Abstract
Hyper-sensitive moments in ethnographic fieldwork, such as family conferences whereby continuing or discontinuing treatment is discussed, or when sitting by a dying person’s bedside with family members, call into question the positionality of the researcher and research ethics. Participant observation at the end of life can evoke the sense of intruding in people’s most intimate moments. On the other hand, being present at a defining moment in life can strengthen the relationship with interlocutors precisely because this moment is shared. In my ethnographic research on the end of life of people with dementia in nursing homes in the Netherlands, the doorstep came to symbolize the emotional and methodological negotiations of proximity and distance, involvement, and detachment. How close are you allowed, how close do you dare, and how close is close enough to be empathetic? And what distance is enough to be respectful and modest? Thinking through these affective encounters, in this chapter I reflect on the ethnographic navigation of moments that require a particularly sensitive approach. I do not propagate an answer to the question of how to do research on death and dying, but aim at illustrating the affective states that come with ethnographic research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
I have anonymized interlocutors’ names for reasons of confidentiality.
References
Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. New York: Routledge.
Behar, R. (1996). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Boston: Beacon Press.
Bellah, R. N. (2007). Foreword. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Reflections on fieldwork in Morocco (30th anniversary ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published in 1977).
Borgstrom, E., & Ellis, J. (2017). Introduction: Researching death, dying and bereavement. Mortality, 22(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2017.1291600
Brodkin, K. (2011). Remember when writing was fun? Why academics should go on a low syllable, active voice diet. In A. Waterston & M. D. Vesperi (Eds.), Anthropology off the shelf: Anthropologists on writing (pp. 21–34). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Davies, J. (2010). Introduction: Emotions in the field. In J. Davies & D. Spencer (Eds.), Emotions in the field: The psychology and anthropology of fieldwork experience (pp. 1–31). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Fairfield, P. (2015). Death: A philosophical inquiry. London: Routledge.
Howarth, G. (2007). Death and dying: A sociological introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lemos Dekker, N. (2018). Moral frames for lives worth living: Managing the end of life with dementia. Death Studies, 42(5), 322–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2017.1396644
Lutz, C. A. (1998). Unnatural emotions: Everyday sentiments on a Micronesian atoll & their challenge to Western theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pool, R. (2000). Negotiating a good death. New York: Haworth Press.
Rabinow, P. (2007). Reflections on fieldwork in Morocco (30th anniversary ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published in 1977).
Rosaldo, R. (2004). Grief and a headhunter’s rage. In A. C. G. M. Robben (Ed.), Death, mourning, and burial: A cross-cultural reader (pp. 167–178). Malden: Blackwell Publishing. (Original work published in 1989).
Rosaldo, R. (2014). The day of Shelly’s death: The poetry and ethnography of grief. Durham: Duke University Press.
Stodulka, T. (2015). Emotion work, ethnography, and survival strategies on the streets of Yogyakarta. Medical Anthropology, 34(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2014.916706
Throop, C. J. (2012). On inaccessibility and vulnerability: Some horizons of compatibility between phenomenology and psychoanalysis. Ethos, 40(1), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2011.01232.x
Visser, R. C. (2017). “Doing death”: Reflecting on the researcher’s subjectivity and emotions. Death Studies, 41(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2016.1257877
Woodthorpe, K. (2011). Researching death: Methodological reflections on the management of critical distance. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.496576
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to all residents, family members, and professional care workers who shared their experiences with me and allowed me to be present in the day-to-day life of the nursing home and at the end of various residents’ lives. I am thankful to Kristine Krause for her great support and critical reading of the text. I also want to thank Kathrine van den Bogert for providing feedback on an earlier version of the text. Finally, I would like to acknowledge the support of Thomas Stodulka, Samia Dinkelaker, and Ferdiansyah Thajib and their efforts in bringing this edited volume together.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lemos Dekker, N. (2019). Standing at the Doorstep: Affective Encounters in Research on Death and Dying. In: Stodulka, T., Dinkelaker, S., Thajib, F. (eds) Affective Dimensions of Fieldwork and Ethnography. Theory and History in the Human and Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20831-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20831-8_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20830-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20831-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)