Abstract
This volume of eight chapters, including the present overview, describes several variables affecting the relationship between visuospatial processing and education in health and natural sciences. The scope of the volume is on adult university students executing the small-scale visuospatial processing abilities investigated by the research traditions of spatial ability and working memory. This overview chapter aims to summarize the other seven chapters of the book and to show their general structure. As such, the present chapter briefly describes: (a) the different small-scale abilities that are controlled by the visuospatial processor of working memory (Chap. 2); (b) the reciprocal relationship between visuospatial processing and science education (Chap. 3); (c) the influence of sex (women versus men) on visuospatial processing (Chap. 4); (d) how science instructional visualizations can be optimized following cognitive load theory, and how this optimization is influenced by visuospatial processing (Chap. 5); (e) the relationship between interactive science multimedia (simulations and videogames) and visuospatial processing (Chap. 6); (f) the influence of embodied cognition (mainly object manipulation and gesturing) on science education and visuospatial processing (Chap. 7); and (g) VAR, a battery of instruments that can measure different visuospatial processing abilities in the computer and mobile devices (Chap. 8).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atit, K., Shipley, T. F., & Tikoff, B. (2013). Twisting space: Are rigid and non-rigid mental transformations separate spatial skills? Cognitive Processing, 14(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0550-8.
Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2007). Can the cognitive load approach make instructional animations more effective? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 811–820. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1351.
Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2014). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 206–226). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.011.
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559.
Barrett, T. J., & Hegarty, M. (2016). Effects of interface and spatial ability on manipulation of virtual models in a STEM domain. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.026.
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.
Berney, S., Bétrancourt, M., Molinari, G., & Hoyek, N. (2015). How spatial abilities and dynamic visualizations interplay when learning functional anatomy with 3D anatomical models. Anatomical Sciences Education, 8(5), 452–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1524.
Blackburn, R. A. R., Villa-Marcos, B., & Williams, D. P. (2019). Preparing students for practical sessions using laboratory simulation software. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(1), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00549.
Blacker, K. J., Curby, K. M., Klobusicky, E., & Chein, J. M. (2014). Effects of action video game training on visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 40(5), 1992–2004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037556.
Bruyer, R., & Scailquin, J.-C. (1998). The visuospatial sketchpad for mental images: Testing the multicomponent model of working memory. Acta Psychologica, 98(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00053-X.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., & Atit, K. (this volume). Different abilities controlled by visuospatial processing. In J. C. Castro-Alonso (Ed.), Visuospatial processing for education in health and natural sciences (pp. 23–51). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_2.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., & Fiorella, L. (this volume). Interactive science multimedia and visuospatial processing. In J. C. Castro-Alonso (Ed.), Visuospatial processing for education in health and natural sciences (pp. 145–173). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_6.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., & Jansen, P. (this volume). Sex differences in visuospatial processing. In J. C. Castro-Alonso (Ed.), Visuospatial processing for education in health and natural sciences (pp. 81–110). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_4.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., & Uttal, D. H. (2019). Spatial ability for university biology education. In S. Nazir, A.-M. Teperi, & A. Polak-Sopińska (Eds.), Advances in human factors in training, education, and learning sciences: Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences (pp. 283–291). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93882-0_28.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., & Uttal, D. H. (this volume). Science education and visuospatial processing. In J. C. Castro-Alonso (Ed.), Visuospatial processing for education in health and natural sciences (pp. 53–79). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_3.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2014). Learning from observing hands in static and animated versions of non-manipulative tasks. Learning and Instruction, 34, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.07.005.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2015). The potential of embodied cognition to improve STEAM instructional dynamic visualizations. In X. Ge, D. Ifenthaler, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Emerging technologies for STEAM education: Full STEAM ahead (pp. 113–136). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02573-5_7.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2018a). Computerized and adaptable tests to measure visuospatial abilities in STEM students. In T. Andre (Ed.), Advances in human factors in training, education, and learning sciences: Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences (pp. 337–349). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60018-5_33.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., Wong, M., & Paas, F. (2018b). Learning symbols from permanent and transient visual presentations: Don’t overplay the hand. Computers & Education, 116, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.011.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (this volume-a). VAR: A battery of computer-based instruments to measure visuospatial processing. In J. C. Castro-Alonso (Ed.), Visuospatial processing for education in health and natural sciences (pp. 207–229). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_8.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (this volume-b). Instructional visualizations, cognitive load theory, and visuospatial processing. In J. C. Castro-Alonso (Ed.), Visuospatial processing for education in health and natural sciences (pp. 111–143). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_5.
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Paas, F., & Ginns, P. (this volume-c). Embodied cognition, science education, and visuospatial processing. In J. C. Castro-Alonso (Ed.), Visuospatial processing for education in health and natural sciences (pp. 175–205). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_7.
Cheng, M.-T., Su, T., Huang, W.-Y., & Chen, J.-H. (2014). An educational game for learning human immunology: What do students learn and how do they perceive? British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(5), 820–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12098.
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823.
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7.
Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. S. (2016). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582065.
Courvoisier, D. S., Renaud, O., Geiser, C., Paschke, K., Gaudy, K., & Jordan, K. (2013). Sex hormones and mental rotation: An intensive longitudinal investigation. Hormones and Behavior, 63(2), 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.12.007.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6.
Della Sala, S., Gray, C., Baddeley, A., Allamano, N., & Wilson, L. (1999). Pattern span: A tool for unwelding visuo–spatial memory. Neuropsychologia, 37(10), 1189–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00159-6.
Domagk, S., Schwartz, R. N., & Plass, J. L. (2010). Interactivity in multimedia learning: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1024–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.003.
Donovan, L. M., Argenbright, C. A., Mullen, L. K., & Humbert, J. L. (2018). Computer-based simulation: Effective tool or hindrance for undergraduate nursing students? Nurse Education Today, 69, 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.07.007.
Eals, M., & Silverman, I. (1994). The Hunter-Gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: Proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)90020-5.
Eitel, A., Bender, L., & Renkl, A. (2019). Are seductive details seductive only when you think they are relevant? An experimental test of the moderating role of perceived relevance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3479.
Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
Erhel, S., & Jamet, E. (2006). Using pop-up windows to improve multimedia learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00165.x.
Fenesi, B., Kramer, E., & Kim, J. A. (2016). Split-attention and coherence principles in multimedia instruction can rescue performance for learners with lower working memory capacity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(5), 691–699. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3244.
Fenesi, B., Lucibello, K., Kim, J. A., & Heisz, J. J. (2018). Sweat so you don’t forget: Exercise breaks during a university lecture increase on-task attention and learning. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(2), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.01.012.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). Paper-based aids for learning with a computer-based game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1074–1082. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028088.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016a). Effects of observing the instructor draw diagrams on learning from multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(4), 528–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000065.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016b). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 717–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2017). Spontaneous spatial strategy use in learning from scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.002.
Fiorella, L., Vogel-Walcutt, J. J., & Schatz, S. (2012). Applying the modality principle to real-time feedback and the acquisition of higher-order cognitive skills. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9218-1.
Foster, J. L., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Draheim, C., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2017). Do the effects of working memory training depend on baseline ability level? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(11), 1677–1689. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000426.
Ginns, P., & Kydd, A. (2019). Learning human physiology by pointing and tracing: A cognitive load approach. In S. Tindall-Ford, S. Agostinho, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Advances in cognitive load theory: Rethinking teaching (pp. 119–129). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429283895-10.
Göksun, T., Goldin-Meadow, S., Newcombe, N., & Shipley, T. (2013). Individual differences in mental rotation: What does gesture tell us? Cognitive Processing, 14(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0549-1.
Gold, A. U., Pendergast, P. M., Ormand, C. J., Budd, D. A., & Mueller, K. J. (2018). Improving spatial thinking skills among undergraduate geology students through short online training exercises. International Journal of Science Education, 40(18), 2205–2225. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1525621.
Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2007). Action-video-game experience alters the spatial resolution of vision. Psychological Science, 18(1), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01853.x.
Guimarães, B., Firmino-Machado, J., Tsisar, S., Viana, B., Pinto-Sousa, M., Vieira-Marques, P., et al. (2019). The role of anatomy computer-assisted learning on spatial abilities of medical students. Anatomical Sciences Education, 12(2), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1795.
Gutierrez, J. C., Chigerwe, M., Ilkiw, J. E., Youngblood, P., Holladay, S. D., & Srivastava, S. (2017). Spatial and visual reasoning: Do these abilities improve in first-year veterinary medical students exposed to an integrated curriculum? Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 44(4), 669–675. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0915-158R3.
Hale, S., Myerson, J., Rhee, S. H., Weiss, C. S., & Abrams, R. A. (1996). Selective interference with the maintenance of location information in working memory. Neuropsychology, 10(2), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.10.2.228.
Hammond, A. G., Murphy, E. M., Silverman, B. M., Bernas, R. S., & Nardi, D. (2019). No environmental context-dependent effect, but interference, of physical activity on object location memory. Cognitive Processing, 20(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-018-0875-4.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
Hausmann, M., Schoofs, D., Rosenthal, H. E. S., & Jordan, K. (2009). Interactive effects of sex hormones and gender stereotypes on cognitive sex differences—A psychobiosocial approach. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.09.019.
Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence, 32(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2003.12.001.
Heil, M., Kavšek, M., Rolke, B., Beste, C., & Jansen, P. (2011). Mental rotation in female fraternal twins: Evidence for intra-uterine hormone transfer? Biological Psychology, 86(1), 90–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.11.002.
Höffler, T. N., & Schwartz, R. N. (2011). Effects of pacing and cognitive style across dynamic and non-dynamic representations. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1716–1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.012.
Huk, T. (2006). Who benefits from learning with 3D models? The case of spatial ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(6), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00180.x.
Jang, S., Vitale, J. M., Jyung, R. W., & Black, J. B. (2017). Direct manipulation is better than passive viewing for learning anatomy in a three-dimensional virtual reality environment. Computers & Education, 106, 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.009.
Jirout, J. J., & Newcombe, N. S. (2015). Building blocks for developing spatial skills: Evidence from a large, representative U.S. sample. Psychological Science, 26(3), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614563338.
Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2014). The redundancy principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 247–262). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.013.
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189.
Kirchner, W. K. (1958). Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043688.
Kontra, C., Lyons, D. J., Fischer, S. M., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Physical experience enhances science learning. Psychological Science, 26(6), 737–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615569355.
Korbach, A., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2016). Learner characteristics and information processing in multimedia learning: A moderated mediation of the seductive details effect. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.030.
Kostusiak, M., Hart, M., Barone, D. G., Hofmann, R., Kirollos, R., Santarius, T., et al. (2017). Methodological shortcomings in the literature evaluating the role and applications of 3D training for surgical trainees. Medical Teacher, 39(11), 1168–1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1362102.
Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M. (2001). A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Memory & Cognition, 29(5), 745–756. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03200477.
Langlois, J., Bellemare, C., Toulouse, J., & Wells, G. A. (2019). Spatial abilities training in anatomy education: A systematic review. Anatomical Sciences Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1873.
Lawrence, B. M., Myerson, J., Oonk, H. M., & Abrams, R. A. (2001). The effects of eye and limb movements on working memory. Memory, 9(4–6), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210143000047.
Lejbak, L., Crossley, M., & Vrbancic, M. (2011). A male advantage for spatial and object but not verbal working memory using the n-back task. Brain and Cognition, 76(1), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.12.002.
Levinson, A. J., Weaver, B., Garside, S., McGinn, H., & Norman, G. R. (2007). Virtual reality and brain anatomy: A randomised trial of e-learning instructional designs. Medical Education, 41(5), 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02694.x.
Li, W., Wang, F., Mayer, R. E., & Liu, H. (2019). Getting the point: Which kinds of gestures by pedagogical agents improve multimedia learning? Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000352.
Lin, L., & Li, M. (2018). Optimizing learning from animation: Examining the impact of biofeedback. Learning and Instruction, 55, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.02.005.
Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–1498. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130467.
Loftus, J. J., Jacobsen, M., & Wilson, T. D. (2017). Learning and assessment with images: A view of cognitive load through the lens of cerebral blood flow. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 1030–1046. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12474.
Low, R., & Sweller, J. (2014). The modality principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 227–246). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.012.
Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390(6657), 279–281. https://doi.org/10.1038/36846.
Lufler, R. S., Zumwalt, A. C., Romney, C. A., & Hoagland, T. M. (2012). Effect of visual–spatial ability on medical students’ performance in a gross anatomy course. Anatomical Sciences Education, 5(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.264.
Macken, L., & Ginns, P. (2014). Pointing and tracing gestures may enhance anatomy and physiology learning. Medical Teacher, 36(7), 596–601. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.899684.
Mathewson, J. H. (2005). The visual core of science: Definition and applications to education. International Journal of Science Education, 27(5), 529–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500060417.
Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2019). Computer games in education. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102744.
Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2014). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 279–315). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.015.
McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004.
Michael, W. B., Guilford, J. P., Fruchter, B., & Zimmerman, W. S. (1957). The description of spatial-visualization abilities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 17(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316445701700202.
Milner, B. (1971). Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. British Medical Bulletin, 27(3), 272–277.
Minear, M., Brasher, F., Guerrero, C. B., Brasher, M., Moore, A., & Sukeena, J. (2016). A simultaneous examination of two forms of working memory training: Evidence for near transfer only. Memory & Cognition, 44(7), 1014–1037. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0616-9.
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.130.4.621.
Nairne, J. S., VanArsdall, J. E., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Blunt, J. R. (2012). Adaptive memory: Enhanced location memory after survival processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(2), 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025728.
Ness, D., Farenga, S. J., & Garofalo, S. G. (2017). Spatial intelligence: Why it matters from birth through the lifespan. New York: Routledge.
Newcombe, N. S. (2016). Thinking spatially in the science classroom. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.04.010.
Oliver-Hoyo, M., & Babilonia-Rosa, M. A. (2017). Promotion of spatial skills in chemistry and biochemistry education at the college level. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(8), 996–1006. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00094.
Oppezzo, M., & Schwartz, D. L. (2014). Give your ideas some legs: The positive effect of walking on creative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(4), 1142–1152. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036577.
Örün, Ö., & Akbulut, Y. (2019). Effect of multitasking, physical environment and electroencephalography use on cognitive load and retention. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 216–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.027.
Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: Using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9179-2.
Parong, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Learning science in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 785–797. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000241.
Peters, M., Laeng, B., Latham, K., Jackson, M., Zaiyouna, R., & Richardson, C. (1995). A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Test: Different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain and Cognition, 28(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1995.1032.
Pi, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhu, F., Xu, K., Yang, J., & Hu, W. (2019). Instructors’ pointing gestures improve learning regardless of their use of directed gaze in video lectures. Computers & Education, 128, 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.006.
Pilegard, C., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Game over for Tetris as a platform for cognitive skill training. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.04.003.
Redick, T. S., Shipstead, Z., Wiemers, E. A., Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2015). What’s working in working memory training? An educational perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9314-6.
Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2016). Sex and sex-role differences in specific cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 54, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.12.004.
Rey, G. D., Beege, M., Nebel, S., Wirzberger, M., Schmitt, T. H., & Schneider, S. (2019). A meta-analysis of the segmenting effect. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 389–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9456-4.
Sanchez, C. A. (2012). Enhancing visuospatial performance through video game training to increase learning in visuospatial science domains. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0177-7.
Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.440.
Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115(2), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336.
Schwartz, R. N., & Plass, J. L. (2014). Click versus drag: User-performed tasks and the enactment effect in an interactive multimedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.012.
Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.125.1.4.
Shepard, R. N., & Feng, C. (1972). A chronometric study of mental paper folding. Cognitive Psychology, 3(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90005-9.
Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(3972), 701–703. https://doi.org/10.2307/1731476.
Simons, D. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S. E., Chabris, C. F., Hambrick, D. Z., et al. (2016). Do “brain-training” programs work? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(3), 103–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100616661983.
Smirni, P., Villardita, C., & Zappalà, G. (1983). Influence of different paths on spatial memory performance in the Block-Tapping Test. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 5(4), 355–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638308401184.
Spence, I., & Feng, J. (2010). Video games and spatial cognition. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019491.
Spencer, S. J., Logel, C., & Davies, P. G. (2016). Stereotype threat. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-073115-103235.
Stericker, A., & LeVesconte, S. (1982). Effect of brief training on sex-related differences in visual–spatial skill. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 1018–1029. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.1018.
Stieff, M., & Uttal, D. H. (2015). How much can spatial training improve STEM achievement? Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 607–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9304-8.
Stull, A. T., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Learning by doing versus learning by viewing: Three experimental comparisons of learner-generated versus author-provided graphic organizers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 808–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.808.
Stull, A. T., Fiorella, L., Gainer, M. J., & Mayer, R. E. (2018a). Using transparent whiteboards to boost learning from online STEM lectures. Computers & Education, 120, 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.005.
Stull, A. T., Gainer, M. J., & Hegarty, M. (2018b). Learning by enacting: The role of embodiment in chemistry education. Learning and Instruction, 55, 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.008.
Sweller, J., & Sweller, S. (2006). Natural information processing systems. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 434–458.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5.
Triona, L. M., & Klahr, D. (2003). Point and click or grab and heft: Comparing the influence of physical and virtual instructional materials on elementary school students’ ability to design experiments. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 149–173.
Uttal, D. H., & Cohen, C. A. (2012). Spatial thinking and STEM education: When, why, and how? In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 57, pp. 147–181). San Diego: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394293-7.00004-2.
Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475–511. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314564881.
van Gog, T. (2014). The signaling (or cueing) principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 263–278). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.014.
Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(2), 599–604. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599.
Voyer, D., & Jansen, P. (2017). Motor expertise and performance in spatial tasks: A meta-analysis. Human Movement Science, 54, 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.04.004.
Voyer, D., Voyer, S. D., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2017). Sex differences in visual-spatial working memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(2), 307–334. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1085-7.
Vuoksimaa, E., Kaprio, J., Kremen, W. S., Hokkanen, L., Viken, R. J., Tuulio-Henriksson, A., et al. (2010). Having a male co-twin masculinizes mental rotation performance in females. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1069–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376075.
Wai, J., & Kell, H. J. (2017). What innovations have we already lost?: The importance of identifying and developing spatial talent. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Visual-spatial ability in STEM education: Transforming research into practice (pp. 109–124). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44385-0_6.
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016127.
Wexler, M., Kosslyn, S. M., & Berthoz, A. (1998). Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition, 68(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00032-8.
Wiegmann, D. A., Dansereau, D. F., McCagg, E. C., Rewey, K. L., & Pitre, U. (1992). Effects of knowledge map characteristics on information processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(92)90055-4.
Wilson, L., Scott, J. H., & Power, K. G. (1987). Developmental differences in the span of visual memory for pattern. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1987.tb01060.x.
Wittrock, M. C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24(4), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2404_2.
Wohlschläger, A., & Wohlschläger, A. (1998). Mental and manual rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(2), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.2.397.
Wong, M., Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2018). Investigating gender and spatial measurements in instructional animation research. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.017.
Wright, R., Thompson, W. L., Ganis, G., Newcombe, N. S., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2008). Training generalized spatial skills. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 763–771. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.4.763.
Acknowledgments
Support from PIA–CONICYT Basal Funds for Centers of Excellence Project FB0003, and CONICYT Fondecyt 11180255, is gratefully acknowledged. I am also thankful to Enrique Castro for his assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Castro-Alonso, J.C. (2019). Overview of Visuospatial Processing for Education in Health and Natural Sciences. In: Castro-Alonso, J. (eds) Visuospatial Processing for Education in Health and Natural Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20968-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20969-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)