Skip to main content

Overview: Formal Management Systems, Intrinsic CSR, and the Role of Culture in Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In the light of numerous well-publicised problems and scandals involving large corporations whose highly formalised CSR systems failed to prevent anti-social and illegal behaviour, there is growing interest in informal processes and relationships that foster organisational cultures that embed and exemplify Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). CSR frameworks worldwide have been dominated by the concerns and distinctive needs of large companies and by efforts to manage CSR through a management system. However, there is a new story of business that is emerging post global financial crisis. There is a renewed interest in revisioning business to make it more compatible with human aims. It is proposed that detailed section of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) with informal and non-systematic approaches to CSR can shed light on these issues of cultural embedding of CSR values. Accordingly, this section focuses on the one hand on Germany and the principles of Honourable Merchants, a thousand-year tradition, that have been reinforced and revitalised after economic crises in the private and public sector. Further, case studies of Swiss SMEs investigate the processes, values, and relationships that make up informal CSR oriented organisational cultures. Thus, it aims at identifying key drivers and dynamics of different management systems as well as business models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arend, R. J. (2013). Ethics-focused dynamic capabilities: A small business perspective. Small Business Economics,41, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann-Pauly, D., Wickert, C., Spence, L. J., & Scherer, A. G. (2013). Organising corporate social responsibility in small and large firms: Size matters. Journal of Business Ethics,115(4), 693–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., Millington, A. I., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organisational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management,18(10), 1701–1719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., Hoejmose, S., & Marchant, K. (2012). Environmental management in SMEs in the UK: Practices, pressure and perceived benefits. Business Strategy and the Environment,21, 423–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C.-J. (2014). Hotels’ environmental policies and employee personal environmental beliefs: Interactions and outcomes. Tourism Management,40, 436–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,15, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Baldo, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: The experience of some “spirited businesses”. Journal of Management Governance. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10997-009-9127-4. Accessed 4 September 2014.

  • European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for corporate social responsibility.http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0681:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 17 August 2018.

  • Fassin, Y. (2008). SMEs and the fallacy of formalising CSR. Business Ethics: A European Review,17(4), 364–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filbeck, G., & Gorman, R. F. (2004). The relationship between environmental and financial performance of public utilities. Environmental & Resource Economics,29, 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, G. C., & Lorenz, C. (2012). Schweizer Unternehmen als gute Bürger - Eine Tradition im Wandel der Zeit. In T. Wehner & G. C. Gentile (Eds.), Corporate volunteering. uniscope: Publikationen der SGO Stiftung (pp. 79–89). Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag Springer Fachmedien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J. J., & Mazereeuw-Van der Duijn Schouten, C. (2012). Motives for corporate social responsibility. De Economist, 160, 377–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J. J., & van de Ven, B. (2006, Summer). Strategic and moral motivation for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 22, 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansla, A., Gamble, A., Juliusson, A., & Gärling, T. (2008). The relationship between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientation. Journal of Environmental Psychology,28(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics,50(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics,67(3), 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsoulakos, P., & Katsoulakos, Y. (2007). Integrating corporate responsibility principles and stakeholder approaches into mainstream strategy: A stakeholder-oriented and integrative strategic management framework. Corporate Governance,7(4), 355–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, W., & Pickett, G. (2008). How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concerns, and environmentally responsible behaviour. Journal of Business Research,61, 885–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looser, S., & Wehrmeyer W. (2014). CSR mapping: Swiss stakeholder salience, concerns, and ethics. Social Science Research Network. http://papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, S. P., & Fontrodona, J. (2013). Strategic CSR for SMEs: Paradox or possibility? Universia Business Review. Secundo Trimestre 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). ‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for understanding CSR in Europe (ICCSR Research Paper Series No. 29), pp. 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midttun, A., Gautesen, K., & Gjølberg, M. (2006). The political economy of CSR in Western Europe. Corporate Governance,4, 369–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1983). The case for social responsibility. Journal of Business Strategy,4(2), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nkiko, C. M. (2013). SME owner-manager as key drivers of corporate social responsibility in Uganda. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics,8(4), 376–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osuji, O. (2011). Fluidity of regulation-CSR nexus: The multinational corporate corruption example. Journal of Business Ethics,103, 31–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quazi, A. M. (2003). Identifying the determinants of corporate manager’s perceived social obligations. Management Decision,41(9), 822–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skapinker, M. (2008, April 28). Virtue’s reward? Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L.-J. (2007). CSR and small business in a European policy context: The five “C”s of CSR and small business research agenda 2007. Business and Society Review,112(4), 533–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steurer, R. (2010). The role of governments on corporate social responsibility: Characterising public policies on CSR in Europe. Policy Science,43, 49–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steurer, R., Martinuzzi, A., & Margula, S. (2012). Public policies on CSR in Europe: Themes, instruments, and regional differences. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,19, 206–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telle, K. (2006). “It pays to be green”—A premature conclusion? Environmental & Resource Economics, 35, 195–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidaver-Cohen, D., & Simcic Broon, D. (2013). Reputation, responsibility, and stakeholder support in Scandinavian firms: A comparative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M., Schaltegger, S., & Wehrmeyer, W. (2001). The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms—What does theory propose and what does empirical evidence tell us? Greener Management International, 34, 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G., & Brewster, C. (2005). Trust, intrafirm and supplier relations. Business and Society Review,110(4), 459–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stéphanie Looser .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Looser, S. (2020). Overview: Formal Management Systems, Intrinsic CSR, and the Role of Culture in Management. In: Wehrmeyer, W., Looser, S., Del Baldo, M. (eds) Intrinsic CSR and Competition. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21037-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics