Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of Enterprise Emission Inventory Considering Entropy Production for a Cement Production Line

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Environmentally-Benign Energy Solutions

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

  • 1004 Accesses

Abstract

The cement sector, which has a high energy consumption in the industrial sector, has significant environmental pollutant potential and besides high energy costs. In the sectoral evaluations, in addition to the efficient and efficient use of energy, alternative studies have become a necessity to eliminate such threats. The energy consumption behavior of this sector, especially fossil source, can be considered as an important environmental impact due to low system efficiency. In this context, irreversibility, which can be seen as the production of entropy in the thermodynamic process, will directly affect the emission potential with thermal effect. In this study, entropy production of the cement production line was examined with exergy analysis, and the losses due to irreversibility were evaluated. The potential of the enterprise emission inventory is then investigated for this potential, which is generally considered to be thermal irreversibility. According to the analysis, the analysis of the process was found at 56.92%. Along with the fossil fuel consumption estimates, CO2 emission potentials represent 0.40% of the cumulative total. At the end of the study, some suggestions were made to improve the environmental and economic effects of reducing the potentials reached according to the analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

\(\dot{E}\) :

Energy rate (MW)

\(\dot{E}x\) :

Exergy rate (MW)

\(\dot{Q}\) :

Heat rate (MW)

\(\dot{W}\) :

Work rate (MW)

\(\dot{m}\) :

Mass flow rate (kg s−1)

h :

Specific enthalpy (kJ kg−1)

P :

Pressure (kPa)

T :

Temperature (K)

ex:

Specific exergy (MJ kg−1)

ke:

Specific kinetic energy (kJ kg−1)

pe:

Specific potential energy (kJ kg−1)

s :

Specific entropy (kJ kg−1 K−1)

\({\eta_{II}}\) :

Exergy efficiency

0 :

Ambient conditions

dest:

Destruction

in:

Inlet

mass:

Mass transfer related

out:

Outlet

work:

Work related

ch:

Chemical

ke:

Kinetic

pot:

Potential

ph:

Physical

th:

Thermal

References

  1. Marland G, Boden T (2015) Global, regional and national fossil-fuel CO2 emissions. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Worrell E, Galitsky C (2004, January) Energy efficiency improvement opportunities for cement making. Environmental Energy Technologies Division, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schumacher K, Sathaye J (1999, July) India’s Cement Industry: productivity, energy efficiency and carbon emissions and environmental energy technologies division. The Environmental Science Division, Office Of Biological And Environmental Research, Office Of Energy Research, U.S. Department Of Energy

    Google Scholar 

  4. Meng Y, Ling TC, Mo KH, Tian W (2019, June 25) Enhancement of high temperature performance of cement blocks via CO2 curing, Sci Total Environ 671:827–837. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ahdaya M, Imqam A (2019, May) Investigating geopolymer cement performance in presence of water based drilling fluid, J Pet Science Eng 176:934–942

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffmann B, Häfele S, Karl U (2013) Analysis of performance losses of thermal power plants in Germany—a system dynamics model approach using data from regional climate modelling. Energy 49:193–203. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karakus AA, Boyar S, Akdeniz RC, Hepbasli A (2002) An exergy analysis in a mixed feed industry: evaluation of an extruder pellet line. In: EE&AE’2002—International scientific conference, Rousse, Bulgaria, 04–06.04.2002

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sogut Z (2012) A research on exergy consumption and potential of total CO2 emission in the Turkish cement sector. Energy Conv Manag 56:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sogut Z, Oktay Z(2008) Energy and exergy analyses in a thermal process of a production line for a cement factory and applications. Int J Exergy 5:218–240

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sheinbaum C, Ozawa L (1998) Energy use and CO2 emissions for Mexico’s cement industry. Energy 23(9):725–732

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zaim KK (1996) Emissions due to fossil-fuel consumption and cement production in Turkey (1970–1991). Energy 21:325–331

    Google Scholar 

  12. Loreti Group (2008) Greenhouse gas emission reductions from blended cement production. Retrieved on November 10, 2009 from https://www.climateactionreserve.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/future-protocol-development_blended-cement.pdf

  13. Çevik B (2016, May) Cement sector, Türkiye İş Bank., Department of Economic Research. https://ekonomi.isbank.com.tr/UserFiles/pdf/sr201604_CimentoSektoru.pdf

  14. Yusuf K (2015) TR63 section cement sector report, Eastern Mediterranean Development Agency, Hatay. http://www.dogaka.gov.tr/Icerik/Dosya/www.dogaka.gov.tr_626_KN2F58CG_cimento-Sektor-Raporu-2015.pdf

  15. Robbie M (2018) Andrew Global CO2 emissions from cement production. Earth Syst. Sci. 10:195–217. https://www.earth-syst-sci-data.net/10/195/2018/essd-10-195-2018.pdf

  16. ECA (2007) Activity report 2006. The European Cement Association. retrieved from the Cembureau website http://www.cembureau.be/Documents/Publications/ActivityReport2006.pdf

  17. Ritchie H, Roser M (2019) CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from:’https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions. (Online Resource)

  18. Boden TA, Andres RJ, Marland G (2017) Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., USA, last Access: 28 June 2017, available at: http://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov/trends/emis/meth_reg.html

  19. IEA: energy technology perspectives 2016: towards sustainable urban energy systems,.International Energy Agency, Paris, ISBN 978-92-64-25233-2, (last access: 8 September 2014), 2016, available at: www.iea.org/etp2016

  20. Le Quéré C, Andrew RM, Friedlingstein P, Sitch S, Pongratz J, Manning AC, Korsbakken JI, Peters GP, Canadell JG, Jackson RB, Boden TA, Tans PP, Andrews OD, Arora VK, Bakker DCE, Barbero L, Becker M, Betts RA, Bopp L, Chevallier F, Chini LP, Ciais P, Cosca CE, Cross J, Currie K, Gasser T, Harris I, Hauck J, Haverd V, Houghton RA, Hunt CW, Hurtt G, Ilyina T, Jain AK, Kato E, Kautz M, Keeling RF, Klein Goldewijk K, Körtzinger A, Landschützer P, Lefèvre N, Lenton A, Lienert S, Lima I, Lombardozzi D, Metzl N, Millero F, Monteiro PMS, Munro DR, Nabel JEMS, Nakaoka S-I, Nojiri Y, Padìn XA, Peregon A, Pfeil B, Pierrot D, Poulter B, Rehder G, Reimer J, Rödenbeck C, Schwinger J, Séférian R, Skjelvan I, Stocker BD, Tian H, Tilbrook B, van der LaanLuijkx IT, van der Werf GR, van Heuven S, Viovy N, Vuichard N, Walker AP, Watson AJ, Wiltshire AJ, Zaehle S, Zhu D (2017) Global Carbon Budget 2017. Earth Syst Sci Data Discuss https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2017-123. In review

  21. Beverage Group (2010) Beverage Industry Sector Guidance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting. Beverage Industry Environmental Roundtable January 2010, UK. https://www.fcrn.org.uk/sites/default/files/Beverage_Industry_Sector_Guidance_for_GHG_Emissions_Reporting_v2.0.pdf

  22. Cengel AY, Boles MA (2005) Thermodynamics: an engineering approach. McGraw-Hill Science

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cornelissen RL (1997) Thermodynamics and sustainable development: the use of exergy analysis and the reduction of irreversibility. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kotas TJ (1985) The exergy method of thermal plant analysis, Tiptree. Anchor Brendon Ltd., Essex

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wall G (2003) Exergy tools. In: Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers. Wilson Applied Science &Technology Abstracts Plus Text, 125–136

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rosen MA, Dincer I (2004) Exergy as a driver achieving sustainability. Int J Green Energy 1(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kilkis SA (2009) A rational exergy management model for sustainable buildings to reduce compound CO2 emissions. In: Proceedings of 40th congress on HVAC&R e KGH, 2009, pp 391–412

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Maritime Faculty, Piri Reis University, Tuzla, Istanbul, Turkey

    M. Ziya Sogut

  2. Institute of Ecological Safety, National Aviation University, Kiev, Ukraine

    Kateryna Synylo

  3. Department of Airframe and Powerplant Maintenance, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Eskişehir Technical University, 26470, Eskisehir, Turkey

    T. Hikmet Karakoc

Authors
  1. M. Ziya Sogut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kateryna Synylo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Hikmet Karakoc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Ziya Sogut .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, ON, Canada

    Ibrahim Dincer

  2. Dokuz Eylul University, Buca, Izmir, Turkey

    Can Ozgur Colpan

  3. Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dokuz Eylul University, Buca, Izmir, Turkey

    Mehmet Akif Ezan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sogut, M.Z., Synylo, K., Karakoc, T.H. (2020). Assessment of Enterprise Emission Inventory Considering Entropy Production for a Cement Production Line. In: Dincer, I., Colpan, C., Ezan, M. (eds) Environmentally-Benign Energy Solutions. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20637-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20637-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20636-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20637-6

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation