Skip to main content

Matching Technology with Enterprise Architecture and Enterprise Architecture Management Tasks Using Task Technology Fit

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling (BPMDS 2019, EMMSAD 2019)

Abstract

Advanced modeling is a challenging endeavor and good tool support is of paramount importance to ensure that the modeling objectives are met through the efficient execution of tasks. Tools for advanced modeling should not just support basic task modeling functionality such as easy-to-use interfaces for model creation, but also advanced task functionality such as consistency checks and analysis queries. Enterprise Architecture (EA) is concerned with the alignment of all aspects of an organization. Modeling plays a crucial role in EA and the matching of the correct tool to enable task execution is vital for enterprises engaged with EA. Enterprise Architecture Management (EAM) reflects recent trends that elevate EA toward a strategic management function within organizations. Tool support for EAM would necessarily include the execution of additional and often implicit advanced modeling tasks that support EAM capabilities. In this paper we report on a study that used the Task-Technology Fit (TTF) theory to investigate the extent to which basic and advanced task execution for EAM is supported by technology. We found that four of the six TTF factors fully supported and one partially supported EAM task execution. One factor was inconclusive. This study provided a insight into investigating tool support for EAM related task execution to achieve strategic EAM goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ArchiSurance is a fictitious case study developed by the OpenGroup to illustrate the ArchiMate modelling language using the TOGAF framework.

References

  1. Lapalme, J.: Three schools of thought on enterprise architecture. IT Prof. 14, 37–43 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2011.109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hinkelmann, K., Gerber, A., Karagiannis, D., Thoenssen, B., van der Merwe, A., Woitsch, R.: A new paradigm for the continuous alignment of business and IT: combining enterprise architecture modelling and enterprise ontology. Comput. Ind. 79, 77–86 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahlemann, F., Stettiner, E., Messerschmidt, M., Legner, C. (eds.): Strategic Enterprise Architecture Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24223-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Weiss, S., Aier, S., Winter, R.: Institutionalization and the Effectiveness of Enterprise Architecture Management, 19

    Google Scholar 

  5. Winter, K., Buckl, S., Matthes, F., Schweda, C.M.: Investigating the state-of-the-art in enterprise architecture management methods in literature and practice. MCIS 90 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fill, H.-G., Karagiannis, D.: On the conceptualisation of modelling methods using the ADOxx meta modelling platform. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Architectures 8, 4–25 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03345926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bork, D., et al.: Requirements engineering for model-based enterprise architecture management with ArchiMate. In: Pergl, R., Babkin, E., Lock, R., Malyzhenkov, P., Merunka, V. (eds.) EOMAS 2018. LNBIP, vol. 332, pp. 16–30. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00787-4_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bork, D., Miron, E.T.: OMiLAB - an open innovation community for modeling method engineering. In: ICMIE 2017, pp. 64–77 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goodhue, D.L.: Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Manage. Sci. 41, 1827–1844 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.12.1827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodhue, D.L., Thompson, R.L.: Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q. 19, 213 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/249689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zachman, J.: A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst. J. 26(3), 276–292 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lapalme, J., Gerber, A., van der Merwe, A., de Vries, M., Hinkelmann, K.: Exploring the future of enterprise architecture: a Zachman perspective. Comput. Ind. 79, 103–113 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogers, C.: Proposed Enterprise Architecture solutions for Industry 4.0 Manufacturing simulation information assets based on TOGAF. University of Denver University College (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lankhorst, M.M.: Enterprise architecture modelling—the issue of integration. Adv. Eng. Inform. 18, 205–216 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2005.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Vries, M., van der Merwe, A., Gerber, A.: Towards an enterprise evolution contextualisation model. Presented at the first international conference on enterprise systems (ES 2013), Cape Town (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. de Vries, M., Gerber, A., van der Merwe, A.: The nature of the enterprise engineering discipline. In: Aveiro, D., Tribolet, J., Gouveia, D. (eds.) EEWC 2014. LNBIP, vol. 174, pp. 1–15. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06505-2_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. The Open Group: TOGAF®, an Open Group standard. http://www.opengroup.org/subjectareas/enterprise/togaf

  18. Zachman, J.A.: The Zachman Framework for Enterprise Architecture. Zachman International (2011). http://www.zachman.com/

  19. OMG: ArchiMate® 3.0.1 Specification. The Open Group (2016). http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate3-doc/

  20. Lankhorst, M.M., Proper, H.A., Jonkers, H.: The anatomy of the archimate language. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Des. 1, 1–32 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4018/jismd.2010092301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M.M., ter Doest, H.W.L., Arbab, F., Bosma, H., Wieringa, R.J.: Enterprise architecture: management tool and blueprint for the organisation. Inf. Syst. Front. 8, 63–66 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-006-7970-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Matthes, F., Buckl, S., Leitel, J., Schweda, C.M.: Enterprise architecture management tool survey 2008. Techn. Univ. München (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.: Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Karagiannis, D., Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.): Domain-Specific Conceptual Modeling. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39417-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Bork, D., Buchmann, R., Karagiannis, D., Lee, M., Miron, E.T.: An open platform for modeling method conceptualization: the OMiLAB digital ecosystem. Communications of the Association of Information Systems (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Josey, A., Lankhorst, M., Band, I., Jonker, H., Quartel, D.: An Introduction to the ArchiMate® 3.0.1 Specification. The Open Group (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lankhorst, M. (ed.): Enterprise architecture at work: modelling, communication, and analysis. Springer, Berlin, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lankhorst, M., The ArchiMate team: The ArchiMate Language Primer (2004). https://web.archive.org/web/20110724162610/https://doc.novay.nl/dsweb/Get/Document-43839/

  29. ArchiSurance Case Study, Version 2. https://publications.opengroup.org/y163

  30. FREE Survey Software: Online Survey Software | QuestionPro®. https://www.questionpro.com/

Download references

Acknowledgment

Part of this research has been funded through the South Africa/Austria Joint Scientific and Technological Cooperation program with the project number ZA 11/2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunet Eybers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Eybers, S., Gerber, A., Bork, D., Karagiannis, D. (2019). Matching Technology with Enterprise Architecture and Enterprise Architecture Management Tasks Using Task Technology Fit. In: Reinhartz-Berger, I., Zdravkovic, J., Gulden, J., Schmidt, R. (eds) Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2019 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 352. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20618-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20618-5_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20617-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20618-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics