Abstract
To explore the richness that can be uncovered from personal stories, this chapter engages with the voice of a single student that would not normally be heard. The narrative is framed by a map-mediated interview, using the concept of pedagogic frailty as a framework to guide the discussion. The development of a student identity is hampered by conflicting discourses within higher education that consider issues such as widening participation and employability and tend to homogenise student voice. The chapter ends with a discussion of the importance of personal identity and how an individual may avoid being stereotyped or labelled by the establishment through adoption of a personal identity that avoids alignment with the unfavourable perception of a ‘privileged majority’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Behnejad, S. A. (2018). Engineering. In I. M. Kinchin & N. E. Winstone (Eds.), Exploring pedagogic frailty and resilience: Case studies of academic narrative (pp. 33–45). Leiden: Brill/Sense.
Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014). Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220–252.
Brown, A. R. (2011). Heavy genealogy: Mapping the currents, contraflows and conflicts of the emergent field of metal studies, 1978–2010. Journal for Cultural Research, 15(3), 213–242.
Buhmann, S. Y., & Kingsbury, M. (2015). A standardized holistic framework for concept map analysis combining topological attributes and global morphologies. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 7(1), 20–35.
Daniels, J., & Brooker, J. (2014). Student identity development in higher education: Implications for graduate attributes and work-readiness. Educational Research, 56(1), 65–76.
Darling, A. L., & Dannels, D. P. (2003). Practicing engineers talk about the importance of talk: A report on the role of oral communication in the workplace. Communication Education, 52(1), 1–16.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
Frankham, J. (2017). Employability and higher education: The follies of the ‘productivity challenge’ in the teaching excellence framework. Journal of Education Policy, 32(5), 628–641.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.
Godfrey, E., & Parker, L. (2010). Mapping the cultural landscape in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 5–22.
Hamshire, C., Forsyth, R., Bell, A., Benton, M., Kelly-Laubscher, R., Paxton, M., & Wolfgramm-Foliaki, E. (2017). The potential of student narratives to enhance quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 23(1), 50–64.
Heron, M., Medland, E., & Kinchin, I. M. (2018). Interview talk and the co-construction of concept maps. Educational Research, 60(4), 373–389.
Hines, M., & McFerran, K. S. (2014). Metal made me who I am: Seven adult men reflect on their engagement with metal music during adolescence. International Journal of Community Music, 7(2), 205–222.
Holmegaard, H. T., Madsen, L. M., & Ulriksen, L. (2014). To choose or not to choose science: Constructions of desirable identities among young people considering a STEM higher education programme. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 186–215.
Hood, S. (2015). Ethnographies on the move, stories on the rise: Methods in the humanities. In K. Maton, S. Hood, & S. Shay (Eds.), Knowledge-building: Educational studies in legitimation code theory (pp. 117–137). London: Routledge.
Hosein, A. (2017). The research-teaching nexus. In I. M. Kinchin & N. E. Winstone (Eds.), Pedagogic frailty and resilience in the university (pp. 135–149). Rotterdam: Sense.
Kandiko, C. B., & Kinchin, I. M. (2013). Student perspectives on research-rich teaching. Higher Education Research Network Journal, 6, 1–98.
Kinchin, I. M. (2017). Visualising the pedagogic frailty model as a frame for the scholarship of teaching and learning. PSU Research Review, 1(3), 184–193.
Kinchin, I. M., & Francis, R. A. (2017). Mapping pedagogic frailty in geography education: A framed autoethnographic case study. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(1), 56–74.
Kinchin, I. M., Lygo-Baker, S., & Hay, D. B. (2008). Universities as centres of non-learning. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 89–103.
Kinchin, I. M., & Winstone, N. E. (2017). Pedagogic frailty: Opportunities and challenges. In I. M. Kinchin & N. E. Winstone (Eds.), Pedagogic frailty and resilience in the university (pp. 211–225). Rotterdam: Sense.
Kinchin, I. M., & Winstone, N. E. (2018). Exploring pedagogic frailty and resilience: Case studies of academic narrative. Leiden: Brill/Sense.
Malott, C. (2006). From pirates to punk rockers: Pedagogies of insurrection and revolution: The unity of Utopia. Critical Journal of Education Policy Studies, 4(1), 159–170.
Manathunga, C., Selkrig, M., Sadler, K., & Keamy, K. (2017). Rendering the paradoxes and pleasures of academic life: Using images, poetry and drama to speak back to the measured university. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(3), 526–540.
Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2012). Leaving engineering: A multi-year single institution study. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 6–27.
Mavelli, L. (2014). Widening participation, the instrumentalization of knowledge and the reproduction of inequality. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(8), 860–869.
McLeod, J. (2011). Student voice and the politics of listening in higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 52(2), 179–189.
Moreau, M. P., & Leathwood, C. (2006). Graduates’ employment and the discourse of employability: A critical analysis. Journal of Education and Work, 19(4), 305–324.
Oancea, A., Florez Petour, T., & Atkinson, J. (2017). Qualitative network analysis tools for the configurative articulation of cultural value and impact from research. Research Evaluation, 26(4), 302–315.
O’Leary, S. (2017). Graduates’ experiences of, and attitudes towards, the inclusion of employability-related support in undergraduate degree programmes; trends and variations by subject discipline and gender. Journal of Education and Work, 30(1), 84–105.
Oliver, B., & de St Jorre, T. J. (2018). Graduate attributes for 2020 and beyond: Recommendations for Australian higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 821–836.
Rainford, J. (2017). Targeting of widening participation measures by elite institutions: Widening access or simply aiding recruitment? Perspectives, Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 21(2–3), 45–50.
Rowe, P. (2017). Becoming metal: Narrative reflections on the early formation and embodiment of heavy metal identities. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(6), 713–731.
Sabri, D. (2011). What’s wrong with ‘the student experience’? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(5), 657–667.
Snell, D., & Hodgetts, D. (2007). Heavy metal, identity and the social negotiation of a community of practice. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17, 430–445.
Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tymon, A. (2013). The student perspective on employability. Studies in Higher Education, 38(6), 841–856.
Ulriksen, L., Holmegaard, H. T., & Madsen, L. M. (2017). Making sense of curriculum—The transition into science and engineering university programmes. Higher Education, 73, 423–440.
Wilkins, A., & Burke, P. J. (2015). Widening participation in higher education: The role of professional and social class identities and commitments. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(3), 434–452.
Wilson, J., Mandich, A., & Magalhães, L. (2015). Concept mapping: A dynamic, individualized and qualitative method for eliciting meaning. Qualitative Health Research, 26(8), 1151–1161.
Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Rowntree, J., & Parker, M. (2017). ‘It’d be useful, but I wouldn’t use it’: Barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipience. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 2026–2041.
Wolff, K., & Luckett, K. (2013). Integrating multidisciplinary engineering knowledge. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(1), 78–92.
Yorke, M. (2004). Employability in the undergraduate curriculum: Some student perspectives. European Journal of Education, 39(4), 409–427.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kinchin, I.M., Kinchin, A.M. (2019). Finding an Identity in the Crowd: A Single-Case Framed Narrative of Being in the Invisible Majority. In: Lygo-Baker, S., Kinchin, I., Winstone, N. (eds) Engaging Student Voices in Higher Education . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20824-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20824-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20823-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20824-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)