Skip to main content

Managing AI Within a Digital Density Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of Management in an AI World

Part of the book series: IESE Business Collection ((IESEBC))

  • 4024 Accesses

Abstract

AI is a new technology that enables organizations to leverage their data to create new value propositions for customers. Javier Zamora argues that the introduction of AI in any organization translates into new business challenges, because the data, both as input, as well as output of AI models, requires a specific governance. In this chapter, Zamora presents a holistic framework on the use of data and AI algorithms. He also outlines some comprehensive guidelines that general managers should follow to achieve a good AI governance within a digital density framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    General Data Protection Regulation focuses specifically on protecting data and ensuring its privacy. Any organization operating within EU will be obliged to gather data legally and under strict conditions and protect it from misuse by third parties, otherwise it will be fined. Organizations are required to use the highest privacy settings, so that the data does not become public. GDPR empowers individuals to challenge organizations to reveal or delete their personal data.

  2. 2.

    In this context, bias does not refer to its statistical meaning but to the inclination or prejudice for or against one person or group, especially in a way considered to be unfair.

References

  • Agrawal, A., J. Gans, and A. Goldfarb. 2018. Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. 2006. The Long Tail. Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More. London: Hyperion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreu, R., and Ricart, J.E. 2014. The Genuine Responsibilities of the CEO. IESE Insight 23 (Fourth Quarter): 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anwin, J., et al. 2016. Machine Bias. ProPublica, May. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing. Accessed January 31, 2019.

  • Asimov, I. 1950. I, Robot. New York: Gnome Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, A., et al. 2016. Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation for Deep Neural Network Architectures. In Proceeding of Information Science and Applications (ICISA), 913–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, N. 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buolamwini, J., and Gebru, T. 2018. Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. In Proceedings of Machine Research, Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casadesus-Masanell, R., and Ricart, J.E. 2011. How to Design a Winning Business Model. Harvard Business Review 89 (1/2): 100–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, A., M.C. Tschantz, and A. Datta. 2015. Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Setting. In Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 92–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty, P.P., and H.J. Wilson. 2018. Human + Machine: Reimagining Work in the Age of AI. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domingos, P. 2015. The Master Algorithm. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doshi-Velez, F., and M. Kortz. 2017. Accountability of AI Under the Law: The Role of Explanation. Working Paper, Berkman Klein Center Working Group on Explanation and the Law, Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. 1973. Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmond, A. 2017. Moral Machine: Perception of Moral Judgement Made by Machines. Masther’s Thesis, MIT, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • ET City Brain. 2018. Alibaba Cloud. https://www.alibabacloud.com/et/city. Accessed December 27, 2018.

  • Etzione, O. 2017. How to Regulate Artificial Intelligence. The New York Times, September. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/01/opinion/artificial-intelligence-regulations-rules.html. Accessed December 27, 2018.

  • Eykholt, K., et al. 2018. Robust Physical-World Attacks on Deep Learning Visual Classification. In Proceeding of the Conference of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1625–1634, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • FATE: Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics in AI. 2018. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/group/fate/. Accessed December 27, 2018.

  • FAT/ML: Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in Machine Learning. 2018. https://www.fatml.org/. Accessed December 27, 2018.

  • Future of Life Institute. 2017. Asilomar AI Principles. https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles/. Accessed December 27, 2018.

  • Health eHeart. 2018. https://www.health-eheartstudy.org/study. Accessed December 27, 2018.

  • Hursthouse, R., and G. Pettigrove. 2018. Virtue Ethics. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, Winter 2018 ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/ethics-virtue/. Accessed January 20, 2019.

  • IBM Watson. 2018. Trust and Transparency in AI. https://www.ibm.com/watson/trust-transparency/. Accessed December 27, 2018.

  • INTEL. 2017. Artificial Intelligence: The Public Opportunity. https://blogs.intel.com/policy/files/2017/10/Intel-Artificial-Intelligence-Public-Policy-White-Paper-2017.pdf.

  • Káganer, E., J. Zamora, and S. Sieber. 2013. The Digital Mindset: 5 Skills Every Leader Needs to Succeed in the Digital World. IESE Insight Review (18, Third Quarter): 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandani, A., A.J. Kimz, and A.W. Lo. 2010. Consumer Credit Risk Models via Machine-Learning Algorithms. Journal of Banking & Finance 34 (11): 2767–2787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. 2018. Superminds. New York: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, C. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction. New York: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., and Y. Pigneur. 2010. Business Model Generation. A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers. New York: Willey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. 1979. How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review 57 (2): 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricart, J.E. 2012. Strategy in the 21st Century: Business Models in Action. IESE Technical Note, SMN-685-E.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C., and I. Swetlitz. 2018. IBM’s Watson Supercomputer Recommended ‘Unsafe and Incorrect’ Cancer Treatments, Internal Documents Show. STAT, July. https://www.statnews.com/2018/07/25/ibm-watson-recommended-unsafe-incorrect-treatments/. Accessed December 27, 2018.

  • Sieber, S., and J. Zamora. 2019. The Cybersecurity Challenge in a High Digital Density World. The European Business Review, January–February: 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, I. 2013. IBM’s Watson Is Better at Diagnosing Cancer Than Human Doctors. Wired, February. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/ibm-watson-medical-doctor. Accessed December 27, 2018.

  • Sutcliffe, H., and A. Allgrove. 2018. How Do We Build an Ethical Framework for the Fourth Industrial Revolution? World Economic Forum, November. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/11/ethical-framework-fourth-industrial-revolution/. Accessed December 1, 2018.

  • Thomson, J. 1976. Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem. Monist: An International Quarterly Journal of General Philosophical Inquiry 59: 204–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, J.M. 2018. Data for Good: FATES, Elaborated. Data Science Institute, Columbia University, January. https://datascience.columbia.edu/FATES-Elaborated. Accessed December 27, 2018.

  • Wrzeszczynski, K., et al. 2017. Comparing Sequencing Assays and Human-Machine Analyses in Actionable Genomics for Glioblastoma. Neurology Genetics 3 (4): e164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamora, J. 2016. Making Better Decisions Using Big Data. Harvard Deusto Business Review, May: 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamora, J. 2017. Programming Business Models Through Digital Density. IESE Insight (Second Quarter): 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamora, J., and P. Herrera. 2018. How Prepared Is Your Business to Make the Most of AI? IESE Business School Insight (151, Winter): 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamora, J., K. Tatarinov, and S. Sieber. 2018. The Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces Affecting the Digital Transformation of Industries. Harvard Deusto Business Review (279): 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier Zamora .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zamora, J. (2020). Managing AI Within a Digital Density Framework. In: Canals, J., Heukamp, F. (eds) The Future of Management in an AI World. IESE Business Collection. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20680-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics