Skip to main content

Place-Based Data, Methods, and Analysis: Past, Present, and Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook on Crime and Deviance

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

Place-based research in criminology considers the micro-place (street segments, for example) as the unit of analysis. Though research considering criminal events, or police calls for service, occurring at the micro-place has a long history, the contemporary “crime and place” literature that considers citywide analyses of criminal events or police calls for service emerged 30 years ago. This research has shown that the micro-place is an important component of understanding the spatial dimension of criminal events, both descriptively and inferentially. In this chapter, we review the crime and place literature, considering place-based data, methods, and forms of analysis. We discuss the significant strides that have been made within the spatial criminology literature using a place-based approach, but conclude that there remains work to be done to move the field forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andresen, M. A. (2006). A spatial analysis of crime in Vancouver, British Columbia: A synthesis of social disorganization and routine activity theory. Canadian Geographer, 50(4), 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A. (2009). Testing for similarity in area-based spatial patterns: A nonparametric Monte Carlo approach. Applied Geography, 29(3), 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A. (2010). Canada–United States interregional trade: Quasi-points and spatial change. Canadian Geographer, 54(2), 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A. (2011). The ambient population and crime analysis. Professional Geographer, 63(2), 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A. (2014). Environmental criminology: Evolution, theory, and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A. (2016). An area-based nonparametric spatial point pattern test: The test, its applications, and the future. Methodological Innovations, 9, Article 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A., Curman, A. S. N., & Linning, S. J. (2017). The trajectories of crime at places: Understanding the patterns of disaggregated crime types. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(3), 427–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A., & Hodgkinson, T. (2018a). Predicting property crime risk: An application of risk terrain modeling in Vancouver, Canada. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research24(4), 373–392.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A., & Hodgkinson, T. (2018b). Evaluating the impact of police foot patrol at the micro-geographic level. Policing: An International Journal, 41(3), 314–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A., & Linning, S. J. (2012). The (in)appropriateness of aggregating across crime types. Applied Geography, 35(1–2), 275–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A., Linning, S. J., & Malleson, N. (2017). Crime at places and spatial concentrations: Exploring the spatial stability of property crime in Vancouver BC, 2003–2013. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(2), 255–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A., & Malleson, N. (2011). Testing the stability of crime patterns: Implications for theory and policy. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(1), 58–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A., & Malleson, N. (2013a). Crime seasonality and its variations across space. Applied Geography, 43, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A., & Malleson, N. (2013b). Spatial heterogeneity in crime analysis. In M. Leitner (Ed.), Crime modeling and mapping using geospatial technologies (pp. 3–23). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A., & Malleson, N. (2014). Police foot patrol and crime displacement: A local analysis. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 30(2), 186–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andruff, H., Carraro, N., Thompson, A., Gaudreau, P., & Louvet, B. (2009). Latent class growth modelling: A tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 5(1), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernasco, W., & Steenbeek, W. (2017). More places than crimes: Implications for evaluating the law of crime concentration at place. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(3), 451–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. J. (1970). Production of crime rates. American Sociological Review, 35(4), 733–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. A., Andresen, M. A., & Lawton, B. (Eds.). (2017). Special issue: The law of crime concentration at places. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(3), 421–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A., Hureau, D. M., & Papachristos, A. V. (2010). The concentration and stability of gun violence at micro places in Boston, 1980–2008. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A., Hureau, D. M., & Papachristos, A. V. (2011). The relevance of micro places to citywide robbery trends: A longitudinal analysis of robbery incidents at street corners and block faces in Boston. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(1), 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulwer, H. L. (1836). France, social, literary, political, volume I, book I: Crime. London, UK: Richard Bentley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calinski, T., & Harabasz, J. (1974). A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics, 3(1), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccato, V., & Lukyte, N. (2011). Safety and sustainability in a city in transition: The case of Vilnius, Lithuania. Cities, 28(1), 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curman, A. S. N., Andresen, M. A., & Brantingham, P. J. (2015). Crime and place: A longitudinal examination of street segment patterns in Vancouver, BC. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(1), 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, J.-D. (2017). Homicide in Canada, 2016. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. E., & Weisburd, D. (1995). Crime places in crime theory. Crime Prevention Studies, 4, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston, E. P., Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2004). Methodological sensitivities to latent class analysis of long-term criminal trajectories. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, G., Tilley, N., & Tseloni, A. (2015). Why the crime drop? Crime Justice: An Annual Review of Research, 43, 421–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, G., Tseloni, A., Mailley, J., & Tilley, N. (2011). The crime drop and the security hypothesis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(2), 147–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2010). The great reset: How new ways of living and working drive post-crash prosperity. Toronto, ON: Vintage Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst, B. (2004). Errors of justice: Nature, sources and remedies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A. (2005). Analysis of variance: Why it is more important than ever. The Annals of Statistics, 33(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genolini, C., & Falissard, B. (2010). KmL: K-means for longitudinal data. Computational Statistics, 25(2), 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, C., Wooditch, A., & Weisburd, D. (2017). Testing the “Law of Crime Concentration at Place” in a suburban setting: Implications for research and practice. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(3), 519–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, E., & Chavez, J. M. (2004). Communities, street guns, and homicide in Chicago, 1980–1995: Merging methods for examining homicide trends across space and time. Criminology, 42(4), 941–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groff, E. R., Weisburd, D., & Yang, S.-M. (2010). Is it important to examine crime trends at a local “micro” level? A longitudinal analysis of street to street variability in crime trajectories. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(1), 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, C. P., Sorg, E. T., & Ratcliffe, J. H. (2017). Assessing the validity of the law of crime concentration across different temporal scales. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(3), 547–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibdon, J., Telep, C. W., & Groff, E. R. (2017). The concentration and stability of drug activity in Seattle, Washington using police and emergency medical services data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(3), 497–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipp, J. R., & Kim, Y.-A. (2017). Measuring crime concentration across cities of varying sizes: Complications based on the spatial and temporal scale employed. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(3), 595–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, T., & Andresen, M.A. (2019). Changing spatial patterns of residential burglary and the crime drop: The need for spatial data signatures. Journal of Criminal Justice, 61, 90–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, T., Andresen, M. A., & Farrell, G. (2016). The decline and locational shift of automotive theft: A local level analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 44(1), 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, D., Esbensen, F., & Weiher, A. W. (1991). Are there multiple paths to delinquency? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82(1), 83–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, L. W., & Forde, D. R. (1990). Routine activities and crime: An analysis of victimization in Canada. Criminology, 28(1), 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, D. A., & Bridges, G. S. (1997). Measurement error in calls-for-service as an indicator of crime. Criminology, 35(4), 705–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubrin, C. E., & Herting, J. (2003). Neighborhood correlates of homicide trends: An analysis using growth-curve modeling. Sociological Quarterly, 44(3), 329–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees, L., Slater, T., & Wyly, E. K. (2007). Gentrification. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A., Rosenfeld, R., & Deckard, M. (2017). The law of crime concentration: An application and recommendations for future research. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(3), 635–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linning, S. J. (2015). Crime seasonality and the micro-spatial patterns of property crime in Vancouver, BC and Ottawa, ON. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(6), 544–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo, S. N., Matias, L. F., & Andresen, M. A. (2015). Crime concentrations and similarities in spatial crime patterns in a Brazilian context. Applied Geography, 62, 314–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowder, M. H., Cummings, J. A., & McKinney, R. (2010). Resiliency scales for children and adolescents: Profiles of juvenile offenders. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28(4), 326–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D. (1999). Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semiparametric group-based approach. Psychological Methods, 4(2), 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D. (2004). Response to “Methodological sensitivities to latent class analysis of long-term criminal trajectories”. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20(1), 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D. (2005). Group-based modeling of development over the life course. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D. S., & Land, K. C. (1993). Age, criminal careers and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology, 31(3), 327–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, D. T., & Winship, C. (2017). The gains of greater granularity: The presence and persistence of problem properties in urban neighborhoods. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(3), 649–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, D. V. S., Mota, C. M. M., & Andresen, M. A. (2016). The homicide drop in Recife, Brazil: A study of crime concentrations and spatial patterns. Homicide Studies, 21(1), 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perreault, S. (2015). Criminal victimization in Canada, 2014. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perreault, S., & Brennan, S. (2010). Criminal victimization in Canada, 2009. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, J. H. (2004). Geocoding crime and a first estimate of a minimum acceptable hit rate. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18(1), 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnell, C., Braga, A. A., & Piza, E. L. (2017). The influence of community areas, neighborhood clusters, and street segments on the spatial variability of violent crime in Chicago. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(3), 469–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1931). Social factors in juvenile delinquency. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: A study of rates of delinquency in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1969). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: A study of rates of delinquency in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities (revised edition). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. R., Zorbaugh, F., McKay, H. D., & Cottrell, L. S. (1929). Delinquency areas: A study of the geographic distribution of school truants, juvenile delinquents, and adult offenders in Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P., & Buerger, M. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27(1), 27–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. D., & Willet, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. R., Frazee, S. G., & Davison, E. L. (2000). Furthering the integration of routine activity and social disorganization theories: Small units of analysis and the study of street robbery as a diffusion process. Criminology, 38(2), 489–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenbeek, W., Vandeviver, C., Andresen, M. A., Malleson, N., & Wheeler, A. (2018). sppt: Spatial Point Pattern Test. R package version (0.1.5, 0.1.6). Retrieved from: https://github.com/wsteenbeek/sppt.

  • Steenbeek, W., & Weisburd, D. (2016). Where the action is in crime? An examination of variability of crime across spatial units in The Hague, 2001–2009. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(3), 449–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompson, L., Johnson, S., Ashby, M., Perkins, C., & Edwards, P. (2015). UK open source crime data: Accuracy and possibilities for research. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 42(2), 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandeviver, C., & Steenbeek, W. (2019). The (in)stability of residential burglary patterns on street segments: The case of Antwerp, Belgium 2005–2016. Journal of Quantitative Criminology35(1), 111–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, A., Hewitt, A., Andresen, M. A., & Brantingham, P. L. (2016). Exploring the role of the environmental context in the spatial distribution of calls-for-service associated with emotionally disturbed persons. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 10(2), 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D. (2015). The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology, 53(2), 133–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., & Amram, S. (2014). The law of concentrations of crime at place: The case of Tel Aviv-Jaffa. Police Practice and Research, 15(2), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., Bushway, S., Lum, C., & Yang, S.-M. (2004). Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the City of Seattle. Criminology, 42(2), 283–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., Groff, E. R., & Yang, S.-M. (2012). The criminology of place: Street segments and our understanding of the crime problem. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., Morris, N. A., & Groff, E. R. (2009). Hot spots of juvenile crime: A longitudinal study of arrest incidents at street segments in Seattle, Washington. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25(4), 443–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, A. P., Steenbeek, W., & Andresen, M. A. (2018). Testing for similarity in area-based spatial patterns: Alternative methods to Andresen’s spatial point pattern test. Transactions in GIS, 22(3), 760–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, A. P., Worden, R. E., & McLean, S. J. (2016). Replicating group-based trajectory models of crime at micro-places in Albany, NY. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(4), 589–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M. E., Figlio, R. M., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquency in a birth cohort. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X., & Lum, C. (2017). Measuring the spatial and temporal patterns of police proactivity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(4), 915–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuschke, K. E., Andresen, M. A., Brantingham, P. J., Rattenbury, C., & Richards, A. (2018). What do police do and where do they do it? International Journal of Police Science and Management, 20(1), 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin A. Andresen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Andresen, M.A., Hodgkinson, T. (2019). Place-Based Data, Methods, and Analysis: Past, Present, and Future. In: Krohn, M., Hendrix, N., Penly Hall, G., Lizotte, A. (eds) Handbook on Crime and Deviance. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20779-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20779-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20778-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20779-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics