions confounding narrative and ethics. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle

    Google Scholar 

  • NCT (2010) Home birth information sheet. https://www.nct.org.uk/

  • RCM (2009) Standards for birth centres in England

    Google Scholar 

  • RCM (2011) The Royal College of Midwives survey of midwives’ current thinking about home birth. Royal College of Midwives Trust (RCM), London

    Google Scholar 

  • RCM (2015) Review of midwifery regulation by the nursing and midwifery council. A briefing paper. Royal College of Midwives, London https://info@rcm.org.uk

    Google Scholar 

  • RCM (2016) Opinion thoughts, views and your feedback. RCM Midwives 19(Spring):21–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew M, McFadden A, Bastos MH, Campbell J, Channon AA, Cheung NF, Audebert Delage Silva DR, Downe S, Powell Kennedy H, Malata A, McCormick F, Wick L, Declercq E (2014) Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet 384:1129–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandall J (2015) The contribution of continuity of midwifery care to high quality maternity care. Royal College of Midwives, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Devane D (2013) Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. London. http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/

  • Scot.Gov (2017) The best start: a five year forward plan for maternity and neonatal care in Scotland: executive summary

    Google Scholar 

  • Shallow HED (2018) When midwives become other. In: Edwards N, Mander R, Murphy-Lawless J (eds) Untangling the maternity crisis, 1st edn. Routledge, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shallow HED, Deery R, Kirkham M (2018) Exploring midwives’ interactions with women when labour begins: a study using participatory action research. Midwifery 58:64–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiby H, Green J, Renfrew M, Crawshaw S, Stewart P, Lishman J, Brocklehurst P, Quigley M, Sculpher M, Weatherly H (2008) Improving care at the primary/secondary interface: a trial of community-based support in early labour. The ELSA trial. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AD, Golonka S (2013) Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Front Psychol 4:58

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shallow, H. (2020). ‘Getting it Right First Time’: The Effects of Anxiety and Fear on a Birthing Woman. In: Gutteridge, K. (eds) Understanding Anxiety, Worry and Fear in Childbearing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21063-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21063-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21062-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21063-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics