Abstract
Nowadays, the web is becoming highly used technology, in our community. This technology allows us to work in collaboration and to share knowledge. The pragmatic web represents the most recent extension of the web (semantic web); which facilitates the exploitation and the interpretation of the data by the machine. This web is based on three important components, the context, the community, and the meaning negotiation. The Meaning negotiation is the most important component of the pragmatic web on which we will fix our attention. It plays an important role in the exchanges and resolves conflicts in people cooperation activities. The knowledge (context) of each part in the community of users is heterogeneous; this will make the meaning negotiation complicated. This paper realizes a meaning negotiation scenario based on the ontologies merging into the geopolitical domain. This will reduce and simplifies the process, and improves the semantics of data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
De Moor, A.: Patterns for the pragmatic web. In: International Conference on Conceptual Structures, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Keskes, N., Rahmoun, A.: Meaning negotiation based on merged individual context ontology and part of semantic web ontology. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. 11(3), 352–368 (2017)
Paschke, A.: Pragmatic web 4.0. Towards an active and interactive semantic media web. W3C Aspect of Semantic Technologies (2013)
Singh, M.P.: The pragmatic web: Preliminary thoughts. In: Proceedings of the NSF-Onto Web-Workshop on Database and Information Systems Research for Semantic Web and Enterprises, pp. 82–90 (2002)
Dimaio, P.: The missing pragmatic link in the semantic web. Bus. Intell. Advisory Serv. 8(7) (2008)
Mustapha, S.S.: CoP sensing framework on web-based environment. In: Web-Based Support Systems, pp. 333–357. Springer, London (2010)
Warglien, M., Gärdenfors, P.: Meaning negotiation. In: Applications of Conceptual Spaces, pp. 79–94. Springer, Cham (2015)
Jmii, H., Meddeb, A., Chebbi, S.: An approach for improving voltage stability by combination of SVC and TCSC. In: 2016 7th International Conference on Sciences of Electronics, Technologies of Information and Telecommunications (SETIT), pp. 134–141. IEEE (2016)
Chaari, T., Laforest, F., Flory, A.: Adaptation des applications au contexte en utilisant les services web. In: Proceedings of the 2nd French-Speaking Conference on Mobility and Ubiquity Computing, pp. 111–118. ACM (2005)
Abioui, H., Idarrou, A., Bouzit, A., et al.: Multi-ontology based semantic annotation review. In: 2016 7th International Conference on Sciences of Electronics, Technologies of Information and Telecommunications (SETIT), pp. 189–193. IEEE (2016)
Arrar, A.: The role of contextual ontologies in enterprise modeling, world academy of science, engineering and technology. Int. J. Comput. Electric. Autom. Control Inf. Eng. 4(9) (2010)
Magnini, B., Serafini, L., Speranza, M.: Using NLP techniques for meaning negotiation. In: Proceedings of VIII Convegno AI* IA, Siena, Italy, pp. 11–13 (2002)
De Moor, A.: Ontology-guided meaning negotiation in communities of practice. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on the Design for Large-Scale Digital Communities at the 2nd International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T 2005), Milano, Italy (2005)
Van Diggelen, J., Beun, J., Dignum, F., Van Eijk, R.M., Meyer, J.J.: Ontology negotiation goals, requirements, and implementation. Int. J. Agent-Oriented Softw. Eng. 1(1), 63–90 (2007)
Ermolayev, V., Keberle, N., Matzke, W.E., Vladimirov, V.: A strategy for automated meaning negotiation in distributed information retrieval. LNCS, vol. 3729, p. 201 (2005)
Souza, M., Moreira, A., Vieira, R., et al.: Integrating ontology negotiation and agent communication. In: International Experiences and Directions Workshop on OWL, pp. 56–68. Springer (2015)
Farrugia, J.: Logical systems: Towards protocols for web-based meaning negotiation. In: Meaning Negotiation, Papers from the AAAI Workshop, pp. 56–59 (2002)
Burato, E., Cristani Matteo, M., Viganò, L.: Meaning negotiation as inference. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1101.4356 (2011)
Kutucu, H., Hakan, H., Almryad, A.: An application of artificial neural networks to assessment of the wind energy potential in Libya. In: 2016 7th International Conference on Sciences of Electronics, Technologies of Information and Telecommunications (SETIT), pp. 405–409. IEEE (2016)
Lindh-Knuutila, T., Honkela, T., Lagus, K.: Simulating meaning negotiation using observational language games. In: Symbol Grounding and Beyond, pp. 168–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Benkerrou, H., Heddad, S., Omar, M.: Credit and honesty-based trust assessment for hierarchical collaborative IoT systems. In: 2016 7th International Conference on Sciences of Electronics, Technologies of Information and Telecommunications (SETIT), pp. 295–299. IEEE (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Graba, D.D., Keskes, N., Amar Bensaber, D. (2020). Meaning Negotiation. In: Bouhlel, M., Rovetta, S. (eds) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Sciences of Electronics, Technologies of Information and Telecommunications (SETIT’18), Vol.1. SETIT 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 146. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21005-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21005-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21004-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21005-2
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)