Skip to main content

Teaching Effectiveness: An Innovative Evaluation Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Learning Technology for Education Challenges (LTEC 2019)

Abstract

The evaluation of teaching effectiveness is an important process of higher educational institutions. Having regulations, policies and procedures that guide the teaching activity strengthens the quality of teaching. There are several teaching effectiveness evaluation models that have been applied, each one with their own particularities, objectives and supporting tools. Furthermore, there are numerous studies about their validity, metrics, weighting, properties collection, among others. One of the main inputs for teaching evaluation is the student’s achievement, in addition to the qualitative assessment done by expert peers. With this baseline, we intend to design a new evaluation model capable of evaluating teaching quality. The model focuses on the instructor’s educational capacities that include innovative metrics that will allow the evaluation of his/her competences from a nonobjective perspective. To support the application of the model, we have designed an architecture where we integrate Semantic Technologies and Machine Learning algorithms for knowledge representation and information processing. As a result, we expect that the final system will be able to measure the effectiveness of the teaching activity of each professor and to identify potential problems in the applied teaching method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wächter, B., Kelo, M.: University quality indicators: a critical assessment. European Parliament, Brussels (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Astin, A.W., Lising, A.: Assesment for Excellence: The Philosophy and Practice of Assesment and Evaluation in Higher Education. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., Lanham (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berk, R.A.: Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ. 17, 48–62 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duffy, B., Smith, K., Terhanian, G., Bremer, J.: Comparing data from online and face-to-face surveys. Int. J. Mark. Res. 47(6), 615–639 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alenoush, S., Cheryl, A.: Evaluating university teaching: time to take stock. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 26(4), 341–353 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heneman, H., Kimball, S., Milanowski, A.: The Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale: Validation Evidence and Behavioral Prediction. WCER, Wisconsin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ita, G., Kreft, G.: Using multilevel analysis to assess school effectiveness: a study of Dutch secondary schools. Am. Sociol. Rev. 66(2), 104–129 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Darling-Hammond, L., Amrein-Beardsley, A., Haertel, E., Rothstein, J.: Evaluating Teacher Evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan 93, 8–15 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bates, W.T., Sangrá, A.: Managing Technology in Higher Education: Strategies for Transforming Teaching and Learning. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, S.: Ontology of learning objects repository for pedagogical knowledge sharing. Interdisc. J. E-Learn. Learn. Object. 4, 39–57 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stojanovic, L., Staab, S., Studer, R.: eLearning basad on the Semantic Web (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kotsiantis, S.: Use of machine learning techniques for educational proposes: a decision support system for forecasting students’ grades. Artif. Intell. Rev. 37, 331–344 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dochy, F., Segers, M., Sluijsmans, D.: The use of self peer and coassessment in higher education: a review. Stud. High. Educ. 24, 331–350 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rizzo Irfan, M., Ali Fauzi, M., Tibyani, T., Mentari, N.D.: Twitter sentiment analysis on 2013 curriculum using ensemble features and K-Nearest neighbor. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 8(6), 5409–5414 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cunha, J., Trey, M.: Measuring value-added in higher education: possibilities and limitations in the use of administrative data. Elsevier 42, 64–77 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xin, M., Klinger, D.A.: Hierarchical linear modelling of student and school effects on academic achievement. Can. J. Edu. 269, 41–55 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Galán, A., Amilburu, M.G., Muñoz, I.: The effects of implementing the ESHE on the assessment of teaching. Revista catalana de dret públic 44, 349–370 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yeh, S.: The Cost Effectiveness of NBPTS Teacher Certification. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Standards, National Board for Professional Teaching, Guide to National Board Certification, Pearson (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goe, L., Bell, C., Little, O.: Approaches to Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness A Research Synthesis. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Devedzic, V.: Education and the semantic web. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 14, 39–65 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ingvarson, L., Rowe, K.: Conceptualising and evaluating teacher quality: substantive and methodological issues. Australian Council for Educational Research ACEReSearch (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Work partially supported by the Autonomous Region of Madrid (grants “MOSI-AGIL-CM” (S2013/ICE-3019) co-funded by EU Structural Funds FSE and FEDER and Talent Attraction Program (“2017-T2/TIC-5664”)), project “SURF” (TIN2015-65515-C4-4-R (MINECO/FEDER)) funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, and through the Excellence Research Group GES2ME (Ref. 30VCPIGI05) co-funded by URJC-Santander Bank.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Orozco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Orozco, W., Rodríguez-García, M.Á., Fernández, A. (2019). Teaching Effectiveness: An Innovative Evaluation Model. In: Uden, L., Liberona, D., Sanchez, G., Rodríguez-González, S. (eds) Learning Technology for Education Challenges. LTEC 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1011. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20798-4_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20798-4_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20797-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20798-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics