Skip to main content

Energy, Exergy and Environmental Analyses of Biomass Gasifier Combined Integrated Plant

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Environmentally-Benign Energy Solutions

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

  • 996 Accesses

Abstract

The fundamental purpose of this chapter is to examine a novel renewable energy supported combined plant. The suggested chapter occurs with biomass gasifier unit, gas turbine system, Rankine cycle, single-effect absorption cycle, hydrogen generation unit, dryer cycle, and hot-water production unit. This chapter is designed and developed for useful outputs, such as heating, cooling, electricity, hydrogen, drying and hot water with a single biomass energy input. In this context, detailed energy and exergy efficiency, and also environmental effect analyses are carried out with Engineering Equation Solver software. The effects of environment and gasification temperatures and biomass mass flow rate changes on the plant performance and on carbon emissions are investigated and presented as graphs. Results display that the energetic and exergetic efficiency of integrated plant are found as 63.84 and 59.26%. Also, the overall hydrogen generation and exergy destruction rate are 0.068 kg/s and 52,529 kW, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

E :

Energy (kJ)

\(\dot{E}\) :

Energy rate (kW)

\(\dot{E}x\) :

Exergy rate (kW)

ex:

Exergy

h :

Specific enthalpy (kJ/kg)

P :

Pressure (kPa)

s :

Specific entropy (kJ/kg-K)

T :

Temperature (°C-K)

\(\dot{m}\) :

Mass flow rate (kW)

\(\dot{Q}\) :

Heat transfer rate (kW)

\(\dot{W}\) :

Work rate (kW)

\(\eta\) :

Energy efficiency

\(\psi\) :

Exergy efficiency

ε :

Emission rate

BGS:

Biomass gasification system

cogen:

Cogeneration

DC:

Dryer cycle

e :

Exit

en:

Energy

ex:

Exergy

GTS:

Gas turbine system

HP:

Hydrogen production

HPT:

High pressure turbine

HWP:

Hot-water production

i :

Input

LPT:

Low pressure turbine

RC:

Rankine cycle

sngen:

Single generation

trigen:

Trigeneration

WS:

Whole system

COP:

Performance coefficient

HEX:

Heat exchanger

HHV:

Higher heating value

LHV:

Lower heating value

References

  1. Khalid F, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2016) Techno-economic assessment of a renewable energy based integrated multigeneration system for green buildings. Applied Thermal Engineering 99:1286–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.01.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Data WB Fossil fuel energy consumption. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/eg.use.comm.fo.zs. Accessed 28 April 2019

  3. Dincer I (2000) Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 4:157–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(99)00011-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ozturk M, Dincer I (2013) Thermodynamic analysis of a solar-based multi-generation system with hydrogen production. Appl Therm Eng 51:1235–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.11.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dincer I, Zamfirescu C (2012) Renewable-energy-based multigeneration systems. Int J Energy Res 36:1403–1415. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.2882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Safari F, Dincer I (2019) Development and analysis of a novel biomass-based integrated system for multigeneration with hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44:3511–3526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sung T, Kim S, Kim KC (2017) Thermoeconomic analysis of a biogas-fueled micro-gas turbine with a bottoming organic Rankine cycle for a sewage sludge and food waste treatment plant in the Republic of Korea. Appl Therm Eng 127:963–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.08.106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sevinchan E, Dincer I, Lang H (2019) Energy and exergy analyses of a biogas driven multigenerational system. Energy 166:715–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu B, Zhang X, Shang D, Bao D, Zhang S, Zheng T (2016) Energetic-environmental-economic assessment of the biogas system with three utilization pathways: combined heat and power, biomethane and fuel cell. Bioresour Technol 214:722–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Giarola S, Forte O, Lanzini A, Gandiglio M, Santarelli M, Hawkes A (2018) Techno-economic assessment of biogas-fed solid oxide fuel cell combined heat and power system at industrial scale. Appl Energy 211:689–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taheri MH, Mosaffa AH, Farshi LG (2017) Energy, exergy and economic assessments of a novel integrated biomass based multigeneration energy system with hydrogen production and LNG regasification cycle. Energy 125:162–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karellas S, Braimakis K (2016) Energy-exergy analysis and economic investigation of a cogeneration and trigeneration ORC-VCC hybrid system utilizing biomass fuel and solar power. Energy Convers Manag . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.06.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Sulaiman FA, Hamdullahpur F, Dincer I (2011) Performance comparison of three trigeneration systems using organic rankine cycles. Energy 36:5741–5754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Sulaiman FA, Hamdullahpur F, Dincer I (2011) Greenhouse gas emission and exergy assessments of an integrated organic Rankine cycle with a biomass combustor for combined cooling, heating and power production. Appl Therm Eng 31:439–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.09.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yilmaz F, Ozturk M, Selbas R (2018) Thermodynamic performance assessment of ocean thermal energy conversion based hydrogen production and liquefaction process. Int J Hydrogen Energy 43:10626–10636. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2018.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bicer Y, Dincer I (2016) Analysis and performance evaluation of a renewable energy based multigeneration system. Energy 94:623–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Safari F, Dincer I (2018) Assessment and optimization of an integrated wind power system for hydrogen and methane production. Energy Convers Manag 177:693–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2018.09.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. El-Emam RS, Dincer I (2018) Investigation and assessment of a novel solar-driven integrated energy system. Energy Convers Manag 158:246–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yuksel YE, Ozturk M (2017) Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analyses of a geothermal energy based integrated system for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:2530–2546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahmadi P, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2014) Multi-objective optimization of a novel solar-based multigeneration energy system. Sol Energy 108:576–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLENER.2014.07.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. EES: Engineering Equation Solver| F-Chart Software : Engineering Software/Academic Version n.d. http://www.fchart.com/ees/. Accessed 19 Feb 2019

  22. Çengel YA, Boles MA (2015) Thermodynamics : an engineering approach, 8th edn. Mc. McGraw-Hi. n.d

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kotas TJ (1985) The exergy method of thermal plant analysis, 1st edn. Butterworths

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dincer I, Rosen M (2012) Exergy: energy. Environment and sustainable development. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Ozturk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yilmaz, F., Ozturk, M. (2020). Energy, Exergy and Environmental Analyses of Biomass Gasifier Combined Integrated Plant. In: Dincer, I., Colpan, C., Ezan, M. (eds) Environmentally-Benign Energy Solutions. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20637-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20637-6_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20636-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20637-6

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics