Advertisement

A Feminist Socio-Legal Approach to Ageing, Gender and Welfare in Northern Sweden

  • Lena WennbergEmail author
Chapter
  • 91 Downloads
Part of the International Perspectives on Aging book series (Int. Perspect. Aging, volume 22)

Abstract

A feminist socio-legal approach, understood as the “interface with the context within which law exists” is in this chapter elaborated and used to identify, think through and discuss the intersecting legal, political and economic discourses that could have constraining effects on the welfare of women in the rural and multicultural northernmost part of Sweden. The recognition of the gendered ‘socio’ and the identification of power imbalances in policy and law, underline the importance of a framework for further comparative analyses of welfare services and care in context. In an optimistic view on human rights, the strength of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), with its holistic and transformative approach, could provide a space for more grounded empirical research – on whether and with what outcome the CEDAW has been invoked, adopted or resisted in specific contexts – and jurisprudence that could promote social change and a life in dignity for women of any age, culture, ethnicity, or minority group.

Keywords

Socio-legal studies Ageing Gender Welfare New governance Human rights Elder services and care Swedish welfare state 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Umeå University, Sweden, who co-sponsored the AEPA-Wel workshop hosted by Umeå Forum for Studies in Law and Society in Umeå, Oct 2017.

References

  1. Albertson Fineman, M., Mattsson, T., & Andersson, U. (Eds.). (2017). Privatization, vulnerability, and social responsibility. A comparative perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, K. (2013). Freedom of choice in Swedish public Care of the Elderly. In Å. Gunnarsson (Ed.), Tracing the women-friendly welfare state. Gendered politics of everyday life in Sweden (pp. 170–189). Stockholm: Makadam.Google Scholar
  3. Andrew, R. (2014). Socio-economic drivers of change in the Arctic, AMAP Technical Report No. 9 (2014), Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  4. Arctic Council, Finland’s Chairmanship Program for the Arctic Council 2017–2019, Exploring Common Solutions, https://arctic-council.org/images/PDF_attachments/FIN_Chairmanship/Finnish_Chairmanship_Program_Arctic_Council_2017-2019.pdf
  5. Banakar, R. (2010). Law. Rights and justice in late modernity: A tentative theoretical framework. In R. Banakar (Ed.), Rights in context: Law and justice in late modern society, Farnham, Surrey (pp. 19–37). Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2005). Theory and method in socio-legal research. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Barents info.org no date.Google Scholar
  8. Boudiny, K. (2013). Active ageing: From empty rhetoric to effective policy tool. Ageing and Society, 33, 1077–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burman, M. (2010). The ability of criminal law to produce gender equality: Judicial discourses in the Swedish criminal legal system. Violence Against Women, 16(2), 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, C. M., & Wiles, P. (1975). The study of law in Society in Britain. Law and Society Review, 10, 547–578.Google Scholar
  11. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, General recommendation No. 27 on older women and protection of their human rights, CEDAW/C/2010/47/GC.1, Distr.: General 19 October 2010.Google Scholar
  12. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, General recommendation No. 34 on the rights of rural women, CEDAW/C/GC/34, Distr.: General 4 March 2016.Google Scholar
  13. Cotterrell, R. (2002). Subverting orthodoxy, making law central: A view of socio-legal studies. Journal of Law and Society, 29(4), 632–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1249–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Decision No 940/2011/EU, European Year for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations 2012.Google Scholar
  16. Einarsson, N., Larsen, J. N., Nilsson, A., & Young, O. R. (Eds.). (2004). Arctic human development report (AHDR I). Akureyri: Stefansson Arctic Institute.Google Scholar
  17. European Commission. Active ageing, http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1062
  18. European Parliament Resolution of 6 February 2013 on the European innovation partnership on active and healthy ageing (2012/2258(INI), OJ C 24, 22.1.2016, pp. 11–19.Google Scholar
  19. European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights, OJ C 83, 30.3.2010.Google Scholar
  20. Feenan, D. (2013). Exploring the ‘socio’ of socio-legal studies. Palgrave Macmillan socio-legal studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grabham, E., Cooper, D., Krishnadas, J., & Herman, D. (Eds.). (2008). Intersectionality and beyond: Law, power, and the politics of location. Albingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Gunnarsson, Å., & Svensson, E.-M. (2017). Gender equality in the Arctic and north; socio-legal and geopolitical challenges. Nordic Journal on Law and Society, 1(01–02), 6–15.Google Scholar
  23. Gunnarsson, Å. (Ed.). (2013). Tracing the women friendly welfare state. Gendered politics in everyday life in Sweden. Stockholm: Makadam.Google Scholar
  24. Hederyd, O., & Hansson, U. (1982). Från stenhacka till järntacka, Överkalix sockenhistoria. Del 1. Överkalix: Överkalix Municipality.Google Scholar
  25. Hellum, A., & Aasen, H. (Eds.). (2013). Womens’s human rights. CEDAW in international, regional and national law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Higgs, P., & Gilleard, C. (2015). Rethinking old age: Theorizing the fourth age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hunter, R. (2013). The gendered socio of socio-legal studies. In D. Feenan (Ed.), Exploring the ‘socio’ of socio-legal studies. Palgrave Macmillan socio-legal studies (pp. 205–227). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, P. (2014). Sociology and the European court of human rights. The Sociological Review, 62, 547–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kahn, R. L. (2002). Well-being: Concepts and measures. Journal of Social Issues, 58(4), 627–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lahey, K., Svensson, E.-M., & Gunnarsson, Åsa (2014) Gender challenges and human capital in the Arctic, Arctic Yearbook: 183–201.Google Scholar
  31. Länsstyrelsen Stockholm [County Administrative Board], National minorities, http://www.lansstyrelsen.se/stockholm/En/manniska-och-samhalle/nationella-minoriteter/Pages/default.aspx.
  32. Mégret, F. (2011). The human rights of older persons: A growing challenge. Human Rights Law Review, 11(1), 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moulaert, T., & Biggs, S. (2012). International and European policy on work and retirement: Reinventing critical perspectives on active ageing and mature subjectivity. Human Relations, 66(1), 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Naskali, P., Seppänen, M., & Begum, S. (Eds.). (2016). Ageing, wellbeing and climate change in the Arctic: An interdisciplinary analysis. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Nelken, D. (1981). The “Gap” problem in the sociology of law: A theoretical review, Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, pp. 35–61.Google Scholar
  36. Niemi-Kiesiläinen, J., Honkatukia, P., & Ruskanen, M. (2007). Legal texts as Discources. In Å. Gunnarsson, E.-M. Svensson, & M. Davies (Eds.), Exploiting the limits of law. Swedish feminism and the challenge to pessimism (pp. 69–87). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  37. Nousiainen, K. (2001). Transformative Nordic Welfarism. Liberal and communitarian trends in family and market law. In K. Nousiainen, Å. Gunnarsson, K. Lundström, & J. Niemi-Kiesiläinen (Eds.), Responsible selves. Women in the Nordicc legal culture (pp. 25–77). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  38. Numhauser Henning, A. (Ed.). (2013). Introduction to the Norma elder law research environment. Different approaches to elder law. Lund: Lund University, Faculty of Law.Google Scholar
  39. Powell, J. L., & Hendricks, J. (Eds.). (2009). The welfare state in post-industrial society. A global perspective. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Prop. 2009/10:116, Värdigt liv i äldreomsorgen [Dignity in Elder Care] Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, Stockholm, 25 February 2010 (Swed.).Google Scholar
  41. Prop. 2008/09:158, Från erkännande till egenmakt: Regeringens strategi för de nationella minoriteterna [From Recognition to Empowerment: The Government’s Strategy for National Minorities], Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, Stockholm, 9 March 2009 (Swed.).Google Scholar
  42. Riksrevisionen. (2014). Bostäder för äldre I avfolkningsorter, RIR 2014:2 [National Audit Office, Housing for Elderly in Rural Sweden], (Swed.)Google Scholar
  43. Sipilä, J., Anttonen, A., & Kröger, T. (2009). A Nordic welfare state in post-industrial society. In J. L. Powell & J. Hendricks (Eds.), The welfare state in post-industrial society. A global perspective (pp. 181–199). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Somek, A. (2011). Engineering equality: An essay on European anti-discrimination law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Statistics Sweden. (2014). Inrikes flyttning 2013. Var åttonde person flyttade under 2013, http://www.scb.se/sv
  46. Statistics Sweden. (2017). Hög medellivslängd i Sverige, http://www.scb.se/sv/Hitta-statistik/Artiklar/Hog-medellivslangd-i-Sverige/
  47. Svensson, E.-M. (2007). Boundary-work in legal scholarship. In Å. Gunnarsson, E.-M. Svensson, & M. Davies (Eds.), Exploiting the limits of law. Swedish feminism and the challenge to pessimism (pp. 17–49). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  48. Svensson, E.-M. (2017). Gender equality in the governance of the Arctic region. Nordic Journal on Law and Society, 01(01–02), 16–64.Google Scholar
  49. United Nations. (2002). Political declaration and Madrid international plan of action on ageing, second world assembly on ageing, Madrid, Spain, 8–12 April 2002.Google Scholar
  50. United Nations (2015), Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development, A/RES/70/1, General Assembly Distr.: General 21 October 2015.Google Scholar
  51. Walker, A., & Maltby, T. (2012). Active ageing: A strategic policy solution to demographic ageing in the European Union. Int J Soc Welfare, 21, 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wennberg, L. (2008). Social security for solo mothers in Swedish and EU law. On the constructions of normality and the boundaries of social citizenship. Uppsala: IUSTUS förlag.Google Scholar
  53. Wennberg, L. (2017). Wellbeing and gender equality for the elderly in the context of Arctic Sweden. Nordic Journal on Law and Society, 01(01–02), 175–193.Google Scholar
  54. Wheeler, S., & Thomas, P. (2002). Socio-Legal Studies. In D. J. Hayton (Ed.), Law’s future(s) (pp. 267–280). Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations